Cargando…
Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth
The present study evaluated auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation by determining the modulation depth required to detect modulation phase reversal. This approach may be preferable to spectral modulation detection with a spectrally flat standard, since listeners appear unable to perform the tas...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195686 |
_version_ | 1783312176504635392 |
---|---|
author | Buss, Emily Grose, John |
author_facet | Buss, Emily Grose, John |
author_sort | Buss, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study evaluated auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation by determining the modulation depth required to detect modulation phase reversal. This approach may be preferable to spectral modulation detection with a spectrally flat standard, since listeners appear unable to perform the task based on the detection of temporal modulation. While phase reversal thresholds are often evaluated by holding modulation depth constant and adjusting modulation rate, holding rate constant and adjusting modulation depth supports rate-specific assessment of modulation processing. Stimuli were pink noise samples, filtered into seven octave-wide bands (0.125–8 kHz) and spectrally modulated in dB. Experiment 1 measured performance as a function of modulation depth to determine appropriate units for adaptive threshold estimation. Experiment 2 compared thresholds in dB for modulation detection with a flat standard and modulation phase reversal; results supported the idea that temporal cues were available at high rates for the former but not the latter. Experiment 3 evaluated spectral modulation phase reversal thresholds for modulation that was restricted to either one or two neighboring bands. Flanking bands of unmodulated noise had a larger detrimental effect on one-band than two-band targets. Thresholds for high-rate modulation improved with increasing carrier frequency up to 2 kHz, whereas low-rate modulation appeared more consistent across frequency, particularly in the two-band condition. Experiment 4 measured spectral weights for spectral modulation phase reversal detection and found higher weights for bands in the spectral center of the stimulus than for the lowest (0.125 kHz) or highest (8 kHz) band. Experiment 5 compared performance for highly practiced and relatively naïve listeners, and found weak evidence of a larger practice effect at high than low spectral modulation rates. These results provide preliminary data for a task that may provide a better estimate of sensitivity to spectral modulation than spectral modulation detection with a flat standard. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5886689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58866892018-04-20 Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth Buss, Emily Grose, John PLoS One Research Article The present study evaluated auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation by determining the modulation depth required to detect modulation phase reversal. This approach may be preferable to spectral modulation detection with a spectrally flat standard, since listeners appear unable to perform the task based on the detection of temporal modulation. While phase reversal thresholds are often evaluated by holding modulation depth constant and adjusting modulation rate, holding rate constant and adjusting modulation depth supports rate-specific assessment of modulation processing. Stimuli were pink noise samples, filtered into seven octave-wide bands (0.125–8 kHz) and spectrally modulated in dB. Experiment 1 measured performance as a function of modulation depth to determine appropriate units for adaptive threshold estimation. Experiment 2 compared thresholds in dB for modulation detection with a flat standard and modulation phase reversal; results supported the idea that temporal cues were available at high rates for the former but not the latter. Experiment 3 evaluated spectral modulation phase reversal thresholds for modulation that was restricted to either one or two neighboring bands. Flanking bands of unmodulated noise had a larger detrimental effect on one-band than two-band targets. Thresholds for high-rate modulation improved with increasing carrier frequency up to 2 kHz, whereas low-rate modulation appeared more consistent across frequency, particularly in the two-band condition. Experiment 4 measured spectral weights for spectral modulation phase reversal detection and found higher weights for bands in the spectral center of the stimulus than for the lowest (0.125 kHz) or highest (8 kHz) band. Experiment 5 compared performance for highly practiced and relatively naïve listeners, and found weak evidence of a larger practice effect at high than low spectral modulation rates. These results provide preliminary data for a task that may provide a better estimate of sensitivity to spectral modulation than spectral modulation detection with a flat standard. Public Library of Science 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5886689/ /pubmed/29621338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195686 Text en © 2018 Buss, Grose http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Buss, Emily Grose, John Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth |
title | Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth |
title_full | Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth |
title_fullStr | Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth |
title_full_unstemmed | Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth |
title_short | Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth |
title_sort | auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bussemily auditorysensitivitytospectralmodulationphasereversalasafunctionofmodulationdepth AT grosejohn auditorysensitivitytospectralmodulationphasereversalasafunctionofmodulationdepth |