Cargando…
Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)
Data for individual trials included in systematic reviews may be available in multiple sources. For example, a single trial might be reported in 2 journal articles and 3 conference abstracts. Because of differences across sources, source selection can influence the results of systematic reviews. We...
Autores principales: | Mayo‐Wilson, Evan, Li, Tianjing, Fusco, Nicole, Dickersin, Kay |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5888128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29057573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1277 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting
por: Li, Tianjing, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Establishing Best Practices and Guidance in Population Modeling: An Experience With an Internal Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis Guidance
por: Byon, W, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Correction to: Integrating multiple data sources (MUDS) for meta-analysis to improve patient-centered outcomes research: a protocol
por: Mayo-Wilson, Evan, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Integrating multiple data sources (MUDS) for meta-analysis to improve patient-centered outcomes research: a protocol for a systematic review
por: Mayo-Wilson, Evan, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses
por: Polanin, Joshua R., et al.
Publicado: (2019)