Cargando…

T49. THE NEURAPRO STUDY: ADHERENCE TO STUDY MEDICATION

BACKGROUND: Adherence to a medication is generally defined as the extent to which patients take medications as prescribed by their health care providers. Poor adherence to study medication is not uncommon posing a major challenge to treatment trails. However, poor adherence may not be randomly distr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlögelhofer, Monika, McGorry, Patrick D, Nelson, Barnaby, Markulev, Connie, Yuen, Hok Pan, Schäfer, Miriam, Mossaheb, Nilufar, Smesny, Stefan, Hickie, Ian B, Berger, Gregor, Chen, Eric Y H, de Haan, Lieuwe, Nieman, Dorien H, Nordentoft, Merete, Riecher-Rössler, Anita, Verma, Swapna, Thompson, Andrew, Yung, Alison Ruth, Paul Amminger, G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5888024/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby016.325
_version_ 1783312438661218304
author Schlögelhofer, Monika
McGorry, Patrick D
Nelson, Barnaby
Markulev, Connie
Yuen, Hok Pan
Schäfer, Miriam
Mossaheb, Nilufar
Smesny, Stefan
Hickie, Ian B
Berger, Gregor
Chen, Eric Y H
de Haan, Lieuwe
Nieman, Dorien H
Nordentoft, Merete
Riecher-Rössler, Anita
Verma, Swapna
Thompson, Andrew
Yung, Alison Ruth
Paul Amminger, G
author_facet Schlögelhofer, Monika
McGorry, Patrick D
Nelson, Barnaby
Markulev, Connie
Yuen, Hok Pan
Schäfer, Miriam
Mossaheb, Nilufar
Smesny, Stefan
Hickie, Ian B
Berger, Gregor
Chen, Eric Y H
de Haan, Lieuwe
Nieman, Dorien H
Nordentoft, Merete
Riecher-Rössler, Anita
Verma, Swapna
Thompson, Andrew
Yung, Alison Ruth
Paul Amminger, G
author_sort Schlögelhofer, Monika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adherence to a medication is generally defined as the extent to which patients take medications as prescribed by their health care providers. Poor adherence to study medication is not uncommon posing a major challenge to treatment trails. However, poor adherence may not be randomly distributed but rather be associated with demographic or illness factors. The aim of the present study was to identify factors associated with adherence to study medication in young people at ultrahigh risk of psychosis who participated in the NEURAPRO study. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data collected in a multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial to prevent or delay the onset of psychosis in participants at ultrahigh risk of psychosis testing omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3 PUFAs) vs. placebo, in combination with cognitive behavioural case management (NEURAPRO) were included in this analysis. Measures included the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), and the Global Functioning: Social and Role scales. Adherence to the study medication was assessed monthly for each participant based on capsule count. The mean adherence rating over the 6-month intervention period was then computed and categorized as either adherent (≤25% of capsules returned) or non-adherent (>25% of capsules returned). Transition to psychosis was defined on the basis of operationalized criteria and assessed with the Comprehensive Assessment of the At-Risk Mental State. Levels of ω-3 PUFAs in fish oil, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (amongst other fatty acids) were measured as percentage of total fatty acids in erythrocytes at baseline and at month 6 (end-of-intervention). RESULTS: Of 304 randomised participants, 57.9% (N = 176) were non-adherent (>25% of capsules returned) and 128 (42.1%) were adherent (≤25% capsules returned) to the study medication. No sex differences were observed for adherence rates. At baseline the omega-3 index (EPA+DHA) was significantly lower in the non-adherent group (P = 0.018). The non-adherent group had significant lower scores on the SOFAS (P = 0.001) and the Global Functioning: Social and Role Scale at baseline assessment (P < 0.001 and P = 0.020, respectively) compared to the adherent group. No statistically significant differences were observed on symptom measures at baseline (BPRS, SANS, MADRS, YMRS). The cumulative transition to psychosis rate at month 12 was significantly higher in the non-adherent group compared to the adherent group (14.8% vs. 4.7%; Log rank test: P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Adherence to study medication was relatively low in NEURAPRO. Poor functioning and lower levels of ω-3 PUFAs at baseline were associated with non-adherence. Young people who were non-adherent had a significantly higher risk of progressing to first episode psychosis. Knowledge about factors associated with adherence could help to improve the delivery of interventions in young people at risk of psychosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5888024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58880242018-04-11 T49. THE NEURAPRO STUDY: ADHERENCE TO STUDY MEDICATION Schlögelhofer, Monika McGorry, Patrick D Nelson, Barnaby Markulev, Connie Yuen, Hok Pan Schäfer, Miriam Mossaheb, Nilufar Smesny, Stefan Hickie, Ian B Berger, Gregor Chen, Eric Y H de Haan, Lieuwe Nieman, Dorien H Nordentoft, Merete Riecher-Rössler, Anita Verma, Swapna Thompson, Andrew Yung, Alison Ruth Paul Amminger, G Schizophr Bull Abstracts BACKGROUND: Adherence to a medication is generally defined as the extent to which patients take medications as prescribed by their health care providers. Poor adherence to study medication is not uncommon posing a major challenge to treatment trails. However, poor adherence may not be randomly distributed but rather be associated with demographic or illness factors. The aim of the present study was to identify factors associated with adherence to study medication in young people at ultrahigh risk of psychosis who participated in the NEURAPRO study. