Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Fat Graft Preparation Methods
BACKGROUND: The addition of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to adipose tissue may improve fat graft survival, although graft retention rates vary markedly between studies. To what extent this outcome heterogeneity reflects differing methodological factors remains unknown. This systematic review aims to s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001596 |
_version_ | 1783312694537879552 |
---|---|
author | Luck, Joshua Smith, Oliver J. Mosahebi, Afshin |
author_facet | Luck, Joshua Smith, Oliver J. Mosahebi, Afshin |
author_sort | Luck, Joshua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The addition of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to adipose tissue may improve fat graft survival, although graft retention rates vary markedly between studies. To what extent this outcome heterogeneity reflects differing methodological factors remains unknown. This systematic review aims to synthesize and critically review methodological approaches to autologous PRP and fat cotransplantation in both human and animal studies. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to April 2017. Data were extracted from all in vivo studies involving autologous PRP and fat cotransplantation. A secondary aim was to assess reporting of technical detail; authors were not contacted to provide missing data. RESULTS: From 335 articles, 23 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Some 21 were performed in humans and 2 in rabbits. Six studies were randomized control trials; the remainder reported on observational data. Methods of PRP extraction and activation varied markedly between studies. Fat graft preparation was comparatively more consistent. Methods of PRP and fat mixing differed significantly, especially with regards to relative volume/volume ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Our study represents the first systematic review of methodological factors in autologous PRP and fat cotransplantation. It demonstrates that technical factors in graft preparation and administration vary significantly between in vivo studies. Such methodological heterogeneity may explain observed differences in experimental and clinical outcomes. Reporting of key procedural information is inconsistent and often inadequate. These issues make meaningful evaluation of the PRP-enhanced fat grafting literature difficult and may limit its translation into clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5889438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58894382018-04-09 A Systematic Review of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Fat Graft Preparation Methods Luck, Joshua Smith, Oliver J. Mosahebi, Afshin Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Experimental BACKGROUND: The addition of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to adipose tissue may improve fat graft survival, although graft retention rates vary markedly between studies. To what extent this outcome heterogeneity reflects differing methodological factors remains unknown. This systematic review aims to synthesize and critically review methodological approaches to autologous PRP and fat cotransplantation in both human and animal studies. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to April 2017. Data were extracted from all in vivo studies involving autologous PRP and fat cotransplantation. A secondary aim was to assess reporting of technical detail; authors were not contacted to provide missing data. RESULTS: From 335 articles, 23 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Some 21 were performed in humans and 2 in rabbits. Six studies were randomized control trials; the remainder reported on observational data. Methods of PRP extraction and activation varied markedly between studies. Fat graft preparation was comparatively more consistent. Methods of PRP and fat mixing differed significantly, especially with regards to relative volume/volume ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Our study represents the first systematic review of methodological factors in autologous PRP and fat cotransplantation. It demonstrates that technical factors in graft preparation and administration vary significantly between in vivo studies. Such methodological heterogeneity may explain observed differences in experimental and clinical outcomes. Reporting of key procedural information is inconsistent and often inadequate. These issues make meaningful evaluation of the PRP-enhanced fat grafting literature difficult and may limit its translation into clinical practice. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5889438/ /pubmed/29632775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001596 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Experimental Luck, Joshua Smith, Oliver J. Mosahebi, Afshin A Systematic Review of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Fat Graft Preparation Methods |
title | A Systematic Review of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Fat Graft Preparation Methods |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Fat Graft Preparation Methods |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Fat Graft Preparation Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Fat Graft Preparation Methods |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Fat Graft Preparation Methods |
title_sort | systematic review of autologous platelet-rich plasma and fat graft preparation methods |
topic | Experimental |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luckjoshua asystematicreviewofautologousplateletrichplasmaandfatgraftpreparationmethods AT smitholiverj asystematicreviewofautologousplateletrichplasmaandfatgraftpreparationmethods AT mosahebiafshin asystematicreviewofautologousplateletrichplasmaandfatgraftpreparationmethods AT luckjoshua systematicreviewofautologousplateletrichplasmaandfatgraftpreparationmethods AT smitholiverj systematicreviewofautologousplateletrichplasmaandfatgraftpreparationmethods AT mosahebiafshin systematicreviewofautologousplateletrichplasmaandfatgraftpreparationmethods |