Cargando…

S46. THE VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY OF PANSS-6 IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA

BACKGROUND: A six-item version (PANSS-6: P1=Delusions, P2=Conceptual disorganization, P3=Hallucinations, N1=Blunted Affect, N4=Social withdrawal, N6=Lack of spontaneity/flow of conversation) of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) has shown promise in the measurement of sympto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ostergaard, Soren Dinesen, Foldager, Leslie, Mors, Ole, Bech, Per, Correll, Christoph U
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5888357/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby018.833
_version_ 1783312504998330368
author Ostergaard, Soren Dinesen
Foldager, Leslie
Mors, Ole
Bech, Per
Correll, Christoph U
author_facet Ostergaard, Soren Dinesen
Foldager, Leslie
Mors, Ole
Bech, Per
Correll, Christoph U
author_sort Ostergaard, Soren Dinesen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A six-item version (PANSS-6: P1=Delusions, P2=Conceptual disorganization, P3=Hallucinations, N1=Blunted Affect, N4=Social withdrawal, N6=Lack of spontaneity/flow of conversation) of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) has shown promise in the measurement of symptom severity in acutely exacerbated- and chronic schizophrenia, but its validity in treatment-resistant schizophrenia remains unknown. Therefore, we tested the validity and sensitivity of PANSS-6 based on data from the clozapine phase of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study. METHODS: I) The scalability of PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 (i.e., whether all items provide unique information regarding syndrome severity) was tested by means of item response theory analysis ad modum Rasch; II) The correlation between PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 total scores was investigated by means of Spearman correlation analysis; III) The accuracy of PANSS-6 in identifying symptom remission was tested by comparing remission on PANSS-6 (score of ≤3 on each of the six PANSS-6 items) with remission according to the Andreasen criteria (score of ≤3 on the 8 PANSS items considered in the Andreasen criteria); and IV) The antipsychotic effect of clozapine was compared to that of olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine using the “speed of change” on PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 (change in total score per day) as outcomes. RESULTS: We found that I) only PANSS-6 and not PANSS-30 was scalable; II) The correlation between PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 total scores was high (Spearman coefficient: 0.85), III) PANSS-6 did accurately classify syndrome remission as defined by the Andreasen criteria, and IV) The only antipsychotic that resulted in improvement (speed of change significantly lower than 0 during the first three months of treatment) was clozapine, both when using PANSS-6 (speed of change: -0.072 points/day; 95%CI: -0.121, -0.024) and when using PANSS-30 (speed of change: -0.201 points/day; 95%CI: -0.400, -0.002) as outcome measures. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that PANSS-6 validly measures severity, remission and antipsychotic efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5888357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58883572018-04-11 S46. THE VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY OF PANSS-6 IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA Ostergaard, Soren Dinesen Foldager, Leslie Mors, Ole Bech, Per Correll, Christoph U Schizophr Bull Abstracts BACKGROUND: A six-item version (PANSS-6: P1=Delusions, P2=Conceptual disorganization, P3=Hallucinations, N1=Blunted Affect, N4=Social withdrawal, N6=Lack of spontaneity/flow of conversation) of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) has shown promise in the measurement of symptom severity in acutely exacerbated- and chronic schizophrenia, but its validity in treatment-resistant schizophrenia remains unknown. Therefore, we tested the validity and sensitivity of PANSS-6 based on data from the clozapine phase of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study. METHODS: I) The scalability of PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 (i.e., whether all items provide unique information regarding syndrome severity) was tested by means of item response theory analysis ad modum Rasch; II) The correlation between PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 total scores was investigated by means of Spearman correlation analysis; III) The accuracy of PANSS-6 in identifying symptom remission was tested by comparing remission on PANSS-6 (score of ≤3 on each of the six PANSS-6 items) with remission according to the Andreasen criteria (score of ≤3 on the 8 PANSS items considered in the Andreasen criteria); and IV) The antipsychotic effect of clozapine was compared to that of olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine using the “speed of change” on PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 (change in total score per day) as outcomes. RESULTS: We found that I) only PANSS-6 and not PANSS-30 was scalable; II) The correlation between PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 total scores was high (Spearman coefficient: 0.85), III) PANSS-6 did accurately classify syndrome remission as defined by the Andreasen criteria, and IV) The only antipsychotic that resulted in improvement (speed of change significantly lower than 0 during the first three months of treatment) was clozapine, both when using PANSS-6 (speed of change: -0.072 points/day; 95%CI: -0.121, -0.024) and when using PANSS-30 (speed of change: -0.201 points/day; 95%CI: -0.400, -0.002) as outcome measures. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that PANSS-6 validly measures severity, remission and antipsychotic efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Oxford University Press 2018-04 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5888357/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby018.833 Text en © Maryland Psychiatric Research Center 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ostergaard, Soren Dinesen
Foldager, Leslie
Mors, Ole
Bech, Per
Correll, Christoph U
S46. THE VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY OF PANSS-6 IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA
title S46. THE VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY OF PANSS-6 IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA
title_full S46. THE VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY OF PANSS-6 IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA
title_fullStr S46. THE VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY OF PANSS-6 IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA
title_full_unstemmed S46. THE VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY OF PANSS-6 IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA
title_short S46. THE VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY OF PANSS-6 IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA
title_sort s46. the validity and sensitivity of panss-6 in treatment-resistant schizophrenia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5888357/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby018.833
work_keys_str_mv AT ostergaardsorendinesen s46thevalidityandsensitivityofpanss6intreatmentresistantschizophrenia
AT foldagerleslie s46thevalidityandsensitivityofpanss6intreatmentresistantschizophrenia
AT morsole s46thevalidityandsensitivityofpanss6intreatmentresistantschizophrenia
AT bechper s46thevalidityandsensitivityofpanss6intreatmentresistantschizophrenia
AT correllchristophu s46thevalidityandsensitivityofpanss6intreatmentresistantschizophrenia