Cargando…

Difference between tablet methods and paper questionnaire methods of conducting a survey with community-dwelling elderly

[Purpose] This study aimed to develop a tablet app that emulates paper questionnaires used in clinical care, and to verify the difference between the utility of tablet survey methods and paper questionnaire methods with elderly people. [Subjects and Methods] A tablet app was developed in the Java la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusumoto, Yasuaki, Kita, Yoshihiro, Kusaka, Satomi, Hiyama, Yoshinori, Tsuchiya, Junko, Kutsuna, Toshiki, Kameda, Hiroyuki, Aida, Saori, Umeda, Masaru, Takahashi, Tetsuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29643583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.2100
_version_ 1783312827582251008
author Kusumoto, Yasuaki
Kita, Yoshihiro
Kusaka, Satomi
Hiyama, Yoshinori
Tsuchiya, Junko
Kutsuna, Toshiki
Kameda, Hiroyuki
Aida, Saori
Umeda, Masaru
Takahashi, Tetsuya
author_facet Kusumoto, Yasuaki
Kita, Yoshihiro
Kusaka, Satomi
Hiyama, Yoshinori
Tsuchiya, Junko
Kutsuna, Toshiki
Kameda, Hiroyuki
Aida, Saori
Umeda, Masaru
Takahashi, Tetsuya
author_sort Kusumoto, Yasuaki
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] This study aimed to develop a tablet app that emulates paper questionnaires used in clinical care, and to verify the difference between the utility of tablet survey methods and paper questionnaire methods with elderly people. [Subjects and Methods] A tablet app was developed in the Java language. A questionnaire was provided to 30 community-dwelling elderly people. The subjects were randomly allocated to the group responding on the tablet (tablet group) or that responding to a paper-based questionnaire (questionnaire group). Assessed items included response time to questions, whether or not they had queries regarding the survey, and data input time. For the tablet group, a questionnaire was conducted regarding the operability of the tablet. [Results] There was no difference in response time between the two groups. Significantly more people in the tablet group had queries regarding the survey. Data input time was 426 seconds for the tablet group and 1268 seconds for the questionnaire group. In the survey regarding tablet operability, there were no negative opinions about the visibility of the screen. [Conclusion] Tablets can be used with elderly people to shorten the data input time. The present findings suggested that tablet surveys could be effective for a large-scale investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5890209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58902092018-04-11 Difference between tablet methods and paper questionnaire methods of conducting a survey with community-dwelling elderly Kusumoto, Yasuaki Kita, Yoshihiro Kusaka, Satomi Hiyama, Yoshinori Tsuchiya, Junko Kutsuna, Toshiki Kameda, Hiroyuki Aida, Saori Umeda, Masaru Takahashi, Tetsuya J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] This study aimed to develop a tablet app that emulates paper questionnaires used in clinical care, and to verify the difference between the utility of tablet survey methods and paper questionnaire methods with elderly people. [Subjects and Methods] A tablet app was developed in the Java language. A questionnaire was provided to 30 community-dwelling elderly people. The subjects were randomly allocated to the group responding on the tablet (tablet group) or that responding to a paper-based questionnaire (questionnaire group). Assessed items included response time to questions, whether or not they had queries regarding the survey, and data input time. For the tablet group, a questionnaire was conducted regarding the operability of the tablet. [Results] There was no difference in response time between the two groups. Significantly more people in the tablet group had queries regarding the survey. Data input time was 426 seconds for the tablet group and 1268 seconds for the questionnaire group. In the survey regarding tablet operability, there were no negative opinions about the visibility of the screen. [Conclusion] Tablets can be used with elderly people to shorten the data input time. The present findings suggested that tablet surveys could be effective for a large-scale investigation. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017-12-07 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5890209/ /pubmed/29643583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.2100 Text en 2017©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Kusumoto, Yasuaki
Kita, Yoshihiro
Kusaka, Satomi
Hiyama, Yoshinori
Tsuchiya, Junko
Kutsuna, Toshiki
Kameda, Hiroyuki
Aida, Saori
Umeda, Masaru
Takahashi, Tetsuya
Difference between tablet methods and paper questionnaire methods of conducting a survey with community-dwelling elderly
title Difference between tablet methods and paper questionnaire methods of conducting a survey with community-dwelling elderly
title_full Difference between tablet methods and paper questionnaire methods of conducting a survey with community-dwelling elderly
title_fullStr Difference between tablet methods and paper questionnaire methods of conducting a survey with community-dwelling elderly
title_full_unstemmed Difference between tablet methods and paper questionnaire methods of conducting a survey with community-dwelling elderly
title_short Difference between tablet methods and paper questionnaire methods of conducting a survey with community-dwelling elderly
title_sort difference between tablet methods and paper questionnaire methods of conducting a survey with community-dwelling elderly
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29643583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.2100
work_keys_str_mv AT kusumotoyasuaki differencebetweentabletmethodsandpaperquestionnairemethodsofconductingasurveywithcommunitydwellingelderly
AT kitayoshihiro differencebetweentabletmethodsandpaperquestionnairemethodsofconductingasurveywithcommunitydwellingelderly
AT kusakasatomi differencebetweentabletmethodsandpaperquestionnairemethodsofconductingasurveywithcommunitydwellingelderly
AT hiyamayoshinori differencebetweentabletmethodsandpaperquestionnairemethodsofconductingasurveywithcommunitydwellingelderly
AT tsuchiyajunko differencebetweentabletmethodsandpaperquestionnairemethodsofconductingasurveywithcommunitydwellingelderly
AT kutsunatoshiki differencebetweentabletmethodsandpaperquestionnairemethodsofconductingasurveywithcommunitydwellingelderly
AT kamedahiroyuki differencebetweentabletmethodsandpaperquestionnairemethodsofconductingasurveywithcommunitydwellingelderly
AT aidasaori differencebetweentabletmethodsandpaperquestionnairemethodsofconductingasurveywithcommunitydwellingelderly
AT umedamasaru differencebetweentabletmethodsandpaperquestionnairemethodsofconductingasurveywithcommunitydwellingelderly
AT takahashitetsuya differencebetweentabletmethodsandpaperquestionnairemethodsofconductingasurveywithcommunitydwellingelderly