Cargando…

Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, reproducibility and sensitivity to respiratory gating, field strength and ventricle segmentation of hemodynamic force quantification in the left and right ventricles of the heart (LV and RV) using 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to provide free hem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Töger, Johannes, Arvidsson, Per M., Bock, Jelena, Kanski, Mikael, Pedrizzetti, Gianni, Carlsson, Marcus, Arheden, Håkan, Heiberg, Einar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195597
_version_ 1783312156963373056
author Töger, Johannes
Arvidsson, Per M.
Bock, Jelena
Kanski, Mikael
Pedrizzetti, Gianni
Carlsson, Marcus
Arheden, Håkan
Heiberg, Einar
author_facet Töger, Johannes
Arvidsson, Per M.
Bock, Jelena
Kanski, Mikael
Pedrizzetti, Gianni
Carlsson, Marcus
Arheden, Håkan
Heiberg, Einar
author_sort Töger, Johannes
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, reproducibility and sensitivity to respiratory gating, field strength and ventricle segmentation of hemodynamic force quantification in the left and right ventricles of the heart (LV and RV) using 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to provide free hemodynamic force analysis software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pulsatile flow phantom was imaged using 4D flow MRI and laser-based particle image velocimetry (PIV). Cardiac 4D flow MRI was performed in healthy volunteers at 1.5T (n = 23). Reproducibility was investigated using MR scanners from two different vendors on the same day (n = 8). Subsets of volunteers were also imaged without respiratory gating (n = 17), at 3T on the same day (n = 6), and 1–12 days later on the same scanner (n = 9, median 6 days). Agreement was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Phantom validation showed good accuracy for both scanners (Scanner 1: bias -14±9%, y = 0.82x+0.08, R(2) = 0.96, Scanner 2: bias -12±8%, y = 0.99x-0.08, R(2) = 1.00). Force reproducibility was strong in the LV (0.09±0.07 vs 0.09±0.07 N, bias 0.00±0.04 N, ICC = 0.87) and RV (0.09±0.06 vs 0.09±0.05 N, bias 0.00±0.03, ICC = 0.83). Strong to very strong agreement was found for scans with and without respiratory gating (LV/RV: ICC = 0.94/0.95), scans on different days (ICC = 0.92/0.87), and 1.5T and 3T scans (ICC = 0.93/0.94). CONCLUSION: Software for quantification of hemodynamic forces in 4D-flow MRI was developed, and results show high accuracy and strong to very strong reproducibility for both the LV and RV, supporting its use for research and clinical investigations. The software including source code is released freely for research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5886587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58865872018-04-20 Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software Töger, Johannes Arvidsson, Per M. Bock, Jelena Kanski, Mikael Pedrizzetti, Gianni Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Heiberg, Einar PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, reproducibility and sensitivity to respiratory gating, field strength and ventricle segmentation of hemodynamic force quantification in the left and right ventricles of the heart (LV and RV) using 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to provide free hemodynamic force analysis software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pulsatile flow phantom was imaged using 4D flow MRI and laser-based particle image velocimetry (PIV). Cardiac 4D flow MRI was performed in healthy volunteers at 1.5T (n = 23). Reproducibility was investigated using MR scanners from two different vendors on the same day (n = 8). Subsets of volunteers were also imaged without respiratory gating (n = 17), at 3T on the same day (n = 6), and 1–12 days later on the same scanner (n = 9, median 6 days). Agreement was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Phantom validation showed good accuracy for both scanners (Scanner 1: bias -14±9%, y = 0.82x+0.08, R(2) = 0.96, Scanner 2: bias -12±8%, y = 0.99x-0.08, R(2) = 1.00). Force reproducibility was strong in the LV (0.09±0.07 vs 0.09±0.07 N, bias 0.00±0.04 N, ICC = 0.87) and RV (0.09±0.06 vs 0.09±0.05 N, bias 0.00±0.03, ICC = 0.83). Strong to very strong agreement was found for scans with and without respiratory gating (LV/RV: ICC = 0.94/0.95), scans on different days (ICC = 0.92/0.87), and 1.5T and 3T scans (ICC = 0.93/0.94). CONCLUSION: Software for quantification of hemodynamic forces in 4D-flow MRI was developed, and results show high accuracy and strong to very strong reproducibility for both the LV and RV, supporting its use for research and clinical investigations. The software including source code is released freely for research. Public Library of Science 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5886587/ /pubmed/29621344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195597 Text en © 2018 Töger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Töger, Johannes
Arvidsson, Per M.
Bock, Jelena
Kanski, Mikael
Pedrizzetti, Gianni
Carlsson, Marcus
Arheden, Håkan
Heiberg, Einar
Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software
title Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software
title_full Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software
title_fullStr Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software
title_short Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software
title_sort hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4d flow magnetic resonance imaging: phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195597
work_keys_str_mv AT togerjohannes hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware
AT arvidssonperm hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware
AT bockjelena hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware
AT kanskimikael hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware
AT pedrizzettigianni hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware
AT carlssonmarcus hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware
AT arhedenhakan hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware
AT heibergeinar hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware