Cargando…

Derivation and validation of a two-biomarker panel for diagnosis of ARDS in patients with severe traumatic injuries

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is common after severe traumatic injuries but is underdiagnosed and undertreated. We hypothesized that a panel of plasma biomarkers could be used to diagnose ARDS in severe trauma. To test this hypothesis, we derived and validated a biomarker pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ware, Lorraine B, Zhao, Zhiguo, Koyama, Tatsuki, Brown, Ryan M, Semler, Matthew W, Janz, David R, May, Addison K, Fremont, Richard D, Matthay, Michael A, Cohen, Mitchell J, Calfee, Carolyn S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000121
_version_ 1783312336690348032
author Ware, Lorraine B
Zhao, Zhiguo
Koyama, Tatsuki
Brown, Ryan M
Semler, Matthew W
Janz, David R
May, Addison K
Fremont, Richard D
Matthay, Michael A
Cohen, Mitchell J
Calfee, Carolyn S
author_facet Ware, Lorraine B
Zhao, Zhiguo
Koyama, Tatsuki
Brown, Ryan M
Semler, Matthew W
Janz, David R
May, Addison K
Fremont, Richard D
Matthay, Michael A
Cohen, Mitchell J
Calfee, Carolyn S
author_sort Ware, Lorraine B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is common after severe traumatic injuries but is underdiagnosed and undertreated. We hypothesized that a panel of plasma biomarkers could be used to diagnose ARDS in severe trauma. To test this hypothesis, we derived and validated a biomarker panel in three independent cohorts and compared the diagnostic performance to clinician recognition of ARDS. METHODS: Eleven plasma biomarkers of inflammation, lung epithelial and endothelial injury were measured in a derivation cohort of 439 severe trauma patients. ARDS status was analyzed by two-investigator consensus, and cases were required to meet Berlin criteria on intensive care unit (ICU) day 1. Controls were subjects without ARDS during the first 4 days of study enrollment. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to generate probabilities for ARDS. A reduced model with the top two performing markers was then tested in two independent validation cohorts. To assess clinical diagnosis of ARDS, medical records in the derivation cohort were systematically searched for documentation of ARDS diagnosis made by a clinical provider. RESULTS: Among 11 biomarkers, the combination of the endothelial injury marker angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and the lung epithelial injury marker receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) provided good discrimination for ARDS in the derivation cohort (area under the curve (AUC)=0.74 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80). In the validation cohorts, the AUCs for this model were 0.70 (0.61 to 0.77) and 0.78 (0.71 to 0.84). In contrast, provider assessment demonstrated poor diagnostic accuracy for ARDS, with AUC of 0.55 (0.51 to 0.60). DISCUSSION: A two-biomarker panel consisting of Ang-2 and RAGE performed well across multiple patient cohorts and outperformed clinical providers for diagnosing ARDS in severe trauma. Clinical application of this model could improve both diagnosis and treatment of ARDS in patients with severe trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5887582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58875822018-05-14 Derivation and validation of a two-biomarker panel for diagnosis of ARDS in patients with severe traumatic injuries Ware, Lorraine B Zhao, Zhiguo Koyama, Tatsuki Brown, Ryan M Semler, Matthew W Janz, David R May, Addison K Fremont, Richard D Matthay, Michael A Cohen, Mitchell J Calfee, Carolyn S Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is common after severe traumatic injuries but is underdiagnosed and undertreated. We hypothesized that a panel of plasma biomarkers could be used to diagnose ARDS in severe trauma. To test this hypothesis, we derived and validated a biomarker panel in three independent cohorts and compared the diagnostic performance to clinician recognition of ARDS. METHODS: Eleven plasma biomarkers of inflammation, lung epithelial and endothelial injury were measured in a derivation cohort of 439 severe trauma patients. ARDS status was analyzed by two-investigator consensus, and cases were required to meet Berlin criteria on intensive care unit (ICU) day 1. Controls were subjects without ARDS during the first 4 days of study enrollment. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to generate probabilities for ARDS. A reduced model with the top two performing markers was then tested in two independent validation cohorts. To assess clinical diagnosis of ARDS, medical records in the derivation cohort were systematically searched for documentation of ARDS diagnosis made by a clinical provider. RESULTS: Among 11 biomarkers, the combination of the endothelial injury marker angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and the lung epithelial injury marker receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) provided good discrimination for ARDS in the derivation cohort (area under the curve (AUC)=0.74 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80). In the validation cohorts, the AUCs for this model were 0.70 (0.61 to 0.77) and 0.78 (0.71 to 0.84). In contrast, provider assessment demonstrated poor diagnostic accuracy for ARDS, with AUC of 0.55 (0.51 to 0.60). DISCUSSION: A two-biomarker panel consisting of Ang-2 and RAGE performed well across multiple patient cohorts and outperformed clinical providers for diagnosing ARDS in severe trauma. Clinical application of this model could improve both diagnosis and treatment of ARDS in patients with severe trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5887582/ /pubmed/29766112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000121 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Ware, Lorraine B
Zhao, Zhiguo
Koyama, Tatsuki
Brown, Ryan M
Semler, Matthew W
Janz, David R
May, Addison K
Fremont, Richard D
Matthay, Michael A
Cohen, Mitchell J
Calfee, Carolyn S
Derivation and validation of a two-biomarker panel for diagnosis of ARDS in patients with severe traumatic injuries
title Derivation and validation of a two-biomarker panel for diagnosis of ARDS in patients with severe traumatic injuries
title_full Derivation and validation of a two-biomarker panel for diagnosis of ARDS in patients with severe traumatic injuries
title_fullStr Derivation and validation of a two-biomarker panel for diagnosis of ARDS in patients with severe traumatic injuries
title_full_unstemmed Derivation and validation of a two-biomarker panel for diagnosis of ARDS in patients with severe traumatic injuries
title_short Derivation and validation of a two-biomarker panel for diagnosis of ARDS in patients with severe traumatic injuries
title_sort derivation and validation of a two-biomarker panel for diagnosis of ards in patients with severe traumatic injuries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000121
work_keys_str_mv AT warelorraineb derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries
AT zhaozhiguo derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries
AT koyamatatsuki derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries
AT brownryanm derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries
AT semlermattheww derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries
AT janzdavidr derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries
AT mayaddisonk derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries
AT fremontrichardd derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries
AT matthaymichaela derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries
AT cohenmitchellj derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries
AT calfeecarolyns derivationandvalidationofatwobiomarkerpanelfordiagnosisofardsinpatientswithseveretraumaticinjuries