Cargando…

When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis

World Health Organization guidelines recommend that cervical cancer screening programs should prioritize screening coverage in women aged 30 to 49 years. Decisions about target ages and screening frequency depend upon local burden of disease, costs, and capacity. We used cost and test performance da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campos, Nicole G., Tsu, Vivien, Jeronimo, Jose, Mvundura, Mercy, Lee, Kyueun, Kim, Jane J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886851/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2015.05.003
_version_ 1783312184930992128
author Campos, Nicole G.
Tsu, Vivien
Jeronimo, Jose
Mvundura, Mercy
Lee, Kyueun
Kim, Jane J.
author_facet Campos, Nicole G.
Tsu, Vivien
Jeronimo, Jose
Mvundura, Mercy
Lee, Kyueun
Kim, Jane J.
author_sort Campos, Nicole G.
collection PubMed
description World Health Organization guidelines recommend that cervical cancer screening programs should prioritize screening coverage in women aged 30 to 49 years. Decisions about target ages and screening frequency depend upon local burden of disease, costs, and capacity. We used cost and test performance data from the START-UP demonstration projects in India, Nicaragua, and Uganda to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening at various start ages, intervals, and frequencies. We calibrated a mathematical simulation model of cervical carcinogenesis to each country and compared screening with careHPV (cervical and vaginal sampling), visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), and cytology between the ages of 25 and 50 years, at frequencies of once to three times in a lifetime, at 5- and 10-year intervals. Screening with careHPV (cervical sampling) was the most effective and cost-effective strategy in all settings; careHPV (vaginal sampling) was only slightly less effective. The most critical ages for screening are between ages 30 and 45 years. Within this age range, screening at certain ages may be relatively more cost-effective, but cancer risk reductions are similar for a given screening test and interval. Screening three times between 30 and 45 years was very cost-effective and reduced cancer risk by ~50%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5886851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58868512018-04-11 When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis Campos, Nicole G. Tsu, Vivien Jeronimo, Jose Mvundura, Mercy Lee, Kyueun Kim, Jane J. Papillomavirus Res Article World Health Organization guidelines recommend that cervical cancer screening programs should prioritize screening coverage in women aged 30 to 49 years. Decisions about target ages and screening frequency depend upon local burden of disease, costs, and capacity. We used cost and test performance data from the START-UP demonstration projects in India, Nicaragua, and Uganda to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening at various start ages, intervals, and frequencies. We calibrated a mathematical simulation model of cervical carcinogenesis to each country and compared screening with careHPV (cervical and vaginal sampling), visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), and cytology between the ages of 25 and 50 years, at frequencies of once to three times in a lifetime, at 5- and 10-year intervals. Screening with careHPV (cervical sampling) was the most effective and cost-effective strategy in all settings; careHPV (vaginal sampling) was only slightly less effective. The most critical ages for screening are between ages 30 and 45 years. Within this age range, screening at certain ages may be relatively more cost-effective, but cancer risk reductions are similar for a given screening test and interval. Screening three times between 30 and 45 years was very cost-effective and reduced cancer risk by ~50%. Elsevier 2015-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5886851/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2015.05.003 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Campos, Nicole G.
Tsu, Vivien
Jeronimo, Jose
Mvundura, Mercy
Lee, Kyueun
Kim, Jane J.
When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis
title When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort when and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886851/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2015.05.003
work_keys_str_mv AT camposnicoleg whenandhowoftentoscreenforcervicalcancerinthreelowandmiddleincomecountriesacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT tsuvivien whenandhowoftentoscreenforcervicalcancerinthreelowandmiddleincomecountriesacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT jeronimojose whenandhowoftentoscreenforcervicalcancerinthreelowandmiddleincomecountriesacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT mvunduramercy whenandhowoftentoscreenforcervicalcancerinthreelowandmiddleincomecountriesacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT leekyueun whenandhowoftentoscreenforcervicalcancerinthreelowandmiddleincomecountriesacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT kimjanej whenandhowoftentoscreenforcervicalcancerinthreelowandmiddleincomecountriesacosteffectivenessanalysis