Cargando…

Allocation of development assistance for health: is the predominance of national income justified?

Gross national income (GNI) per capita is widely regarded as a key determinant of health outcomes. Major donors heavily rely on GNI per capita to allocate development assistance for health (DAH). This article questions this paradigm by analysing the determinants of health outcomes using cross-sectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sterck, Olivier, Roser, Max, Ncube, Mthuli, Thewissen, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29415236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw173
_version_ 1783312112739680256
author Sterck, Olivier
Roser, Max
Ncube, Mthuli
Thewissen, Stefan
author_facet Sterck, Olivier
Roser, Max
Ncube, Mthuli
Thewissen, Stefan
author_sort Sterck, Olivier
collection PubMed
description Gross national income (GNI) per capita is widely regarded as a key determinant of health outcomes. Major donors heavily rely on GNI per capita to allocate development assistance for health (DAH). This article questions this paradigm by analysing the determinants of health outcomes using cross-sectional data from 99 countries in 2012. We use disability-adjusted life years (Group I) per capita as our main indicator for health outcomes. We consider four primary variables: GNI per capita, institutional capacity, individual poverty and the epidemiological surroundings. Our empirical strategy has two innovations. First, we construct a health poverty line of 10.89 international-$ per day, which measures the minimum level of income an individual needs to have access to basic healthcare. Second, we take the contagious nature of communicable diseases into account, by estimating the extent to which the population health in neighbouring countries (the epidemiological surroundings) affects health outcomes. We apply a spatial two-stage least-squares model to mitigate the risks of reverse causality. Our model captures 92% of the variation in health outcomes. We emphasize four findings. First, GNI per capita is not a significant predictor of health outcomes once other factors are controlled for. Second, the poverty gap below the 10.89 health poverty line is a good measure of universal access to healthcare, as it explains 19% of deviation in health outcomes. Third, the epidemiological surroundings in which countries are embedded capture as much as 47% of deviation in health outcomes. Finally, institutional capacity explains 10% of deviation in health outcomes. Our empirical findings suggest that allocation frameworks for DAH should not only take into account national income, which remains an important indicator of countries’ financial capacity, but also individual poverty, governance and epidemiological surroundings to increase impact on health outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5886300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58863002018-04-09 Allocation of development assistance for health: is the predominance of national income justified? Sterck, Olivier Roser, Max Ncube, Mthuli Thewissen, Stefan Health Policy Plan Original Articles Gross national income (GNI) per capita is widely regarded as a key determinant of health outcomes. Major donors heavily rely on GNI per capita to allocate development assistance for health (DAH). This article questions this paradigm by analysing the determinants of health outcomes using cross-sectional data from 99 countries in 2012. We use disability-adjusted life years (Group I) per capita as our main indicator for health outcomes. We consider four primary variables: GNI per capita, institutional capacity, individual poverty and the epidemiological surroundings. Our empirical strategy has two innovations. First, we construct a health poverty line of 10.89 international-$ per day, which measures the minimum level of income an individual needs to have access to basic healthcare. Second, we take the contagious nature of communicable diseases into account, by estimating the extent to which the population health in neighbouring countries (the epidemiological surroundings) affects health outcomes. We apply a spatial two-stage least-squares model to mitigate the risks of reverse causality. Our model captures 92% of the variation in health outcomes. We emphasize four findings. First, GNI per capita is not a significant predictor of health outcomes once other factors are controlled for. Second, the poverty gap below the 10.89 health poverty line is a good measure of universal access to healthcare, as it explains 19% of deviation in health outcomes. Third, the epidemiological surroundings in which countries are embedded capture as much as 47% of deviation in health outcomes. Finally, institutional capacity explains 10% of deviation in health outcomes. Our empirical findings suggest that allocation frameworks for DAH should not only take into account national income, which remains an important indicator of countries’ financial capacity, but also individual poverty, governance and epidemiological surroundings to increase impact on health outcomes. Oxford University Press 2018-02 2018-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5886300/ /pubmed/29415236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw173 Text en The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sterck, Olivier
Roser, Max
Ncube, Mthuli
Thewissen, Stefan
Allocation of development assistance for health: is the predominance of national income justified?
title Allocation of development assistance for health: is the predominance of national income justified?
title_full Allocation of development assistance for health: is the predominance of national income justified?
title_fullStr Allocation of development assistance for health: is the predominance of national income justified?
title_full_unstemmed Allocation of development assistance for health: is the predominance of national income justified?
title_short Allocation of development assistance for health: is the predominance of national income justified?
title_sort allocation of development assistance for health: is the predominance of national income justified?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29415236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw173
work_keys_str_mv AT sterckolivier allocationofdevelopmentassistanceforhealthisthepredominanceofnationalincomejustified
AT rosermax allocationofdevelopmentassistanceforhealthisthepredominanceofnationalincomejustified
AT ncubemthuli allocationofdevelopmentassistanceforhealthisthepredominanceofnationalincomejustified
AT thewissenstefan allocationofdevelopmentassistanceforhealthisthepredominanceofnationalincomejustified