Cargando…
Xpert human papillomavirus test is a promising cervical cancer screening test for HIV-seropositive women
This study investigated the performance of Cepheid Xpert human papillomavirus (HPV) assay in South African human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women and compared its performance with that of hybrid capture-2 (hc2). Methods: Stored cervical specimens from HIV-infected women that had previousl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29074186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2016.02.004 |
_version_ | 1783312186808991744 |
---|---|
author | Mbulawa, Zizipho Z.A. Wilkin, Timothy J. Goeieman, Bridgette Swarts, Avril Williams, Sophie Levin, Simon Faesen, Mark Smith, Jennifer S. Chibwesha, Carla J. Williamson, Anna-Lise Firnhaber, Cynthia |
author_facet | Mbulawa, Zizipho Z.A. Wilkin, Timothy J. Goeieman, Bridgette Swarts, Avril Williams, Sophie Levin, Simon Faesen, Mark Smith, Jennifer S. Chibwesha, Carla J. Williamson, Anna-Lise Firnhaber, Cynthia |
author_sort | Mbulawa, Zizipho Z.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated the performance of Cepheid Xpert human papillomavirus (HPV) assay in South African human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women and compared its performance with that of hybrid capture-2 (hc2). Methods: Stored cervical specimens from HIV-infected women that had previously been tested using hc2 were tested using Xpert. Results: The overall HR-HPV prevalence was found to be 62.0% (720/1161) by Xpert and 61.2% (711/1161) by hc2. 13.6% (158/1161) were HPV16 positive, 18.8% (218/1161) were HPV18/45, 37.3% (434/1161) were HPV31/33/35/52/58, 12.7% (147/1161) were HPV51/59 and 23.3% (270/1161) were HPV39/68/56/66. Overall agreement with hc2 was 90%; Cohen’s kappa was 0.78 (95% CI 0.74–0.82) indicating substantial agreement. Detection of HPV16, HPV18/45, and HPV31/33/35/52/58 were independently associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)−2+ (P<0.0001 for each); while HPV51/59 and HPV39/68/56/66 were not. Women infected with HPV16, HPV18/45 or HPV31/33/35/52/58 were found to have significantly higher amounts of HPV DNA detected for those with CIN2+ compared to those without CIN2+, P<0.0001 for each. Xpert and hc2 were similarly sensitive (88.3% and 91.5%, respectively) and specific (48.4% and 51.0%) for CIN2+ and CIN3 (sensitivity: 95.8% and 97.9%; specificity: 41.4% and 42.8%). Conclusions: Xpert is a promising screening test in HIV-infected women that performs similarly to hc2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5886871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58868712018-04-11 Xpert human papillomavirus test is a promising cervical cancer screening test for HIV-seropositive women Mbulawa, Zizipho Z.A. Wilkin, Timothy J. Goeieman, Bridgette Swarts, Avril Williams, Sophie Levin, Simon Faesen, Mark Smith, Jennifer S. Chibwesha, Carla J. Williamson, Anna-Lise Firnhaber, Cynthia Papillomavirus Res Article This study investigated the performance of Cepheid Xpert human papillomavirus (HPV) assay in South African human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women and compared its performance with that of hybrid capture-2 (hc2). Methods: Stored cervical specimens from HIV-infected women that had previously been tested using hc2 were tested using Xpert. Results: The overall HR-HPV prevalence was found to be 62.0% (720/1161) by Xpert and 61.2% (711/1161) by hc2. 13.6% (158/1161) were HPV16 positive, 18.8% (218/1161) were HPV18/45, 37.3% (434/1161) were HPV31/33/35/52/58, 12.7% (147/1161) were HPV51/59 and 23.3% (270/1161) were HPV39/68/56/66. Overall agreement with hc2 was 90%; Cohen’s kappa was 0.78 (95% CI 0.74–0.82) indicating substantial agreement. Detection of HPV16, HPV18/45, and HPV31/33/35/52/58 were independently associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)−2+ (P<0.0001 for each); while HPV51/59 and HPV39/68/56/66 were not. Women infected with HPV16, HPV18/45 or HPV31/33/35/52/58 were found to have significantly higher amounts of HPV DNA detected for those with CIN2+ compared to those without CIN2+, P<0.0001 for each. Xpert and hc2 were similarly sensitive (88.3% and 91.5%, respectively) and specific (48.4% and 51.0%) for CIN2+ and CIN3 (sensitivity: 95.8% and 97.9%; specificity: 41.4% and 42.8%). Conclusions: Xpert is a promising screening test in HIV-infected women that performs similarly to hc2. Elsevier 2016-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5886871/ /pubmed/29074186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2016.02.004 Text en © 2016 The Auhtors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mbulawa, Zizipho Z.A. Wilkin, Timothy J. Goeieman, Bridgette Swarts, Avril Williams, Sophie Levin, Simon Faesen, Mark Smith, Jennifer S. Chibwesha, Carla J. Williamson, Anna-Lise Firnhaber, Cynthia Xpert human papillomavirus test is a promising cervical cancer screening test for HIV-seropositive women |
title | Xpert human papillomavirus test is a promising cervical cancer screening test for HIV-seropositive women |
title_full | Xpert human papillomavirus test is a promising cervical cancer screening test for HIV-seropositive women |
title_fullStr | Xpert human papillomavirus test is a promising cervical cancer screening test for HIV-seropositive women |
title_full_unstemmed | Xpert human papillomavirus test is a promising cervical cancer screening test for HIV-seropositive women |
title_short | Xpert human papillomavirus test is a promising cervical cancer screening test for HIV-seropositive women |
title_sort | xpert human papillomavirus test is a promising cervical cancer screening test for hiv-seropositive women |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29074186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2016.02.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mbulawaziziphoza xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen AT wilkintimothyj xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen AT goeiemanbridgette xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen AT swartsavril xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen AT williamssophie xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen AT levinsimon xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen AT faesenmark xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen AT smithjennifers xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen AT chibweshacarlaj xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen AT williamsonannalise xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen AT firnhabercynthia xperthumanpapillomavirustestisapromisingcervicalcancerscreeningtestforhivseropositivewomen |