Cargando…

Clinical diagnostic model for sciatica developed in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain

BACKGROUND: Identification of sciatica may assist timely management but can be challenging in clinical practice. Diagnostic models to identify sciatica have mainly been developed in secondary care settings with conflicting reference standard selection. This study explores the challenges of reference...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stynes, Siobhán, Konstantinou, Kika, Ogollah, Reuben, Hay, Elaine M., Dunn, Kate M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191852
_version_ 1783312119444275200
author Stynes, Siobhán
Konstantinou, Kika
Ogollah, Reuben
Hay, Elaine M.
Dunn, Kate M.
author_facet Stynes, Siobhán
Konstantinou, Kika
Ogollah, Reuben
Hay, Elaine M.
Dunn, Kate M.
author_sort Stynes, Siobhán
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identification of sciatica may assist timely management but can be challenging in clinical practice. Diagnostic models to identify sciatica have mainly been developed in secondary care settings with conflicting reference standard selection. This study explores the challenges of reference standard selection and aims to ascertain which combination of clinical assessment items best identify sciatica in people seeking primary healthcare. METHODS: Data on 394 low back-related leg pain consulters were analysed. Potential sciatica indicators were seven clinical assessment items. Two reference standards were used: (i) high confidence sciatica clinical diagnosis; (ii) high confidence sciatica clinical diagnosis with confirmatory magnetic resonance imaging findings. Multivariable logistic regression models were produced for both reference standards. A tool predicting sciatica diagnosis in low back-related leg pain was derived. Latent class modelling explored the validity of the reference standard. RESULTS: Model (i) retained five items; model (ii) retained six items. Four items remained in both models: below knee pain, leg pain worse than back pain, positive neural tension tests and neurological deficit. Model (i) was well calibrated (p = 0.18), discrimination was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.95 (95% CI 0.93, 0.98). Model (ii) showed good discrimination (AUC 0.82; 0.78, 0.86) but poor calibration (p = 0.004). Bootstrapping revealed minimal overfitting in both models. Agreement between the two latent classes and clinical diagnosis groups defined by model (i) was substantial, and fair for model (ii). CONCLUSION: Four clinical assessment items were common in both reference standard definitions of sciatica. A simple scoring tool for identifying sciatica was developed. These criteria could be used clinically and in research to improve accuracy of identification of this subgroup of back pain patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5886387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58863872018-04-20 Clinical diagnostic model for sciatica developed in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain Stynes, Siobhán Konstantinou, Kika Ogollah, Reuben Hay, Elaine M. Dunn, Kate M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Identification of sciatica may assist timely management but can be challenging in clinical practice. Diagnostic models to identify sciatica have mainly been developed in secondary care settings with conflicting reference standard selection. This study explores the challenges of reference standard selection and aims to ascertain which combination of clinical assessment items best identify sciatica in people seeking primary healthcare. METHODS: Data on 394 low back-related leg pain consulters were analysed. Potential sciatica indicators were seven clinical assessment items. Two reference standards were used: (i) high confidence sciatica clinical diagnosis; (ii) high confidence sciatica clinical diagnosis with confirmatory magnetic resonance imaging findings. Multivariable logistic regression models were produced for both reference standards. A tool predicting sciatica diagnosis in low back-related leg pain was derived. Latent class modelling explored the validity of the reference standard. RESULTS: Model (i) retained five items; model (ii) retained six items. Four items remained in both models: below knee pain, leg pain worse than back pain, positive neural tension tests and neurological deficit. Model (i) was well calibrated (p = 0.18), discrimination was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.95 (95% CI 0.93, 0.98). Model (ii) showed good discrimination (AUC 0.82; 0.78, 0.86) but poor calibration (p = 0.004). Bootstrapping revealed minimal overfitting in both models. Agreement between the two latent classes and clinical diagnosis groups defined by model (i) was substantial, and fair for model (ii). CONCLUSION: Four clinical assessment items were common in both reference standard definitions of sciatica. A simple scoring tool for identifying sciatica was developed. These criteria could be used clinically and in research to improve accuracy of identification of this subgroup of back pain patients. Public Library of Science 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5886387/ /pubmed/29621243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191852 Text en © 2018 Stynes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stynes, Siobhán
Konstantinou, Kika
Ogollah, Reuben
Hay, Elaine M.
Dunn, Kate M.
Clinical diagnostic model for sciatica developed in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain
title Clinical diagnostic model for sciatica developed in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain
title_full Clinical diagnostic model for sciatica developed in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain
title_fullStr Clinical diagnostic model for sciatica developed in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain
title_full_unstemmed Clinical diagnostic model for sciatica developed in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain
title_short Clinical diagnostic model for sciatica developed in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain
title_sort clinical diagnostic model for sciatica developed in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191852
work_keys_str_mv AT stynessiobhan clinicaldiagnosticmodelforsciaticadevelopedinprimarycarepatientswithlowbackrelatedlegpain
AT konstantinoukika clinicaldiagnosticmodelforsciaticadevelopedinprimarycarepatientswithlowbackrelatedlegpain
AT ogollahreuben clinicaldiagnosticmodelforsciaticadevelopedinprimarycarepatientswithlowbackrelatedlegpain
AT hayelainem clinicaldiagnosticmodelforsciaticadevelopedinprimarycarepatientswithlowbackrelatedlegpain
AT dunnkatem clinicaldiagnosticmodelforsciaticadevelopedinprimarycarepatientswithlowbackrelatedlegpain