Cargando…

S113. THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SCHIZOTYPAL COMPONENTS AND CONSPIRACIST BELIEFS THROUGH COGNITIVE MEDIATORS

BACKGROUND: Belief in conspiracy theories (i.e., a subset of false narratives in which the ultimate cause of an event is believed to be due to a malevolent plot by multiple actors working together) is a widespread and stable aspect of contemporary public opinion. Given such findings, researchers hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barron, David, Furnham, Adrian, Weis, Laura, Morgan, Kevin, Towell, Tony, Swami, Viren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5888032/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby018.900
_version_ 1783312440578015232
author Barron, David
Furnham, Adrian
Weis, Laura
Morgan, Kevin
Towell, Tony
Swami, Viren
author_facet Barron, David
Furnham, Adrian
Weis, Laura
Morgan, Kevin
Towell, Tony
Swami, Viren
author_sort Barron, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Belief in conspiracy theories (i.e., a subset of false narratives in which the ultimate cause of an event is believed to be due to a malevolent plot by multiple actors working together) is a widespread and stable aspect of contemporary public opinion. Given such findings, researchers have sought to understand the factors that make someone more or less likely to adopt conspiracist beliefs. More specifically, scholars have focused primarily on social and differential aspects, as well as possible psychopathological elements. These endeavours have led to reports of significant associations between schizotypal facets (odd or magical thinking and, to a lesser extent, ideas of references) and the endorsement of conspiracist beliefs. However, one limitation of extant findings is the assumption that the afore-mentioned relationships are ultimately direct; that is, schizotypal facets are directly associated with conspiracist beliefs, rather than influenced by mediating processes. To overcome this limitation, the present study sought to replicate previous findings by confirming the relationships between components of schizotypy and conspiracist beliefs. Second, this study examined the mediating influence of cognitive processes on this relationship. METHODS: An international online sample of 411 women and men completed measures of schizotypal components (i.e., odd beliefs or magical thinking and ideas of reference), conspiracist beliefs, and cognitive processes (i.e., need for cognition, analytic thinking, and cognitive insight). RESULTS: Through path analysis, results indicated associations between both schizotypal facets and conspiracist beliefs in the present sample. Further, there was evidence for the association between analytic thinking and conspiracist beliefs, and between cognitive insight and conspiracist beliefs. Indeed, cognitive insight was found to mediate the association between odd beliefs or magical thinking and ideas of reference with conspiracist beliefs. In addition, analytic thinking provided a mediating link to conspiracy ideation for odd beliefs or magical thinking, this was not found with ideas of reference. Despite an association between odd beliefs or magical thinking and need for cognition, this did not extend to conspiracist beliefs. DISCUSSION: In summary, the results of this study supported the association between schizotypal components and conspiracist beliefs. However, they also extend previous research by suggesting that cognitive processes mediate this link. That is, although a direct link between these variables may be tenable, it is also important to consider the possible ways in which schizotypy influences cognitive processes, which in turn have an effect on conspiracist beliefs. From a practical point-of-view, this highlights possible intervention routes for reducing conspiracist beliefs, either by targeting schizotypal traits indirectly or cognitive factors directly. While this research addresses schizotypy, patients with psychotic disorders and those with an at-risk mental state have also been shown to have reasoning biases. Therefore, future research, in relation to the clinical spectrum, should consider not only reasoning biases, but an outcome of conspiracy beliefs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5888032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58880322018-04-11 S113. THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SCHIZOTYPAL COMPONENTS AND CONSPIRACIST BELIEFS THROUGH COGNITIVE MEDIATORS Barron, David Furnham, Adrian Weis, Laura Morgan, Kevin Towell, Tony Swami, Viren Schizophr Bull Abstracts BACKGROUND: Belief in conspiracy theories (i.e., a subset of false narratives in which the ultimate cause of an event is believed to be due to a malevolent plot by multiple actors working together) is a widespread and stable aspect of contemporary public opinion. Given such findings, researchers have sought to understand the factors that make someone more or less likely to adopt