Cargando…

S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): a randomized, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with oral fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan has not yet been established as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We carried out a randomized, open-label, phase III trial to determine whether S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab is noninferior to m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamada, Y, Denda, T, Gamoh, M, Iwanaga, I, Yuki, S, Shimodaira, H, Nakamura, M, Yamaguchi, T, Ohori, H, Kobayashi, K, Tsuda, M, Kobayashi, Y, Miyamoto, Y, Kotake, M, Shimada, K, Sato, A, Morita, S, Takahashi, S, Komatsu, Y, Ishioka, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx816
_version_ 1783312641570111488
author Yamada, Y
Denda, T
Gamoh, M
Iwanaga, I
Yuki, S
Shimodaira, H
Nakamura, M
Yamaguchi, T
Ohori, H
Kobayashi, K
Tsuda, M
Kobayashi, Y
Miyamoto, Y
Kotake, M
Shimada, K
Sato, A
Morita, S
Takahashi, S
Komatsu, Y
Ishioka, C
author_facet Yamada, Y
Denda, T
Gamoh, M
Iwanaga, I
Yuki, S
Shimodaira, H
Nakamura, M
Yamaguchi, T
Ohori, H
Kobayashi, K
Tsuda, M
Kobayashi, Y
Miyamoto, Y
Kotake, M
Shimada, K
Sato, A
Morita, S
Takahashi, S
Komatsu, Y
Ishioka, C
author_sort Yamada, Y
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with oral fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan has not yet been established as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We carried out a randomized, open-label, phase III trial to determine whether S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab is noninferior to mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from 53 institutions who had previously untreated mCRC were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive either mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab (control group) or S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (experimental group; a 3-week regimen: intravenous infusions of irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1, oral S-1 80 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest; or a 4-week regimen: irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15, S-1 80 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest). The primary end point was PFS. The noninferiority margin was 1.25; noninferiority would be established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the hazard ratio (HR) of the control group versus the experimental group was less than this margin. RESULT: Between June 2012 and September 2014, 487 patients underwent randomization. Two hundred and forty-three patients assigned to the control group and 241 assigned to the experimental group were included in the primary analysis. Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI 9.6–11.6) in the control group and 14.0 months (95% CI 12.4–15.5) in the experimental group (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70–1.02; P < 0.0001 for noninferiority, P = 0.0815 for superiority). One hundred and fifty-seven patients (64.9%) in the control group and 140 (58.6%) in the experimental group had adverse events of grade 3 or higher. CONCLUSION: S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab is noninferior to mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab with respect to PFS as first-line treatment of mCRC and could be a new standard treatment. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: UMIN000007834
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5889030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58890302018-04-11 S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): a randomized, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial Yamada, Y Denda, T Gamoh, M Iwanaga, I Yuki, S Shimodaira, H Nakamura, M Yamaguchi, T Ohori, H Kobayashi, K Tsuda, M Kobayashi, Y Miyamoto, Y Kotake, M Shimada, K Sato, A Morita, S Takahashi, S Komatsu, Y Ishioka, C Ann Oncol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with oral fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan has not yet been established as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We carried out a randomized, open-label, phase III trial to determine whether S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab is noninferior to mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from 53 institutions who had previously untreated mCRC were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive either mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab (control group) or S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (experimental group; a 3-week regimen: intravenous infusions of irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1, oral S-1 80 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest; or a 4-week regimen: irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15, S-1 80 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest). The primary end point was PFS. The noninferiority margin was 1.25; noninferiority would be established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the hazard ratio (HR) of the control group versus the experimental group was less than this margin. RESULT: Between June 2012 and September 2014, 487 patients underwent randomization. Two hundred and forty-three patients assigned to the control group and 241 assigned to the experimental group were included in the primary analysis. Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI 9.6–11.6) in the control group and 14.0 months (95% CI 12.4–15.5) in the experimental group (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70–1.02; P < 0.0001 for noninferiority, P = 0.0815 for superiority). One hundred and fifty-seven patients (64.9%) in the control group and 140 (58.6%) in the experimental group had adverse events of grade 3 or higher. CONCLUSION: S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab is noninferior to mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab with respect to PFS as first-line treatment of mCRC and could be a new standard treatment. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: UMIN000007834 Oxford University Press 2018-03 2017-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5889030/ /pubmed/29293874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx816 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yamada, Y
Denda, T
Gamoh, M
Iwanaga, I
Yuki, S
Shimodaira, H
Nakamura, M
Yamaguchi, T
Ohori, H
Kobayashi, K
Tsuda, M
Kobayashi, Y
Miyamoto, Y
Kotake, M
Shimada, K
Sato, A
Morita, S
Takahashi, S
Komatsu, Y
Ishioka, C
S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): a randomized, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial
title S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): a randomized, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial
title_full S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): a randomized, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial
title_fullStr S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): a randomized, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): a randomized, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial
title_short S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): a randomized, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial
title_sort s-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mfolfox6 or capeox plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (tricolore): a randomized, open-label, phase iii, noninferiority trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx816
work_keys_str_mv AT yamaday s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT dendat s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT gamohm s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT iwanagai s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT yukis s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT shimodairah s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT nakamuram s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT yamaguchit s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT ohorih s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT kobayashik s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT tsudam s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT kobayashiy s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT miyamotoy s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT kotakem s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT shimadak s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT satoa s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT moritas s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT takahashis s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT komatsuy s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial
AT ishiokac s1andirinotecanplusbevacizumabversusmfolfox6orcapeoxplusbevacizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertricolorearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiinoninferioritytrial