Cargando…

Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Simpson biplane method and 3D by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), radionuclide angiography (RNA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are the most accepted techniques for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Wall motion score index (WMSI) by TTE is an accept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lebeau, Real, Serri, Karim, Lorenzo, Maria Di, Sauvé, Claude, Le, Van Hoai Viet, Soulières, Vicky, El-Rayes, Malak, Pagé, Maude, Zaïani, Chimène, Garot, Jérôme, Poulin, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0006
_version_ 1783312221660512256
author Lebeau, Real
Serri, Karim
Lorenzo, Maria Di
Sauvé, Claude
Le, Van Hoai Viet
Soulières, Vicky
El-Rayes, Malak
Pagé, Maude
Zaïani, Chimène
Garot, Jérôme
Poulin, Frédéric
author_facet Lebeau, Real
Serri, Karim
Lorenzo, Maria Di
Sauvé, Claude
Le, Van Hoai Viet
Soulières, Vicky
El-Rayes, Malak
Pagé, Maude
Zaïani, Chimène
Garot, Jérôme
Poulin, Frédéric
author_sort Lebeau, Real
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Simpson biplane method and 3D by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), radionuclide angiography (RNA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are the most accepted techniques for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Wall motion score index (WMSI) by TTE is an accepted complement. However, the conversion from WMSI to LVEF is obtained through a regression equation, which may limit its use. In this retrospective study, we aimed to validate a new method to derive LVEF from the wall motion score in 95 patients. METHODS: The new score consisted of attributing a segmental EF to each LV segment based on the wall motion score and averaging all 16 segmental EF into a global LVEF. This segmental EF score was calculated on TTE in 95 patients, and RNA was used as the reference LVEF method. LVEF using the new segmental EF 15-40-65 score on TTE was compared to the reference methods using linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses. RESULTS: The median LVEF was 45% (interquartile range 32–53%; range from 15 to 65%). Our new segmental EF 15-40-65 score derived on TTE correlated strongly with RNA-LVEF (r = 0.97). Overall, the new score resulted in good agreement of LVEF compared to RNA (mean bias 0.61%). The standard deviations (s.d.s) of the distributions of inter-method difference for the comparison of the new score with RNA were 6.2%, indicating good precision. CONCLUSION: LVEF assessment using segmental EF derived from the wall motion score applied to each of the 16 LV segments has excellent correlation and agreement with a reference method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5887066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58870662018-04-09 Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography Lebeau, Real Serri, Karim Lorenzo, Maria Di Sauvé, Claude Le, Van Hoai Viet Soulières, Vicky El-Rayes, Malak Pagé, Maude Zaïani, Chimène Garot, Jérôme Poulin, Frédéric Echo Res Pract Research BACKGROUND: Simpson biplane method and 3D by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), radionuclide angiography (RNA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are the most accepted techniques for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Wall motion score index (WMSI) by TTE is an accepted complement. However, the conversion from WMSI to LVEF is obtained through a regression equation, which may limit its use. In this retrospective study, we aimed to validate a new method to derive LVEF from the wall motion score in 95 patients. METHODS: The new score consisted of attributing a segmental EF to each LV segment based on the wall motion score and averaging all 16 segmental EF into a global LVEF. This segmental EF score was calculated on TTE in 95 patients, and RNA was used as the reference LVEF method. LVEF using the new segmental EF 15-40-65 score on TTE was compared to the reference methods using linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses. RESULTS: The median LVEF was 45% (interquartile range 32–53%; range from 15 to 65%). Our new segmental EF 15-40-65 score derived on TTE correlated strongly with RNA-LVEF (r = 0.97). Overall, the new score resulted in good agreement of LVEF compared to RNA (mean bias 0.61%). The standard deviations (s.d.s) of the distributions of inter-method difference for the comparison of the new score with RNA were 6.2%, indicating good precision. CONCLUSION: LVEF assessment using segmental EF derived from the wall motion score applied to each of the 16 LV segments has excellent correlation and agreement with a reference method. Bioscientifica Ltd 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5887066/ /pubmed/29628446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0006 Text en © 2018 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Lebeau, Real
Serri, Karim
Lorenzo, Maria Di
Sauvé, Claude
Le, Van Hoai Viet
Soulières, Vicky
El-Rayes, Malak
Pagé, Maude
Zaïani, Chimène
Garot, Jérôme
Poulin, Frédéric
Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography
title Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography
title_full Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography
title_fullStr Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography
title_short Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography
title_sort assessment of lvef using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0006
work_keys_str_mv AT lebeaureal assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography
AT serrikarim assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography
AT lorenzomariadi assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography
AT sauveclaude assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography
AT levanhoaiviet assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography
AT soulieresvicky assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography
AT elrayesmalak assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography
AT pagemaude assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography
AT zaianichimene assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography
AT garotjerome assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography
AT poulinfrederic assessmentoflvefusinganew16segmentwallmotionscoreinechocardiography