Cargando…
Clinical indicators of hemorrhagic shock in pregnancy
BACKGROUND: Several hemodynamic parameters have been promoted to help establish a rapid diagnosis of hemorrhagic shock, but they have not been well validated in the pregnant population. In this study, we examined the association between three measures of shock and early blood transfusion requirement...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000112 |
_version_ | 1783312336226877440 |
---|---|
author | Jenkins, Peter C Stokes, Samantha M Fakoyeho, Stephen Bell, Teresa M Zarzaur, Ben L |
author_facet | Jenkins, Peter C Stokes, Samantha M Fakoyeho, Stephen Bell, Teresa M Zarzaur, Ben L |
author_sort | Jenkins, Peter C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several hemodynamic parameters have been promoted to help establish a rapid diagnosis of hemorrhagic shock, but they have not been well validated in the pregnant population. In this study, we examined the association between three measures of shock and early blood transfusion requirements among pregnant trauma patients. METHODS: This study included 81 pregnant trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center (2010–2015). In separate logistic regression models, we tested the relationship between exposure variables—initial systolic blood pressure (SBP), shock index (SI), and rate over pressure evaluation (ROPE)—and the outcome of transfusion of blood products within 24 hours of admission. To test the predictive ability of each measure, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: A total of 10% of patients received blood products in the patient cohort. No patients had an initial SBP≤90, so the SBP measure was excluded from analysis. We found that patients with SI>1 were significantly more likely to receive blood transfusions compared with patients with SI<1 (OR 10.35; 95% CI 1.80 to 59.62), whereas ROPE>3 was not associated with blood transfusion compared with ROPE≤3 (OR 2.92; 95% CI 0.28 to 30.42). Furthermore, comparison of area under the ROC curve for SI (0.68) and ROPE (0.54) suggested that SI was more predictive than ROPE of blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: We found that an elevated SI was more closely associated with early blood product transfusion than SBP and ROPE in injured pregnant patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level III |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5887580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58875802018-05-14 Clinical indicators of hemorrhagic shock in pregnancy Jenkins, Peter C Stokes, Samantha M Fakoyeho, Stephen Bell, Teresa M Zarzaur, Ben L Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Brief Report BACKGROUND: Several hemodynamic parameters have been promoted to help establish a rapid diagnosis of hemorrhagic shock, but they have not been well validated in the pregnant population. In this study, we examined the association between three measures of shock and early blood transfusion requirements among pregnant trauma patients. METHODS: This study included 81 pregnant trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center (2010–2015). In separate logistic regression models, we tested the relationship between exposure variables—initial systolic blood pressure (SBP), shock index (SI), and rate over pressure evaluation (ROPE)—and the outcome of transfusion of blood products within 24 hours of admission. To test the predictive ability of each measure, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: A total of 10% of patients received blood products in the patient cohort. No patients had an initial SBP≤90, so the SBP measure was excluded from analysis. We found that patients with SI>1 were significantly more likely to receive blood transfusions compared with patients with SI<1 (OR 10.35; 95% CI 1.80 to 59.62), whereas ROPE>3 was not associated with blood transfusion compared with ROPE≤3 (OR 2.92; 95% CI 0.28 to 30.42). Furthermore, comparison of area under the ROC curve for SI (0.68) and ROPE (0.54) suggested that SI was more predictive than ROPE of blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: We found that an elevated SI was more closely associated with early blood product transfusion than SBP and ROPE in injured pregnant patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level III BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5887580/ /pubmed/29766106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000112 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Jenkins, Peter C Stokes, Samantha M Fakoyeho, Stephen Bell, Teresa M Zarzaur, Ben L Clinical indicators of hemorrhagic shock in pregnancy |
title | Clinical indicators of hemorrhagic shock in pregnancy |
title_full | Clinical indicators of hemorrhagic shock in pregnancy |
title_fullStr | Clinical indicators of hemorrhagic shock in pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical indicators of hemorrhagic shock in pregnancy |
title_short | Clinical indicators of hemorrhagic shock in pregnancy |
title_sort | clinical indicators of hemorrhagic shock in pregnancy |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jenkinspeterc clinicalindicatorsofhemorrhagicshockinpregnancy AT stokessamantham clinicalindicatorsofhemorrhagicshockinpregnancy AT fakoyehostephen clinicalindicatorsofhemorrhagicshockinpregnancy AT bellteresam clinicalindicatorsofhemorrhagicshockinpregnancy AT zarzaurbenl clinicalindicatorsofhemorrhagicshockinpregnancy |