Cargando…
Empathy is proprioceptive: the bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical education
BACKGROUND: The current philosophical debate on empathy entails accounts of theory of mind and simulation as well as a phenomenological opposition. The first focuses on a detached observation of others from a 3rd person perspective and formulates the common claim that there is no direct access to th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29622015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1161-y |
_version_ | 1783312250828750848 |
---|---|
author | Schmidsberger, Florian Löffler-Stastka, Henriette |
author_facet | Schmidsberger, Florian Löffler-Stastka, Henriette |
author_sort | Schmidsberger, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The current philosophical debate on empathy entails accounts of theory of mind and simulation as well as a phenomenological opposition. The first focuses on a detached observation of others from a 3rd person perspective and formulates the common claim that there is no direct access to the mental and emotional life of others, only simulation or analogy can grant access to the emotions and behaviour of others. The philosophical respectively phenomenological account of Fuchs instead opposes by focusing personal interaction within a 1st or 2nd person perspective claiming that the emotions of others are experienceable through bodily expression and bodily resonance. Fuchs offers an account of embodied affectivity that emphasizes the role of the (subjective) body for emotion and empathy. By experiencing the bodily expressed emotions of a vis-à-vis with and through the own body empathy and social understanding are bodily grounded. Following this core thesis Fuchs differentiates a primary, bodily empathy and an extended empathy that focuses on putting myself in the shoes of others (perspective taking). DISCUSSION: By comparison of different forms of social understanding as discussed in the phenomenological tradition – like contagion, sharing and empathy – it can be shown that extended empathy has an egocentric character. By putting myself in the shoes of others I miss a person’s otherness that transcends my capacity of imagination respectively the personal frame of my experience. Further Fuchs’ disregards that a bodily based empathy is co-structured by higher level form of understanding like contextual biographic knowledge. CONCLUSION: The philosophical discussion offers fertile impulses for Medical Education (ME) and the training of empathic communication skills. The account of Fuchs highlights the role of bodily perception (proprioception) as a resource of understanding others. Thus proprioceptive skills of a physician can support the empathic understanding of the physician. The objection against the egocentric trait of perspective taking admonishes not to generalize the own perspective as decisive for empathy and to adopt an attitude that remains open to the otherness of a patient and its experiences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5887217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58872172018-04-09 Empathy is proprioceptive: the bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical education Schmidsberger, Florian Löffler-Stastka, Henriette BMC Med Educ Debate BACKGROUND: The current philosophical debate on empathy entails accounts of theory of mind and simulation as well as a phenomenological opposition. The first focuses on a detached observation of others from a 3rd person perspective and formulates the common claim that there is no direct access to the mental and emotional life of others, only simulation or analogy can grant access to the emotions and behaviour of others. The philosophical respectively phenomenological account of Fuchs instead opposes by focusing personal interaction within a 1st or 2nd person perspective claiming that the emotions of others are experienceable through bodily expression and bodily resonance. Fuchs offers an account of embodied affectivity that emphasizes the role of the (subjective) body for emotion and empathy. By experiencing the bodily expressed emotions of a vis-à-vis with and through the own body empathy and social understanding are bodily grounded. Following this core thesis Fuchs differentiates a primary, bodily empathy and an extended empathy that focuses on putting myself in the shoes of others (perspective taking). DISCUSSION: By comparison of different forms of social understanding as discussed in the phenomenological tradition – like contagion, sharing and empathy – it can be shown that extended empathy has an egocentric character. By putting myself in the shoes of others I miss a person’s otherness that transcends my capacity of imagination respectively the personal frame of my experience. Further Fuchs’ disregards that a bodily based empathy is co-structured by higher level form of understanding like contextual biographic knowledge. CONCLUSION: The philosophical discussion offers fertile impulses for Medical Education (ME) and the training of empathic communication skills. The account of Fuchs highlights the role of bodily perception (proprioception) as a resource of understanding others. Thus proprioceptive skills of a physician can support the empathic understanding of the physician. The objection against the egocentric trait of perspective taking admonishes not to generalize the own perspective as decisive for empathy and to adopt an attitude that remains open to the otherness of a patient and its experiences. BioMed Central 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5887217/ /pubmed/29622015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1161-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Debate Schmidsberger, Florian Löffler-Stastka, Henriette Empathy is proprioceptive: the bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical education |
title | Empathy is proprioceptive: the bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical education |
title_full | Empathy is proprioceptive: the bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical education |
title_fullStr | Empathy is proprioceptive: the bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical education |
title_full_unstemmed | Empathy is proprioceptive: the bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical education |
title_short | Empathy is proprioceptive: the bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical education |
title_sort | empathy is proprioceptive: the bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical education |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29622015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1161-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidsbergerflorian empathyisproprioceptivethebodilyfundamentofempathyaphilosophicalcontributiontomedicaleducation AT lofflerstastkahenriette empathyisproprioceptivethebodilyfundamentofempathyaphilosophicalcontributiontomedicaleducation |