Cargando…

O2.8. TRAJECTORIES OF NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OVER TIME IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK WHO DO AND DO NOT TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS

BACKGROUND: In spite of evidence for the premorbid and prodromal onset of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, there is some limited evidence to suggest that deficits may progress with psychosis onset. Cognitive remediation in youth at risk for psychosis is being tout...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodberry, Kristen, Stone, William S, Shapiro, Daniel I, Chokran, Cole M, Addington, Jean, Bearden, Carrie, Cadenhead, Kristin, Cannon, Tyrone D, Cornblatt, Barbara A, McGlashan, Thomas H, Mathalon, Daniel H, Perkins, Diana O, Tsuang, Ming T, Walker, Elaine F, Woods, Scott W, Seidman, Larry J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887340/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby015.198
_version_ 1783312279797760000
author Woodberry, Kristen
Stone, William S
Shapiro, Daniel I
Chokran, Cole M
Addington, Jean
Bearden, Carrie
Cadenhead, Kristin
Cannon, Tyrone D
Cornblatt, Barbara A
McGlashan, Thomas H
Mathalon, Daniel H
Perkins, Diana O
Tsuang, Ming T
Walker, Elaine F
Woods, Scott W
Seidman, Larry J
author_facet Woodberry, Kristen
Stone, William S
Shapiro, Daniel I
Chokran, Cole M
Addington, Jean
Bearden, Carrie
Cadenhead, Kristin
Cannon, Tyrone D
Cornblatt, Barbara A
McGlashan, Thomas H
Mathalon, Daniel H
Perkins, Diana O
Tsuang, Ming T
Walker, Elaine F
Woods, Scott W
Seidman, Larry J
author_sort Woodberry, Kristen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In spite of evidence for the premorbid and prodromal onset of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, there is some limited evidence to suggest that deficits may progress with psychosis onset. Cognitive remediation in youth at risk for psychosis is being touted as an opportunity not only to remediate deficits but to potentially prevent this progression. Yet trajectories of cognitive functioning over time remain poorly understood in youth at risk, including the degree to which age at assessment or illness onset, sociodemographic factors, or symptom progression influence these trajectories. METHODS: The North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS) -2 collected data on an extensive battery of neuropsychological (NP) tests at baseline, one year, two years, and post-conversion in a sample of clinical high risk (CHR) youth and healthy comparison (HC) subjects ages 12–35 (N= 960, 92% of the full sample) followed clinically for up to 2 years. NP data were available for 694 at CHR and 265 HC. Linear mixed effects analyses were used to test the effects of group, age, gender, age of onset, maternal education, and clinical outcome on cognitive trajectories. RESULTS: Those who transitioned to a psychotic disorder over the course of follow-up performed significantly below those who did not and well below healthy comparisons. Tasks reliant on attention, visual and auditory working memory, visuospatial and verbal memory, and processing speed best differentiated those who transitioned from those who did not at one year (Cohen’s d from -0.33 to -0.54). Discrepancies from normal functioning on these tests were generally large (Cohen’s d from -0.67 to -1.02) consistent with findings for first episode samples. Although clinical outcome was not associated with a significantly different trajectory over time on any cognitive domain, these are likely due to high rates of conversion in this sample within the first year. Predictors of different trajectories will be presented. DISCUSSION: These data from one of the largest CHR studies to date suggest that much of the neuropsychological dysfunction in major psychotic disorders is present early in the course of illness and prior to its full expression. However, trajectories are highly heterogeneous. More frequent assessment prior to and during the onset of illness are needed to fully understand the cognitive correlates of psychosis onset and the implications for early intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5887340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58873402018-04-11 O2.8. TRAJECTORIES OF NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OVER TIME IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK WHO DO AND DO NOT TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS Woodberry, Kristen Stone, William S Shapiro, Daniel I Chokran, Cole M Addington, Jean Bearden, Carrie Cadenhead, Kristin Cannon, Tyrone D Cornblatt, Barbara A McGlashan, Thomas H Mathalon, Daniel H Perkins, Diana O Tsuang, Ming T Walker, Elaine F Woods, Scott W Seidman, Larry J Schizophr Bull Abstracts BACKGROUND: In spite of evidence for the premorbid and prodromal onset of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, there is some limited evidence to suggest that deficits may progress with psychosis onset. Cognitive remediation in youth at risk for psychosis is being touted as an opportunity not only to remediate deficits but to potentially prevent this progression. Yet trajectories of cognitive functioning over time remain poorly understood in youth at risk, including the degree to which age at