Cargando…

Illness management and recovery: Clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial in community mental health centers

OBJECTIVE: Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is a psychosocial intervention with a recovery-oriented approach. The program has been evaluated in different settings; however evidence for the effects of IMR is still deficient. The aim of this trial was to investigate the benefits and harms of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalum, Helle Stentoft, Waldemar, Anna Kristine, Korsbek, Lisa, Hjorthøj, Carsten, Mikkelsen, John Hagel, Thomsen, Karin, Kistrup, Kristen, Olander, Mette, Lindschou, Jane, Nordentoft, Merete, Eplov, Lene Falgaard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194027
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is a psychosocial intervention with a recovery-oriented approach. The program has been evaluated in different settings; however evidence for the effects of IMR is still deficient. The aim of this trial was to investigate the benefits and harms of the IMR program compared with treatment as usual in Danish patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. METHOD: The trial was designed as a randomized, assessor-blinded, multi-center, clinical trial investigating the IMR program compared with usual treatment. 198 people diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder participated. The primary outcome was the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF-F) at the end of intervention and the secondary and explorative outcomes included severity of symptoms and service utilization. RESULTS: IMR had no significant effect on functioning, symptoms, substance use or service utilization. CONCLUSION: This randomized trial contributes to the evidence base of IMR by providing a methodological solid base for its conclusions; however the trial has some important limitations. More research is needed to get a firm answer on the effectiveness of the IMR.