conspiracist beliefs. More specifically, scholars have focused primarily on social and differential aspects, as well as possible psychopathological elements. These endeavours have led to reports of significant associations between schizotypal facets (odd or magical thinking and, to a lesser extent, ideas of references) and the endorsement of conspiracist beliefs. However, one limitation of extant findings is the assumption that the afore-mentioned relationships are ultimately direct; that is, schizotypal facets are directly associated with conspiracist beliefs, rather than influenced by mediating processes. To overcome this limitation, the present study sought to replicate previous findings by confirming the relationships between components of schizotypy and conspiracist beliefs. Second, this study examined the mediating influence of cognitive processes on this relationship. METHODS: An international online sample of 411 women and men completed measures of schizotypal components (i.e., odd beliefs or magical thinking and ideas of reference), conspiracist beliefs, and cognitive processes (i.e., need for cognition, analytic thinking, and cognitive insight). RESULTS: Through path analysis, results indicated associations between both schizotypal facets and conspiracist beliefs in the present sample. Further, there was evidence for the association between analytic thinking and conspiracist beliefs, and between cognitive insight and conspiracist beliefs. Indeed, cognitive insight was found to mediate the association between odd beliefs or magical thinking and ideas of reference with conspiracist beliefs. In addition, analytic thinking provided a mediating link to conspiracy ideation for odd beliefs or magical thinking, this was not found with ideas of reference. Despite an association between odd beliefs or magical thinking and need for cognition, this did not extend to conspiracist beliefs. DISCUSSION: In summary, the results of this study supported the association between schizotypal components and conspiracist beliefs. However, they also extend previous research by suggesting that cognitive processes mediate this link. That is, although a direct link between these variables may be tenable, it is also important to consider the possible ways in which schizotypy influences cognitive processes, which in turn have an effect on conspiracist beliefs. From a practical point-of-view, this highlights possible intervention routes for reducing conspiracist beliefs, either by targeting schizotypal traits indirectly or cognitive factors directly. While this research addresses schizotypy, patients with psychotic disorders and those with an at-risk mental state have also been shown to have reasoning biases. Therefore, future research, in relation to the clinical spectrum, should consider not only reasoning biases, but an outcome of conspiracy beliefs. Oxford University Press 2018-04 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5888032/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby018.900 Text en © Maryland Psychiatric Research Center 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Barron, David
Furnham, Adrian
Weis, Laura
Morgan, Kevin
Towell, Tony
Swami, Viren
S113. THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SCHIZOTYPAL COMPONENTS AND CONSPIRACIST BELIEFS THROUGH COGNITIVE MEDIATORS
title S113. THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SCHIZOTYPAL COMPONENTS AND CONSPIRACIST BELIEFS THROUGH COGNITIVE MEDIATORS
title_full S113. THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SCHIZOTYPAL COMPONENTS AND CONSPIRACIST BELIEFS THROUGH COGNITIVE MEDIATORS
title_fullStr S113. THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SCHIZOTYPAL COMPONENTS AND CONSPIRACIST BELIEFS THROUGH COGNITIVE MEDIATORS
title_full_unstemmed S113. THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SCHIZOTYPAL COMPONENTS AND CONSPIRACIST BELIEFS THROUGH COGNITIVE MEDIATORS
title_short S113. THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SCHIZOTYPAL COMPONENTS AND CONSPIRACIST BELIEFS THROUGH COGNITIVE MEDIATORS
title_sort s113. the association between schizotypal components and conspiracist beliefs through cognitive mediators
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5888032/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby018.900
work_keys_str_mv AT barrondavid s113theassociationbetweenschizotypalcomponentsandconspiracistbeliefsthroughcognitivemediators
AT furnhamadrian s113theassociationbetweenschizotypalcomponentsandconspiracistbeliefsthroughcognitivemediators
AT weislaura s113theassociationbetweenschizotypalcomponentsandconspiracistbeliefsthroughcognitivemediators
AT morgankevin s113theassociationbetweenschizotypalcomponentsandconspiracistbeliefsthroughcognitivemediators
AT towelltony s113theassociationbetweenschizotypalcomponentsandconspiracistbeliefsthroughcognitivemediators
AT swamiviren s113theassociationbetweenschizotypalcomponentsandconspiracistbeliefsthroughcognitivemediators