Cargando…
Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM (®) Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads
PURPOSE: The objective of this investigation is to study prosthodontics and internal components resistance to the masticatory stress and considering different force directions by using Finite Element Method analysis (FEM). The structural materials of the components are usually Titanium alloy grade 4...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682092 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010219 |
_version_ | 1783311996567945216 |
---|---|
author | Cervino, Gabriele Romeo, Umberto Lauritano, Floriana Bramanti, Ennio Fiorillo, Luca D’Amico, Cesare Milone, Dario Laino, Luigi Campolongo, Francesco Rapisarda, Silvia Cicciù, Marco |
author_facet | Cervino, Gabriele Romeo, Umberto Lauritano, Floriana Bramanti, Ennio Fiorillo, Luca D’Amico, Cesare Milone, Dario Laino, Luigi Campolongo, Francesco Rapisarda, Silvia Cicciù, Marco |
author_sort | Cervino, Gabriele |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The objective of this investigation is to study prosthodontics and internal components resistance to the masticatory stress and considering different force directions by using Finite Element Method analysis (FEM). The structural materials of the components are usually Titanium alloy grade 4 or 5 and thus, guarantee the integration of the fixture in the bone due to the osteointegration phenomena. Even if the long-term dental implant survival rate is easy to be obtained and confirmed by numerous researches, the related clinical success, due to the alteration of the mechanical and prosthodontics components is still controversial. METHODS: By applying engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses, it has been investigated how dental implant material was held against the masticatory strength during the dynamic masticatory cycles. A three-dimensional system involved fixture, abutment and the connection screws, which were created and analyzed. The elastic features of the materials used in the study were taken from recent literature data. RESULTS: Data revealed a different response for both types of devices, although implant neck and dental abutment showed better results for all conditions of loading while the abutment screw represented aweak point of the system. CONCLUSION: The data of this virtual model showed all the features of different prosthetic retention systems under the masticatory load. Clinicians should find better prosthetic balance in order to better distribute the stress over the component and to guarantee patients’ clinical long-term results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5885472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58854722018-04-20 Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM (®) Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads Cervino, Gabriele Romeo, Umberto Lauritano, Floriana Bramanti, Ennio Fiorillo, Luca D’Amico, Cesare Milone, Dario Laino, Luigi Campolongo, Francesco Rapisarda, Silvia Cicciù, Marco Open Dent J Dentistry PURPOSE: The objective of this investigation is to study prosthodontics and internal components resistance to the masticatory stress and considering different force directions by using Finite Element Method analysis (FEM). The structural materials of the components are usually Titanium alloy grade 4 or 5 and thus, guarantee the integration of the fixture in the bone due to the osteointegration phenomena. Even if the long-term dental implant survival rate is easy to be obtained and confirmed by numerous researches, the related clinical success, due to the alteration of the mechanical and prosthodontics components is still controversial. METHODS: By applying engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses, it has been investigated how dental implant material was held against the masticatory strength during the dynamic masticatory cycles. A three-dimensional system involved fixture, abutment and the connection screws, which were created and analyzed. The elastic features of the materials used in the study were taken from recent literature data. RESULTS: Data revealed a different response for both types of devices, although implant neck and dental abutment showed better results for all conditions of loading while the abutment screw represented aweak point of the system. CONCLUSION: The data of this virtual model showed all the features of different prosthetic retention systems under the masticatory load. Clinicians should find better prosthetic balance in order to better distribute the stress over the component and to guarantee patients’ clinical long-term results. Bentham Open 2018-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5885472/ /pubmed/29682092 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010219 Text en © 2018 Cervino et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Dentistry Cervino, Gabriele Romeo, Umberto Lauritano, Floriana Bramanti, Ennio Fiorillo, Luca D’Amico, Cesare Milone, Dario Laino, Luigi Campolongo, Francesco Rapisarda, Silvia Cicciù, Marco Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM (®) Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads |
title | Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM (®) Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads |
title_full | Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM (®) Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads |
title_fullStr | Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM (®) Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads |
title_full_unstemmed | Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM (®) Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads |
title_short | Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM (®) Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads |
title_sort | fem and von mises analysis of osstem (®) dental implant structural components: evaluation of different direction dynamic loads |
topic | Dentistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682092 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cervinogabriele femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads AT romeoumberto femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads AT lauritanofloriana femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads AT bramantiennio femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads AT fiorilloluca femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads AT damicocesare femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads AT milonedario femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads AT lainoluigi femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads AT campolongofrancesco femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads AT rapisardasilvia femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads AT cicciumarco femandvonmisesanalysisofosstemdentalimplantstructuralcomponentsevaluationofdifferentdirectiondynamicloads |