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data collected in a multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial to prevent or delay the onset of psychosis in participants at ultrahigh risk of psychosis testing omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3 PUFAs) vs. placebo, in combination with cognitive behavioural case management (NEURAPRO) were included in this analysis. Measures included the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), and the Global Functioning: Social and Role scales. Adherence to the study medication was assessed monthly for each participant based on capsule count. The mean adherence rating over the 6-month intervention period was then computed and categorized as either adherent (≤25% of capsules returned) or non-adherent (>25% of capsules returned). Transition to psychosis was defined on the basis of operationalized criteria and assessed with the Comprehensive Assessment of the At-Risk Mental State. Levels of ω-3 PUFAs in fish oil, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (amongst other fatty acids) were measured as percentage of total fatty acids in erythrocytes at baseline and at month 6 (end-of-intervention). RESULTS: Of 304 randomised participants, 57.9% (N = 176) were non-adherent (>25% of capsules returned) and 128 (42.1%) were adherent (≤25% capsules returned) to the study medication. No sex differences were observed for adherence rates. At baseline the omega-3 index (EPA+DHA) was significantly lower in the non-adherent group (P = 0.018). The non-adherent group had significant lower scores on the SOFAS (P = 0.001) and the Global Functioning: Social and Role Scale at baseline assessment (P < 0.001 and P = 0.020, respectively) compared to the adherent group. No statistically significant differences were observed on symptom measures at baseline (BPRS, SANS, MADRS, YMRS). The cumulative transition to psychosis rate at month 12 was significantly higher in the non-adherent group compared to the adherent group (14.8% vs. 4.7%; Log rank test: P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Adherence to study medication was relatively low in NEURAPRO. Poor functioning and lower levels of ω-3 PUFAs at baseline were associated with non-adherence. Young people who were non-adherent had a significantly higher risk of progressing to first episode psychosis. Knowledge about factors associated with adherence could help to improve the delivery of interventions in young people at risk of psychosis. Oxford University Press 2018-04 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5888024/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby016.325 Text en © Maryland Psychiatric Research Center 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Schlögelhofer, Monika
McGorry, Patrick D
Nelson, Barnaby
Markulev, Connie
Yuen, Hok Pan
Schäfer, Miriam
Mossaheb, Nilufar
Smesny, Stefan
Hickie, Ian B
Berger, Gregor
Chen, Eric Y H
de Haan, Lieuwe
Nieman, Dorien H
Nordentoft, Merete
Riecher-Rössler, Anita
Verma, Swapna
Thompson, Andrew
Yung, Alison Ruth
Paul Amminger, G
T49. THE NEURAPRO STUDY: ADHERENCE TO STUDY MEDICATION
title T49. THE NEURAPRO STUDY: ADHERENCE TO STUDY MEDICATION
title_full T49. THE NEURAPRO STUDY: ADHERENCE TO STUDY MEDICATION
title_fullStr T49. THE NEURAPRO STUDY: ADHERENCE TO STUDY MEDICATION
title_full_unstemmed T49. THE NEURAPRO STUDY: ADHERENCE TO STUDY MEDICATION
title_short T49. THE NEURAPRO STUDY: ADHERENCE TO STUDY MEDICATION
title_sort t49. the neurapro study: adherence to study medication
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5888024/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby016.325
work_keys_str_mv AT schlogelhofermonika t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT mcgorrypatrickd t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT nelsonbarnaby t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT markulevconnie t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT yuenhokpan t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT schafermiriam t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT mossahebnilufar t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT smesnystefan t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT hickieianb t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT bergergregor t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT chenericyh t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT dehaanlieuwe t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT niemandorienh t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT nordentoftmerete t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT riecherrossleranita t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT vermaswapna t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT thompsonandrew t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT yungalisonruth t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication
AT paulammingerg t49theneuraprostudyadherencetostudymedication