Cargando…
Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software
PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, reproducibility and sensitivity to respiratory gating, field strength and ventricle segmentation of hemodynamic force quantification in the left and right ventricles of the heart (LV and RV) using 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to provide free hem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195597 |
_version_ | 1783312156963373056 |
---|---|
author | Töger, Johannes Arvidsson, Per M. Bock, Jelena Kanski, Mikael Pedrizzetti, Gianni Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Heiberg, Einar |
author_facet | Töger, Johannes Arvidsson, Per M. Bock, Jelena Kanski, Mikael Pedrizzetti, Gianni Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Heiberg, Einar |
author_sort | Töger, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, reproducibility and sensitivity to respiratory gating, field strength and ventricle segmentation of hemodynamic force quantification in the left and right ventricles of the heart (LV and RV) using 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to provide free hemodynamic force analysis software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pulsatile flow phantom was imaged using 4D flow MRI and laser-based particle image velocimetry (PIV). Cardiac 4D flow MRI was performed in healthy volunteers at 1.5T (n = 23). Reproducibility was investigated using MR scanners from two different vendors on the same day (n = 8). Subsets of volunteers were also imaged without respiratory gating (n = 17), at 3T on the same day (n = 6), and 1–12 days later on the same scanner (n = 9, median 6 days). Agreement was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Phantom validation showed good accuracy for both scanners (Scanner 1: bias -14±9%, y = 0.82x+0.08, R(2) = 0.96, Scanner 2: bias -12±8%, y = 0.99x-0.08, R(2) = 1.00). Force reproducibility was strong in the LV (0.09±0.07 vs 0.09±0.07 N, bias 0.00±0.04 N, ICC = 0.87) and RV (0.09±0.06 vs 0.09±0.05 N, bias 0.00±0.03, ICC = 0.83). Strong to very strong agreement was found for scans with and without respiratory gating (LV/RV: ICC = 0.94/0.95), scans on different days (ICC = 0.92/0.87), and 1.5T and 3T scans (ICC = 0.93/0.94). CONCLUSION: Software for quantification of hemodynamic forces in 4D-flow MRI was developed, and results show high accuracy and strong to very strong reproducibility for both the LV and RV, supporting its use for research and clinical investigations. The software including source code is released freely for research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5886587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58865872018-04-20 Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software Töger, Johannes Arvidsson, Per M. Bock, Jelena Kanski, Mikael Pedrizzetti, Gianni Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Heiberg, Einar PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, reproducibility and sensitivity to respiratory gating, field strength and ventricle segmentation of hemodynamic force quantification in the left and right ventricles of the heart (LV and RV) using 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to provide free hemodynamic force analysis software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pulsatile flow phantom was imaged using 4D flow MRI and laser-based particle image velocimetry (PIV). Cardiac 4D flow MRI was performed in healthy volunteers at 1.5T (n = 23). Reproducibility was investigated using MR scanners from two different vendors on the same day (n = 8). Subsets of volunteers were also imaged without respiratory gating (n = 17), at 3T on the same day (n = 6), and 1–12 days later on the same scanner (n = 9, median 6 days). Agreement was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Phantom validation showed good accuracy for both scanners (Scanner 1: bias -14±9%, y = 0.82x+0.08, R(2) = 0.96, Scanner 2: bias -12±8%, y = 0.99x-0.08, R(2) = 1.00). Force reproducibility was strong in the LV (0.09±0.07 vs 0.09±0.07 N, bias 0.00±0.04 N, ICC = 0.87) and RV (0.09±0.06 vs 0.09±0.05 N, bias 0.00±0.03, ICC = 0.83). Strong to very strong agreement was found for scans with and without respiratory gating (LV/RV: ICC = 0.94/0.95), scans on different days (ICC = 0.92/0.87), and 1.5T and 3T scans (ICC = 0.93/0.94). CONCLUSION: Software for quantification of hemodynamic forces in 4D-flow MRI was developed, and results show high accuracy and strong to very strong reproducibility for both the LV and RV, supporting its use for research and clinical investigations. The software including source code is released freely for research. Public Library of Science 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5886587/ /pubmed/29621344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195597 Text en © 2018 Töger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Töger, Johannes Arvidsson, Per M. Bock, Jelena Kanski, Mikael Pedrizzetti, Gianni Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Heiberg, Einar Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software |
title | Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software |
title_full | Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software |
title_fullStr | Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software |
title_full_unstemmed | Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software |
title_short | Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software |
title_sort | hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4d flow magnetic resonance imaging: phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT togerjohannes hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware AT arvidssonperm hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware AT bockjelena hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware AT kanskimikael hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware AT pedrizzettigianni hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware AT carlssonmarcus hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware AT arhedenhakan hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware AT heibergeinar hemodynamicforcesintheleftandrightventriclesofthehumanheartusing4dflowmagneticresonanceimagingphantomvalidationreproducibilitysensitivitytorespiratorygatingandfreeanalysissoftware |