Cargando…

Does standoff material affect acoustic radiation force impulse elastography? A preclinical study of a modified elastography phantom

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the influence of standoff material on acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) measurements in an elasticity phantom by using two different probes. METHODS: Using ARFI elastography, 10 observers measured the shear wave velocity (SWV, m/sec) in different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollerieth, Katharina, Gaßmann, Bernhard, Wagenpfeil, Stefan, Kemmner, Stephan, Heemann, Uwe, Stock, Konrad Friedrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29032665
http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.17002
_version_ 1783311998422876160
author Hollerieth, Katharina
Gaßmann, Bernhard
Wagenpfeil, Stefan
Kemmner, Stephan
Heemann, Uwe
Stock, Konrad Friedrich
author_facet Hollerieth, Katharina
Gaßmann, Bernhard
Wagenpfeil, Stefan
Kemmner, Stephan
Heemann, Uwe
Stock, Konrad Friedrich
author_sort Hollerieth, Katharina
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the influence of standoff material on acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) measurements in an elasticity phantom by using two different probes. METHODS: Using ARFI elastography, 10 observers measured the shear wave velocity (SWV, m/sec) in different lesions of an elasticity phantom with a convex 4C1 probe and a linear 9L4 probe. The experimental setup was expanded by the use of an interposed piece of porcine muscle as standoff material. The probe pressure on the phantom was registered. RESULTS: Faulty ARFI measurements occurred more often when quantifying the hardest lesion (74.0 kPa 4.97 m/sec) by the 9L4 probe with the porcine muscle as a standoff material interposed between the probe and the phantom. The success rate for ARFI measurements in these series was 52.4%, compared with 99.5% in the other series. The SWV values measured with the 9L4 probe were significantly higher (3.33±1.39 m/sec vs. 2.60±0.74 m/sec, P<0.001 in the group without muscle) and were closer to the reference value than those measured with the 4C1 probe (0.25±0.23 m/sec vs. 0.85±1.21 m/sec, P<0.001 in the same group). The SWV values measured when using the muscle as a standoff material were lower than those without the muscle (significant for 9L4, P=0.040). The deviation from the reference value and the variance increased significantly with the 9L4 probe if the muscle was in situ (B=0.27, P=0.004 and B=0.32, P<0.001). In our study, the pressure exerted by the operator had no effect on the SWV values. CONCLUSION: The presence of porcine muscle acting as a standoff material influenced the occurrence of failed measurements as well as the variance and the accuracy of the measured values. The linear high-frequency probe was particularly affected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5885480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58854802018-04-06 Does standoff material affect acoustic radiation force impulse elastography? A preclinical study of a modified elastography phantom Hollerieth, Katharina Gaßmann, Bernhard Wagenpfeil, Stefan Kemmner, Stephan Heemann, Uwe Stock, Konrad Friedrich Ultrasonography Original Article PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the influence of standoff material on acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) measurements in an elasticity phantom by using two different probes. METHODS: Using ARFI elastography, 10 observers measured the shear wave velocity (SWV, m/sec) in different lesions of an elasticity phantom with a convex 4C1 probe and a linear 9L4 probe. The experimental setup was expanded by the use of an interposed piece of porcine muscle as standoff material. The probe pressure on the phantom was registered. RESULTS: Faulty ARFI measurements occurred more often when quantifying the hardest lesion (74.0 kPa 4.97 m/sec) by the 9L4 probe with the porcine muscle as a standoff material interposed between the probe and the phantom. The success rate for ARFI measurements in these series was 52.4%, compared with 99.5% in the other series. The SWV values measured with the 9L4 probe were significantly higher (3.33±1.39 m/sec vs. 2.60±0.74 m/sec, P<0.001 in the group without muscle) and were closer to the reference value than those measured with the 4C1 probe (0.25±0.23 m/sec vs. 0.85±1.21 m/sec, P<0.001 in the same group). The SWV values measured when using the muscle as a standoff material were lower than those without the muscle (significant for 9L4, P=0.040). The deviation from the reference value and the variance increased significantly with the 9L4 probe if the muscle was in situ (B=0.27, P=0.004 and B=0.32, P<0.001). In our study, the pressure exerted by the operator had no effect on the SWV values. CONCLUSION: The presence of porcine muscle acting as a standoff material influenced the occurrence of failed measurements as well as the variance and the accuracy of the measured values. The linear high-frequency probe was particularly affected. Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2018-04 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5885480/ /pubmed/29032665 http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.17002 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (KSUM) This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hollerieth, Katharina
Gaßmann, Bernhard
Wagenpfeil, Stefan
Kemmner, Stephan
Heemann, Uwe
Stock, Konrad Friedrich
Does standoff material affect acoustic radiation force impulse elastography? A preclinical study of a modified elastography phantom
title Does standoff material affect acoustic radiation force impulse elastography? A preclinical study of a modified elastography phantom
title_full Does standoff material affect acoustic radiation force impulse elastography? A preclinical study of a modified elastography phantom
title_fullStr Does standoff material affect acoustic radiation force impulse elastography? A preclinical study of a modified elastography phantom
title_full_unstemmed Does standoff material affect acoustic radiation force impulse elastography? A preclinical study of a modified elastography phantom
title_short Does standoff material affect acoustic radiation force impulse elastography? A preclinical study of a modified elastography phantom
title_sort does standoff material affect acoustic radiation force impulse elastography? a preclinical study of a modified elastography phantom
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29032665
http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.17002
work_keys_str_mv AT holleriethkatharina doesstandoffmaterialaffectacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyapreclinicalstudyofamodifiedelastographyphantom
AT gaßmannbernhard doesstandoffmaterialaffectacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyapreclinicalstudyofamodifiedelastographyphantom
AT wagenpfeilstefan doesstandoffmaterialaffectacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyapreclinicalstudyofamodifiedelastographyphantom
AT kemmnerstephan doesstandoffmaterialaffectacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyapreclinicalstudyofamodifiedelastographyphantom
AT heemannuwe doesstandoffmaterialaffectacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyapreclinicalstudyofamodifiedelastographyphantom
AT stockkonradfriedrich doesstandoffmaterialaffectacousticradiationforceimpulseelastographyapreclinicalstudyofamodifiedelastographyphantom