Cargando…
Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography
BACKGROUND: Simpson biplane method and 3D by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), radionuclide angiography (RNA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are the most accepted techniques for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Wall motion score index (WMSI) by TTE is an accept...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bioscientifica Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0006 |
_version_ | 1783312221660512256 |
---|---|
author | Lebeau, Real Serri, Karim Lorenzo, Maria Di Sauvé, Claude Le, Van Hoai Viet Soulières, Vicky El-Rayes, Malak Pagé, Maude Zaïani, Chimène Garot, Jérôme Poulin, Frédéric |
author_facet | Lebeau, Real Serri, Karim Lorenzo, Maria Di Sauvé, Claude Le, Van Hoai Viet Soulières, Vicky El-Rayes, Malak Pagé, Maude Zaïani, Chimène Garot, Jérôme Poulin, Frédéric |
author_sort | Lebeau, Real |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Simpson biplane method and 3D by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), radionuclide angiography (RNA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are the most accepted techniques for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Wall motion score index (WMSI) by TTE is an accepted complement. However, the conversion from WMSI to LVEF is obtained through a regression equation, which may limit its use. In this retrospective study, we aimed to validate a new method to derive LVEF from the wall motion score in 95 patients. METHODS: The new score consisted of attributing a segmental EF to each LV segment based on the wall motion score and averaging all 16 segmental EF into a global LVEF. This segmental EF score was calculated on TTE in 95 patients, and RNA was used as the reference LVEF method. LVEF using the new segmental EF 15-40-65 score on TTE was compared to the reference methods using linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses. RESULTS: The median LVEF was 45% (interquartile range 32–53%; range from 15 to 65%). Our new segmental EF 15-40-65 score derived on TTE correlated strongly with RNA-LVEF (r = 0.97). Overall, the new score resulted in good agreement of LVEF compared to RNA (mean bias 0.61%). The standard deviations (s.d.s) of the distributions of inter-method difference for the comparison of the new score with RNA were 6.2%, indicating good precision. CONCLUSION: LVEF assessment using segmental EF derived from the wall motion score applied to each of the 16 LV segments has excellent correlation and agreement with a reference method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5887066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Bioscientifica Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58870662018-04-09 Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography Lebeau, Real Serri, Karim Lorenzo, Maria Di Sauvé, Claude Le, Van Hoai Viet Soulières, Vicky El-Rayes, Malak Pagé, Maude Zaïani, Chimène Garot, Jérôme Poulin, Frédéric Echo Res Pract Research BACKGROUND: Simpson biplane method and 3D by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), radionuclide angiography (RNA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are the most accepted techniques for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Wall motion score index (WMSI) by TTE is an accepted complement. However, the conversion from WMSI to LVEF is obtained through a regression equation, which may limit its use. In this retrospective study, we aimed to validate a new method to derive LVEF from the wall motion score in 95 patients. METHODS: The new score consisted of attributing a segmental EF to each LV segment based on the wall motion score and averaging all 16 segmental EF into a global LVEF. This segmental EF score was calculated on TTE in 95 patients, and RNA was used as the reference LVEF method. LVEF using the new segmental EF 15-40-65 score on TTE was compared to the reference methods using linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses. RESULTS: The median LVEF was 45% (interquartile range 32–53%; range from 15 to 65%). Our new segmental EF 15-40-65 score derived on TTE correlated strongly with RNA-LVEF (r = 0.97). Overall, the new score resulted in good agreement of LVEF compared to RNA (mean bias 0.61%). The standard deviations (s.d.s) of the distributions of inter-method difference for the comparison of the new score with RNA were 6.2%, indicating good precision. CONCLUSION: LVEF assessment using segmental EF derived from the wall motion score applied to each of the 16 LV segments has excellent correlation and agreement with a reference method. Bioscientifica Ltd 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5887066/ /pubmed/29628446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0006 Text en © 2018 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Lebeau, Real Serri, Karim Lorenzo, Maria Di Sauvé, Claude Le, Van Hoai Viet Soulières, Vicky El-Rayes, Malak Pagé, Maude Zaïani, Chimène Garot, Jérôme Poulin, Frédéric Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography |
title | Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography |
title_full | Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography |
title_fullStr | Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography |
title_short | Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography |
title_sort | assessment of lvef using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lebeaureal assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography AT serrikarim assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography AT lorenzomariadi assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography AT sauveclaude assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography AT levanhoaiviet assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography AT soulieresvicky assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography AT elrayesmalak assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography AT pagemaude assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography AT zaianichimene assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography AT garotjerome assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography AT poulinfrederic assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography |