Cargando…

Effect of a Facial Muscle Exercise Device on Facial Rejuvenation

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of facial muscle exercises (FMEs) for facial rejuvenation is controversial. In the majority of previous studies, nonquantitative assessment tools were used to assess the benefits of FMEs. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effectiveness of FMEs using a Pao (MTG, Nagoya, Jap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Ui-jae, Kwon, Oh-yun, Jung, Sung-hoon, Ahn, Sun-hee, Gwak, Gyeong-tae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5888959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29365050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx238
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The efficacy of facial muscle exercises (FMEs) for facial rejuvenation is controversial. In the majority of previous studies, nonquantitative assessment tools were used to assess the benefits of FMEs. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effectiveness of FMEs using a Pao (MTG, Nagoya, Japan) device to quantify facial rejuvenation. METHODS: Fifty females were asked to perform FMEs using a Pao device for 30 seconds twice a day for 8 weeks. Facial muscle thickness and cross-sectional area were measured sonographically. Facial surface distance, surface area, and volumes were determined using a laser scanning system before and after FME. Facial muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, midfacial surface distances, jawline surface distance, and lower facial surface area and volume were compared bilaterally before and after FME using a paired Student t test. RESULTS: The cross-sectional areas of the zygomaticus major and digastric muscles increased significantly (right: P < 0.001, left: P = 0.015), while the midfacial surface distances in the middle (right: P = 0.005, left: P = 0.047) and lower (right: P = 0.028, left: P = 0.019) planes as well as the jawline surface distances (right: P = 0.004, left: P = 0.003) decreased significantly after FME using the Pao device. The lower facial surface areas (right: P = 0.005, left: P = 0.006) and volumes (right: P = 0.001, left: P = 0.002) were also significantly reduced after FME using the Pao device. CONCLUSIONS: FME using the Pao device can increase facial muscle thickness and cross-sectional area, thus contributing to facial rejuvenation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4: [Image: see text]