Cargando…

41.1 WHAT DO META-ANALYSES TELL US ABOUT CLOZAPINE’S EFFICACY AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR TREATMENT REFRACTORY SCHIZOPHRENIA?

BACKGROUND: Clozapine has long been considered the gold standard antipsychotic for treatment refractory schizophrenia (TRS). There have been a number of recent meta-analyses of efficacy of clozapine on psychotic symptoms and effectiveness in reducing hospitalisations that have sparked debate on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siskind, Dan, Kisely, Steve, Land, Rachel, McCartney, Lara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5888558/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby014.169
_version_ 1783312550465634304
author Siskind, Dan
Kisely, Steve
Land, Rachel
McCartney, Lara
author_facet Siskind, Dan
Kisely, Steve
Land, Rachel
McCartney, Lara
author_sort Siskind, Dan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clozapine has long been considered the gold standard antipsychotic for treatment refractory schizophrenia (TRS). There have been a number of recent meta-analyses of efficacy of clozapine on psychotic symptoms and effectiveness in reducing hospitalisations that have sparked debate on the role of clozapine. METHODS: Current literature regarding the efficacy of clozapine for TRS, including pair-wise and network meta-analyses of RCTs with reported outcomes of total psychotic symptoms, positive symptoms and negative symptoms were reviewed. We also examined the results of a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of clozapine on reducing hospitalisations based in RCTs and observational studies. RESULTS: Two recent meta-analyses: Samara et al (2016), a network meta-analysis in JAMA Psychiatry; and Siskind et al (2016) a pairwise meta-analysis in BJPsych, found similar equivocal results for total psychotic symptoms. However, Siskind et al (2016) found clozapine to be superior to other anti-psychotics for positive symptoms. Factors influencing the difference in results included pair-wise vs network methodology and sensitivity analyses of pharmaceutical industry support. Of note, only 40% of people with TRS responded to clozapine. Clozapine’s effectiveness for reducing hospitalisations was significant, with a relative risk of 0.74 (95%CI 0.69–0.80). DISCUSSION: There are a lack of recent non-industry funded randomised control trials of clozapine compared to SGAs, which hinders an equivocal statement about the superiority of clozapine for total psychotic symptoms. However, there is evidence to suggest that clozapine is superior to other antipsychotics, including SGAs, for positive symptoms. In terms of effectiveness, initiation of clozapine can reduce the proportion of people hospitalised and reduce bed days. Use of clozapine needs to be balanced against its adverse drug reaction profile. There remains a need for more effective treatments for TRS, and biomarkers to identify TRS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5888558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58885582018-04-11 41.1 WHAT DO META-ANALYSES TELL US ABOUT CLOZAPINE’S EFFICACY AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR TREATMENT REFRACTORY SCHIZOPHRENIA? Siskind, Dan Kisely, Steve Land, Rachel McCartney, Lara Schizophr Bull Abstracts BACKGROUND: Clozapine has long been considered the gold standard antipsychotic for treatment refractory schizophrenia (TRS). There have been a number of recent meta-analyses of efficacy of clozapine on psychotic symptoms and effectiveness in reducing hospitalisations that have sparked debate on the role of clozapine. METHODS: Current literature regarding the efficacy of clozapine for TRS, including pair-wise and network meta-analyses of RCTs with reported outcomes of total psychotic symptoms, positive symptoms and negative symptoms were reviewed. We also examined the results of a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of clozapine on reducing hospitalisations based in RCTs and observational studies. RESULTS: Two recent meta-analyses: Samara et al (2016), a network meta-analysis in JAMA Psychiatry; and Siskind et al (2016) a pairwise meta-analysis in BJPsych, found similar equivocal results for total psychotic symptoms. However, Siskind et al (2016) found clozapine to be superior to other anti-psychotics for positive symptoms. Factors influencing the difference in results included pair-wise vs network methodology and sensitivity analyses of pharmaceutical industry support. Of note, only 40% of people with TRS responded to clozapine. Clozapine’s effectiveness for reducing hospitalisations was significant, with a relative risk of 0.74 (95%CI 0.69–0.80). DISCUSSION: There are a lack of recent non-industry funded randomised control trials of clozapine compared to SGAs, which hinders an equivocal statement about the superiority of clozapine for total psychotic symptoms. However, there is evidence to suggest that clozapine is superior to other antipsychotics, including SGAs, for positive symptoms. In terms of effectiveness, initiation of clozapine can reduce the proportion of people hospitalised and reduce bed days. Use of clozapine needs to be balanced against its adverse drug reaction profile. There remains a need for more effective treatments for TRS, and biomarkers to identify TRS. Oxford University Press 2018-04 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5888558/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby014.169 Text en © Maryland Psychiatric Research Center 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Siskind, Dan
Kisely, Steve
Land, Rachel
McCartney, Lara
41.1 WHAT DO META-ANALYSES TELL US ABOUT CLOZAPINE’S EFFICACY AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR TREATMENT REFRACTORY SCHIZOPHRENIA?
title 41.1 WHAT DO META-ANALYSES TELL US ABOUT CLOZAPINE’S EFFICACY AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR TREATMENT REFRACTORY SCHIZOPHRENIA?
title_full 41.1 WHAT DO META-ANALYSES TELL US ABOUT CLOZAPINE’S EFFICACY AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR TREATMENT REFRACTORY SCHIZOPHRENIA?
title_fullStr 41.1 WHAT DO META-ANALYSES TELL US ABOUT CLOZAPINE’S EFFICACY AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR TREATMENT REFRACTORY SCHIZOPHRENIA?
title_full_unstemmed 41.1 WHAT DO META-ANALYSES TELL US ABOUT CLOZAPINE’S EFFICACY AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR TREATMENT REFRACTORY SCHIZOPHRENIA?
title_short 41.1 WHAT DO META-ANALYSES TELL US ABOUT CLOZAPINE’S EFFICACY AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR TREATMENT REFRACTORY SCHIZOPHRENIA?
title_sort 41.1 what do meta-analyses tell us about clozapine’s efficacy and effectiveness for treatment refractory schizophrenia?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5888558/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby014.169
work_keys_str_mv AT siskinddan 411whatdometaanalysestellusaboutclozapinesefficacyandeffectivenessfortreatmentrefractoryschizophrenia
AT kiselysteve 411whatdometaanalysestellusaboutclozapinesefficacyandeffectivenessfortreatmentrefractoryschizophrenia
AT landrachel 411whatdometaanalysestellusaboutclozapinesefficacyandeffectivenessfortreatmentrefractoryschizophrenia
AT mccartneylara 411whatdometaanalysestellusaboutclozapinesefficacyandeffectivenessfortreatmentrefractoryschizophrenia