Cargando…
Is shock impedance value alone to be considered a good predictor for shock efficacy in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator?
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) is easy to implant, with poor risks of the patient. However, fat is a poor current conductor and increases defibrillation threshold. As shock impedance alone should not be considered a good efficacy predictor of an S‐ICD system, an X‐ray la...
Autores principales: | Di Girolamo, Enrico, Furia, Nanda, Faustino, Massimiliano, Appignani, Marianna, Arcari, Giampiero, Angelini, Alessandro, Spadoni, Loris |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.1408 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shock: Appropriate or Inappropriate?
por: Ip, James E.
Publicado: (2017) -
An “UninTENSional” Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Shock
por: Turner, Suzette L., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Inappropriate subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for bradycardia
por: Chua, Kelvin C.M., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Successful defibrillation verification in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator recipients by low‐energy shocks
por: Biffi, Mauro, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Mobile subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads to oversensing and inappropriate shocks
por: Kiamanesh, Omid, et al.
Publicado: (2019)