assessment or illness onset, sociodemographic factors, or symptom progression influence these trajectories. METHODS: The North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS) -2 collected data on an extensive battery of neuropsychological (NP) tests at baseline, one year, two years, and post-conversion in a sample of clinical high risk (CHR) youth and healthy comparison (HC) subjects ages 12–35 (N= 960, 92% of the full sample) followed clinically for up to 2 years. NP data were available for 694 at CHR and 265 HC. Linear mixed effects analyses were used to test the effects of group, age, gender, age of onset, maternal education, and clinical outcome on cognitive trajectories. RESULTS: Those who transitioned to a psychotic disorder over the course of follow-up performed significantly below those who did not and well below healthy comparisons. Tasks reliant on attention, visual and auditory working memory, visuospatial and verbal memory, and processing speed best differentiated those who transitioned from those who did not at one year (Cohen’s d from -0.33 to -0.54). Discrepancies from normal functioning on these tests were generally large (Cohen’s d from -0.67 to -1.02) consistent with findings for first episode samples. Although clinical outcome was not associated with a significantly different trajectory over time on any cognitive domain, these are likely due to high rates of conversion in this sample within the first year. Predictors of different trajectories will be presented. DISCUSSION: These data from one of the largest CHR studies to date suggest that much of the neuropsychological dysfunction in major psychotic disorders is present early in the course of illness and prior to its full expression. However, trajectories are highly heterogeneous. More frequent assessment prior to and during the onset of illness are needed to fully understand the cognitive correlates of psychosis onset and the implications for early intervention. Oxford University Press 2018-04 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5887340/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby015.198 Text en © Maryland Psychiatric Research Center 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Woodberry, Kristen
Stone, William S
Shapiro, Daniel I
Chokran, Cole M
Addington, Jean
Bearden, Carrie
Cadenhead, Kristin
Cannon, Tyrone D
Cornblatt, Barbara A
McGlashan, Thomas H
Mathalon, Daniel H
Perkins, Diana O
Tsuang, Ming T
Walker, Elaine F
Woods, Scott W
Seidman, Larry J
O2.8. TRAJECTORIES OF NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OVER TIME IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK WHO DO AND DO NOT TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS
title O2.8. TRAJECTORIES OF NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OVER TIME IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK WHO DO AND DO NOT TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS
title_full O2.8. TRAJECTORIES OF NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OVER TIME IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK WHO DO AND DO NOT TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS
title_fullStr O2.8. TRAJECTORIES OF NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OVER TIME IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK WHO DO AND DO NOT TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS
title_full_unstemmed O2.8. TRAJECTORIES OF NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OVER TIME IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK WHO DO AND DO NOT TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS
title_short O2.8. TRAJECTORIES OF NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OVER TIME IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK WHO DO AND DO NOT TRANSITION TO PSYCHOSIS
title_sort o2.8. trajectories of neurocognitive functioning over time in youth at clinical high risk who do and do not transition to psychosis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887340/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby015.198
work_keys_str_mv AT woodberrykristen o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT stonewilliams o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT shapirodanieli o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT chokrancolem o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT addingtonjean o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT beardencarrie o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT cadenheadkristin o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT cannontyroned o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT cornblattbarbaraa o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT mcglashanthomash o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT mathalondanielh o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT perkinsdianao o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT tsuangmingt o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT walkerelainef o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT woodsscottw o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis
AT seidmanlarryj o28trajectoriesofneurocognitivefunctioningovertimeinyouthatclinicalhighriskwhodoanddonottransitiontopsychosis