Cargando…

An in vitro comparison of standard cleaning to a continuous passive disinfection cap for the decontamination of needle-free connectors

BACKGROUND: The optimal decontamination method for needle-free connectors is still unresolved. The objective of this study was to determine if a continuous passive disinfection cap is as effective as standard cleaning for the microbial decontamination of injection ports of two types of needle-free c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casey, Anna L., Karpanen, Tarja J., Nightingale, Peter, Elliott, Tom S. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0342-0
_version_ 1783312251054194688
author Casey, Anna L.
Karpanen, Tarja J.
Nightingale, Peter
Elliott, Tom S. J.
author_facet Casey, Anna L.
Karpanen, Tarja J.
Nightingale, Peter
Elliott, Tom S. J.
author_sort Casey, Anna L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal decontamination method for needle-free connectors is still unresolved. The objective of this study was to determine if a continuous passive disinfection cap is as effective as standard cleaning for the microbial decontamination of injection ports of two types of needle-free connectors. METHODS: The injection ports of needle-free connectors were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus and allowed to dry. Disinfection caps containing 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol (IPA) were attached to the connectors for one, three or 7 days and were compared with needle-free connectors cleaned with 2% (w/v) chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) in 70% (v/v) IPA. The number of S. aureus remaining on the injection ports was evaluated. Median log(10) reductions and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and data analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The application of the disinfection cap resulted in a significantly higher reduction in S. aureus than the 2% (w/v) CHG in 70% (v/v) IPA wipe, achieving a > 5 Log(10) reduction in CFU at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: The disinfection caps resulted in a significantly higher reduction in S.aureus on the injection ports when compared to the use of a 2% (w/v) CHG in 70% (v/v) IPA wipe. This offers an explanation for the lower rates of central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) associated with the use of disinfection caps reported in clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5887218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58872182018-04-09 An in vitro comparison of standard cleaning to a continuous passive disinfection cap for the decontamination of needle-free connectors Casey, Anna L. Karpanen, Tarja J. Nightingale, Peter Elliott, Tom S. J. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: The optimal decontamination method for needle-free connectors is still unresolved. The objective of this study was to determine if a continuous passive disinfection cap is as effective as standard cleaning for the microbial decontamination of injection ports of two types of needle-free connectors. METHODS: The injection ports of needle-free connectors were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus and allowed to dry. Disinfection caps containing 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol (IPA) were attached to the connectors for one, three or 7 days and were compared with needle-free connectors cleaned with 2% (w/v) chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) in 70% (v/v) IPA. The number of S. aureus remaining on the injection ports was evaluated. Median log(10) reductions and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and data analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The application of the disinfection cap resulted in a significantly higher reduction in S. aureus than the 2% (w/v) CHG in 70% (v/v) IPA wipe, achieving a > 5 Log(10) reduction in CFU at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: The disinfection caps resulted in a significantly higher reduction in S.aureus on the injection ports when compared to the use of a 2% (w/v) CHG in 70% (v/v) IPA wipe. This offers an explanation for the lower rates of central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) associated with the use of disinfection caps reported in clinical studies. BioMed Central 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5887218/ /pubmed/29632665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0342-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Casey, Anna L.
Karpanen, Tarja J.
Nightingale, Peter
Elliott, Tom S. J.
An in vitro comparison of standard cleaning to a continuous passive disinfection cap for the decontamination of needle-free connectors
title An in vitro comparison of standard cleaning to a continuous passive disinfection cap for the decontamination of needle-free connectors
title_full An in vitro comparison of standard cleaning to a continuous passive disinfection cap for the decontamination of needle-free connectors
title_fullStr An in vitro comparison of standard cleaning to a continuous passive disinfection cap for the decontamination of needle-free connectors
title_full_unstemmed An in vitro comparison of standard cleaning to a continuous passive disinfection cap for the decontamination of needle-free connectors
title_short An in vitro comparison of standard cleaning to a continuous passive disinfection cap for the decontamination of needle-free connectors
title_sort in vitro comparison of standard cleaning to a continuous passive disinfection cap for the decontamination of needle-free connectors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0342-0
work_keys_str_mv AT caseyannal aninvitrocomparisonofstandardcleaningtoacontinuouspassivedisinfectioncapforthedecontaminationofneedlefreeconnectors
AT karpanentarjaj aninvitrocomparisonofstandardcleaningtoacontinuouspassivedisinfectioncapforthedecontaminationofneedlefreeconnectors
AT nightingalepeter aninvitrocomparisonofstandardcleaningtoacontinuouspassivedisinfectioncapforthedecontaminationofneedlefreeconnectors
AT elliotttomsj aninvitrocomparisonofstandardcleaningtoacontinuouspassivedisinfectioncapforthedecontaminationofneedlefreeconnectors
AT caseyannal invitrocomparisonofstandardcleaningtoacontinuouspassivedisinfectioncapforthedecontaminationofneedlefreeconnectors
AT karpanentarjaj invitrocomparisonofstandardcleaningtoacontinuouspassivedisinfectioncapforthedecontaminationofneedlefreeconnectors
AT nightingalepeter invitrocomparisonofstandardcleaningtoacontinuouspassivedisinfectioncapforthedecontaminationofneedlefreeconnectors
AT elliotttomsj invitrocomparisonofstandardcleaningtoacontinuouspassivedisinfectioncapforthedecontaminationofneedlefreeconnectors