Cargando…

Decision-variable correlation

An extension of the signal-detection theory framework is described and demonstrated for two-alternative identification tasks. The extended framework assumes that the subject and an arbitrary model (or two subjects, or the same subject on two occasions) are performing the same task with the same stim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sebastian, Stephen, Geisler, Wilson S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29614152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/18.4.3
_version_ 1783312057268961280
author Sebastian, Stephen
Geisler, Wilson S.
author_facet Sebastian, Stephen
Geisler, Wilson S.
author_sort Sebastian, Stephen
collection PubMed
description An extension of the signal-detection theory framework is described and demonstrated for two-alternative identification tasks. The extended framework assumes that the subject and an arbitrary model (or two subjects, or the same subject on two occasions) are performing the same task with the same stimuli, and that on each trial they both compute values of a decision variable. Thus, their joint performance is described by six fundamental quantities: two levels of intrinsic discriminability (d′), two values of decision criterion, and two decision-variable correlations (DVCs), one for each of the two categories of stimuli. The framework should be widely applicable for testing models and characterizing individual differences in behavioral and neurophysiological studies of perception and cognition. We demonstrate the framework for the well-known task of detecting a Gaussian target in white noise. We find that (a) subjects' DVCs are approximately equal to the square root of their efficiency relative to ideal (in agreement with the prediction of a popular class of models), (b) between-subjects and within-subject (double-pass) DVCs increase with target contrast and are greater for target-present than target-absent trials (rejecting many models), (c) model parameters can be estimated by maximizing DVCs between the model and subject, (d) a model with a center–surround template and a specific (modest) level of position uncertainty predicts the trial-by-trial performance of subjects as well as (or better than) presenting the same stimulus again to the subjects (i.e., the double-pass DVCs), and (e) models of trial-by-trial performance should not include a representation of internal noise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5885773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58857732018-04-06 Decision-variable correlation Sebastian, Stephen Geisler, Wilson S. J Vis Article An extension of the signal-detection theory framework is described and demonstrated for two-alternative identification tasks. The extended framework assumes that the subject and an arbitrary model (or two subjects, or the same subject on two occasions) are performing the same task with the same stimuli, and that on each trial they both compute values of a decision variable. Thus, their joint performance is described by six fundamental quantities: two levels of intrinsic discriminability (d′), two values of decision criterion, and two decision-variable correlations (DVCs), one for each of the two categories of stimuli. The framework should be widely applicable for testing models and characterizing individual differences in behavioral and neurophysiological studies of perception and cognition. We demonstrate the framework for the well-known task of detecting a Gaussian target in white noise. We find that (a) subjects' DVCs are approximately equal to the square root of their efficiency relative to ideal (in agreement with the prediction of a popular class of models), (b) between-subjects and within-subject (double-pass) DVCs increase with target contrast and are greater for target-present than target-absent trials (rejecting many models), (c) model parameters can be estimated by maximizing DVCs between the model and subject, (d) a model with a center–surround template and a specific (modest) level of position uncertainty predicts the trial-by-trial performance of subjects as well as (or better than) presenting the same stimulus again to the subjects (i.e., the double-pass DVCs), and (e) models of trial-by-trial performance should not include a representation of internal noise. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5885773/ /pubmed/29614152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/18.4.3 Text en Copyright 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Sebastian, Stephen
Geisler, Wilson S.
Decision-variable correlation
title Decision-variable correlation
title_full Decision-variable correlation
title_fullStr Decision-variable correlation
title_full_unstemmed Decision-variable correlation
title_short Decision-variable correlation
title_sort decision-variable correlation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29614152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/18.4.3
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianstephen decisionvariablecorrelation
AT geislerwilsons decisionvariablecorrelation