Cargando…

Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators of attachment under active inference

This paper addresses the formation of infant attachment types within the context of active inference: a holistic account of action, perception and learning in the brain. We show how the organised forms of attachment (secure, avoidant and ambivalent) might arise in (Bayesian) infants. Specifically, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cittern, David, Nolte, Tobias, Friston, Karl, Edalat, Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193955
_version_ 1783312125730488320
author Cittern, David
Nolte, Tobias
Friston, Karl
Edalat, Abbas
author_facet Cittern, David
Nolte, Tobias
Friston, Karl
Edalat, Abbas
author_sort Cittern, David
collection PubMed
description This paper addresses the formation of infant attachment types within the context of active inference: a holistic account of action, perception and learning in the brain. We show how the organised forms of attachment (secure, avoidant and ambivalent) might arise in (Bayesian) infants. Specifically, we show that these distinct forms of attachment emerge from a minimisation of free energy—over interoceptive states relating to internal stress levels—when seeking proximity to caregivers who have a varying impact on these interoceptive states. In line with empirical findings in disrupted patterns of affective communication, we then demonstrate how exteroceptive cues (in the form of caregiver-mediated AMBIANCE affective communication errors, ACE) can result in disorganised forms of attachment in infants of caregivers who consistently increase stress when the infant seeks proximity, but can have an organising (towards ambivalence) effect in infants of inconsistent caregivers. In particular, we differentiate disorganised attachment from avoidance in terms of the high epistemic value of proximity seeking behaviours (resulting from the caregiver’s misleading exteroceptive cues) that preclude the emergence of coherent and organised behavioural policies. Our work, the first to formulate infant attachment in terms of active inference, makes a new testable prediction with regards to the types of affective communication errors that engender ambivalent attachment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5886414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58864142018-04-20 Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators of attachment under active inference Cittern, David Nolte, Tobias Friston, Karl Edalat, Abbas PLoS One Research Article This paper addresses the formation of infant attachment types within the context of active inference: a holistic account of action, perception and learning in the brain. We show how the organised forms of attachment (secure, avoidant and ambivalent) might arise in (Bayesian) infants. Specifically, we show that these distinct forms of attachment emerge from a minimisation of free energy—over interoceptive states relating to internal stress levels—when seeking proximity to caregivers who have a varying impact on these interoceptive states. In line with empirical findings in disrupted patterns of affective communication, we then demonstrate how exteroceptive cues (in the form of caregiver-mediated AMBIANCE affective communication errors, ACE) can result in disorganised forms of attachment in infants of caregivers who consistently increase stress when the infant seeks proximity, but can have an organising (towards ambivalence) effect in infants of inconsistent caregivers. In particular, we differentiate disorganised attachment from avoidance in terms of the high epistemic value of proximity seeking behaviours (resulting from the caregiver’s misleading exteroceptive cues) that preclude the emergence of coherent and organised behavioural policies. Our work, the first to formulate infant attachment in terms of active inference, makes a new testable prediction with regards to the types of affective communication errors that engender ambivalent attachment. Public Library of Science 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5886414/ /pubmed/29621266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193955 Text en © 2018 Cittern et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cittern, David
Nolte, Tobias
Friston, Karl
Edalat, Abbas
Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators of attachment under active inference
title Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators of attachment under active inference
title_full Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators of attachment under active inference
title_fullStr Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators of attachment under active inference
title_full_unstemmed Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators of attachment under active inference
title_short Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators of attachment under active inference
title_sort intrinsic and extrinsic motivators of attachment under active inference
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193955
work_keys_str_mv AT citterndavid intrinsicandextrinsicmotivatorsofattachmentunderactiveinference
AT noltetobias intrinsicandextrinsicmotivatorsofattachmentunderactiveinference
AT fristonkarl intrinsicandextrinsicmotivatorsofattachmentunderactiveinference
AT edalatabbas intrinsicandextrinsicmotivatorsofattachmentunderactiveinference