Cargando…

Maternal, dominance and additive genetic effects in Nile tilapia; influence on growth, fillet yield and body size traits

There are only few studies of dominance effects in non-inbred aquaculture species, since commonly used mating designs often have low power to separate dominance, maternal and common environmental effects. Here, a factorial design with reciprocal cross, common rearing of eggs and subsequent lifecycle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, R, Woolliams, JA, Meuwissen, THE, Gjøen, HM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29335620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-017-0046-x
_version_ 1783312686603304960
author Joshi, R
Woolliams, JA
Meuwissen, THE
Gjøen, HM
author_facet Joshi, R
Woolliams, JA
Meuwissen, THE
Gjøen, HM
author_sort Joshi, R
collection PubMed
description There are only few studies of dominance effects in non-inbred aquaculture species, since commonly used mating designs often have low power to separate dominance, maternal and common environmental effects. Here, a factorial design with reciprocal cross, common rearing of eggs and subsequent lifecycle stages and pedigree assignment using DNA microsatellites was used to separate these effects and estimate dominance (d(2)) and maternal (m(2)) ratios in Nile tilapia for six commercial traits. The study included observations on 2524 offspring from 155 full-sib families. Substantial contributions of dominance were observed (P < 0.05) for body depth (BD) and body weight at harvest (BWH) with estimates of d(2) = 0.27 (s.e. 0.09) and 0.23 (s.e. 0.09), respectively in the current breeding population. In addition the study found maternal variance (P < 0.05) for BD, BWH, body thickness and fillet weight explaining ~10% of the observed phenotypic variance. For fillet yield (FY) and body length (BL), no evidence was found for either maternal or dominance variance. For traits exhibiting maternal variance, including this effect in evaluations caused substantial re-ranking of selection candidates, but the impact of including dominance effects was notably less. Breeding schemes may benefit from utilising maternal variance in increasing accuracy of evaluations, reducing bias, and developing new lines, but the utilisation of the dominance variance may require further refinement of parameter estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5889400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58894002018-04-09 Maternal, dominance and additive genetic effects in Nile tilapia; influence on growth, fillet yield and body size traits Joshi, R Woolliams, JA Meuwissen, THE Gjøen, HM Heredity (Edinb) Article There are only few studies of dominance effects in non-inbred aquaculture species, since commonly used mating designs often have low power to separate dominance, maternal and common environmental effects. Here, a factorial design with reciprocal cross, common rearing of eggs and subsequent lifecycle stages and pedigree assignment using DNA microsatellites was used to separate these effects and estimate dominance (d(2)) and maternal (m(2)) ratios in Nile tilapia for six commercial traits. The study included observations on 2524 offspring from 155 full-sib families. Substantial contributions of dominance were observed (P < 0.05) for body depth (BD) and body weight at harvest (BWH) with estimates of d(2) = 0.27 (s.e. 0.09) and 0.23 (s.e. 0.09), respectively in the current breeding population. In addition the study found maternal variance (P < 0.05) for BD, BWH, body thickness and fillet weight explaining ~10% of the observed phenotypic variance. For fillet yield (FY) and body length (BL), no evidence was found for either maternal or dominance variance. For traits exhibiting maternal variance, including this effect in evaluations caused substantial re-ranking of selection candidates, but the impact of including dominance effects was notably less. Breeding schemes may benefit from utilising maternal variance in increasing accuracy of evaluations, reducing bias, and developing new lines, but the utilisation of the dominance variance may require further refinement of parameter estimates. Springer International Publishing 2018-01-16 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5889400/ /pubmed/29335620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-017-0046-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Joshi, R
Woolliams, JA
Meuwissen, THE
Gjøen, HM
Maternal, dominance and additive genetic effects in Nile tilapia; influence on growth, fillet yield and body size traits
title Maternal, dominance and additive genetic effects in Nile tilapia; influence on growth, fillet yield and body size traits
title_full Maternal, dominance and additive genetic effects in Nile tilapia; influence on growth, fillet yield and body size traits
title_fullStr Maternal, dominance and additive genetic effects in Nile tilapia; influence on growth, fillet yield and body size traits
title_full_unstemmed Maternal, dominance and additive genetic effects in Nile tilapia; influence on growth, fillet yield and body size traits
title_short Maternal, dominance and additive genetic effects in Nile tilapia; influence on growth, fillet yield and body size traits
title_sort maternal, dominance and additive genetic effects in nile tilapia; influence on growth, fillet yield and body size traits
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29335620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-017-0046-x
work_keys_str_mv AT joshir maternaldominanceandadditivegeneticeffectsinniletilapiainfluenceongrowthfilletyieldandbodysizetraits
AT woolliamsja maternaldominanceandadditivegeneticeffectsinniletilapiainfluenceongrowthfilletyieldandbodysizetraits
AT meuwissenthe maternaldominanceandadditivegeneticeffectsinniletilapiainfluenceongrowthfilletyieldandbodysizetraits
AT gjøenhm maternaldominanceandadditivegeneticeffectsinniletilapiainfluenceongrowthfilletyieldandbodysizetraits