Cargando…

Women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: The practice of antenatal breast expression (ABE) has been proposed as a strategy to promote successful breastfeeding. Although there has been some focus on the evaluation of the effects of ABE in promotion of breastfeeding, little or no evidence exists on women’s experiences of ABE or o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fair, Frankie J., Watson, Helen, Gardner, Rachel, Soltani, Hora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29618359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0497-4
_version_ 1783311971155705856
author Fair, Frankie J.
Watson, Helen
Gardner, Rachel
Soltani, Hora
author_facet Fair, Frankie J.
Watson, Helen
Gardner, Rachel
Soltani, Hora
author_sort Fair, Frankie J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The practice of antenatal breast expression (ABE) has been proposed as a strategy to promote successful breastfeeding. Although there has been some focus on the evaluation of the effects of ABE in promotion of breastfeeding, little or no evidence exists on women’s experiences of ABE or opinions on ABE, particularly amongst overweight or obese women. METHODS: This study aimed to explore women’s knowledge, practices and opinions of ABE, and any differences within the overweight and obese subgroups. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken using an online questionnaire distributed by a maternity user group representative via social media. Quantitative data were analysed using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests in SPSS. Simple thematic analysis was used for the qualitative data. RESULTS: A total of 688 responses were analysed; the sample represented a group of breastfeeding mothers, of whom 64.5% had heard of ABE, 8.2% had been advised to do ABE, and 14.2% had undertaken ABE. Of the women who had been advised to do ABE, 67.9% had complied. Most participants (58.6%) were unsure if ABE was a good idea; however 80.9% would consider doing ABE if it was found to be helpful to prepare for breastfeeding. Women in the overweight or obese subgroups were significantly more likely to have heard of ABE (p < 0.001), and positive opinion of ABE also increased with higher BMI groups. The qualitative data demonstrated participants felt ABE may be beneficial when mother or baby have medical problems, and in preparation for breastfeeding, but highlighted their concerns that it may interfere with nature and be harmful, and that they wanted more information and knowledge about ABE. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst women who have breastfed, many have heard of ABE, compliance with advice to undertake ABE is relatively high, and ABE is considered an acceptable practice. Further investigation into the benefits and safety of ABE is warranted, to address the needs of childbearing women for evidence-based information about this practice. If the evidence base is established, overweight and obese pregnant women could be an important target group for this intervention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12978-018-0497-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5885364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58853642018-04-09 Women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey Fair, Frankie J. Watson, Helen Gardner, Rachel Soltani, Hora Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: The practice of antenatal breast expression (ABE) has been proposed as a strategy to promote successful breastfeeding. Although there has been some focus on the evaluation of the effects of ABE in promotion of breastfeeding, little or no evidence exists on women’s experiences of ABE or opinions on ABE, particularly amongst overweight or obese women. METHODS: This study aimed to explore women’s knowledge, practices and opinions of ABE, and any differences within the overweight and obese subgroups. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken using an online questionnaire distributed by a maternity user group representative via social media. Quantitative data were analysed using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests in SPSS. Simple thematic analysis was used for the qualitative data. RESULTS: A total of 688 responses were analysed; the sample represented a group of breastfeeding mothers, of whom 64.5% had heard of ABE, 8.2% had been advised to do ABE, and 14.2% had undertaken ABE. Of the women who had been advised to do ABE, 67.9% had complied. Most participants (58.6%) were unsure if ABE was a good idea; however 80.9% would consider doing ABE if it was found to be helpful to prepare for breastfeeding. Women in the overweight or obese subgroups were significantly more likely to have heard of ABE (p < 0.001), and positive opinion of ABE also increased with higher BMI groups. The qualitative data demonstrated participants felt ABE may be beneficial when mother or baby have medical problems, and in preparation for breastfeeding, but highlighted their concerns that it may interfere with nature and be harmful, and that they wanted more information and knowledge about ABE. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst women who have breastfed, many have heard of ABE, compliance with advice to undertake ABE is relatively high, and ABE is considered an acceptable practice. Further investigation into the benefits and safety of ABE is warranted, to address the needs of childbearing women for evidence-based information about this practice. If the evidence base is established, overweight and obese pregnant women could be an important target group for this intervention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12978-018-0497-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5885364/ /pubmed/29618359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0497-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Fair, Frankie J.
Watson, Helen
Gardner, Rachel
Soltani, Hora
Women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey
title Women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29618359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0497-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fairfrankiej womensperspectivesonantenatalbreastexpressionacrosssectionalsurvey
AT watsonhelen womensperspectivesonantenatalbreastexpressionacrosssectionalsurvey
AT gardnerrachel womensperspectivesonantenatalbreastexpressionacrosssectionalsurvey
AT soltanihora womensperspectivesonantenatalbreastexpressionacrosssectionalsurvey