Cargando…
Patient-important outcomes in systematic reviews: Poor quality of evidence
BACKGROUND: Cochrane reviewers are strongly encouraged to evaluate the quality of evidence for the most important outcomes by using the GRADE approach and to report these results in a Summary of Findings (SoF) table. We aimed to assess whether outcomes reported in the SoF table of Cochrane reviews c...
Autores principales: | Yordanov, Youri, Dechartres, Agnes, Ravaud, Philippe |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195460 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Avoidable waste of research related to outcome planning and reporting in clinical trials
por: Yordanov, Youri, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials
por: Yordanov, Youri, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Quality of Reporting of Bioequivalence Trials Comparing Generic to Brand Name Drugs: A Methodological Systematic Review
por: van der Meersch, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review
por: Ahmad, Nizar, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Better prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2015)