Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff

BACKGROUND: Alcohol and drug use are leading causes of morbidity and mortality that frequently go unidentified in medical settings. As part of a multi-phase study to implement electronic health record-integrated substance use screening in primary care clinics, we interviewed key clinical stakeholder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNeely, Jennifer, Kumar, Pritika C., Rieckmann, Traci, Sedlander, Erica, Farkas, Sarah, Chollak, Christine, Kannry, Joseph L., Vega, Aida, Waite, Eva A., Peccoralo, Lauren A., Rosenthal, Richard N., McCarty, Dennis, Rotrosen, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13722-018-0110-8
_version_ 1783312856145461248
author McNeely, Jennifer
Kumar, Pritika C.
Rieckmann, Traci
Sedlander, Erica
Farkas, Sarah
Chollak, Christine
Kannry, Joseph L.
Vega, Aida
Waite, Eva A.
Peccoralo, Lauren A.
Rosenthal, Richard N.
McCarty, Dennis
Rotrosen, John
author_facet McNeely, Jennifer
Kumar, Pritika C.
Rieckmann, Traci
Sedlander, Erica
Farkas, Sarah
Chollak, Christine
Kannry, Joseph L.
Vega, Aida
Waite, Eva A.
Peccoralo, Lauren A.
Rosenthal, Richard N.
McCarty, Dennis
Rotrosen, John
author_sort McNeely, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alcohol and drug use are leading causes of morbidity and mortality that frequently go unidentified in medical settings. As part of a multi-phase study to implement electronic health record-integrated substance use screening in primary care clinics, we interviewed key clinical stakeholders to identify current substance use screening practices, barriers to screening, and recommendations for its implementation. METHODS: Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with 67 stakeholders, including patients, primary care providers (faculty and resident physicians), nurses, and medical assistants, in two urban academic health systems. Themes were identified using an inductive approach, revised through an iterative process, and mapped to the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework, which guides the implementation of new clinical practices (Graham et al. in J Contin Educ Health Prof 26(1):13–24, 2006). RESULTS: Factors affecting implementation based on KTA elements were identified from participant narratives. Identifying the problem: Participants consistently agreed that having knowledge of a patient’s substance use is important because of its impacts on health and medical care, that substance use is not properly identified in medical settings currently, and that universal screening is the best approach. Assessing barriers: Patients expressed concerns about consequences of disclosing substance use, confidentiality, and the individual’s own reluctance to acknowledge a substance use problem. Barriers identified by providers included individual-level factors such as lack of clinical knowledge and training, as well as systems-level factors including time pressure, resources, lack of space, and difficulty accessing addiction treatment. Adapting to the local context: Most patients and providers stated that the primary care provider should play a key role in substance use screening and interventions. Opinions diverged regarding the optimal approach to delivering screening, although most preferred a patient self-administered approach. Many providers reported that taking effective action once unhealthy substance use is identified is crucial. CONCLUSIONS: Participants expressed support for substance use screening as a valuable part of medical care, and identified individual-level as well as systems-level barriers to its implementation. These findings suggest that screening programs should clearly communicate the goals of screening to patients and proactively counteract stigma, address staff concerns regarding time and workflow, and provide education as well as treatment resources to primary care providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13722-018-0110-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5890352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58903522018-04-13 Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff McNeely, Jennifer Kumar, Pritika C. Rieckmann, Traci Sedlander, Erica Farkas, Sarah Chollak, Christine Kannry, Joseph L. Vega, Aida Waite, Eva A. Peccoralo, Lauren A. Rosenthal, Richard N. McCarty, Dennis Rotrosen, John Addict Sci Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: Alcohol and drug use are leading causes of morbidity and mortality that frequently go unidentified in medical settings. As part of a multi-phase study to implement electronic health record-integrated substance use screening in primary care clinics, we interviewed key clinical stakeholders to identify current substance use screening practices, barriers to screening, and recommendations for its implementation. METHODS: Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with 67 stakeholders, including patients, primary care providers (faculty and resident physicians), nurses, and medical assistants, in two urban academic health systems. Themes were identified using an inductive approach, revised through an iterative process, and mapped to the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework, which guides the implementation of new clinical practices (Graham et al. in J Contin Educ Health Prof 26(1):13–24, 2006). RESULTS: Factors affecting implementation based on KTA elements were identified from participant narratives. Identifying the problem: Participants consistently agreed that having knowledge of a patient’s substance use is important because of its impacts on health and medical care, that substance use is not properly identified in medical settings currently, and that universal screening is the best approach. Assessing barriers: Patients expressed concerns about consequences of disclosing substance use, confidentiality, and the individual’s own reluctance to acknowledge a substance use problem. Barriers identified by providers included individual-level factors such as lack of clinical knowledge and training, as well as systems-level factors including time pressure, resources, lack of space, and difficulty accessing addiction treatment. Adapting to the local context: Most patients and providers stated that the primary care provider should play a key role in substance use screening and interventions. Opinions diverged regarding the optimal approach to delivering screening, although most preferred a patient self-administered approach. Many providers reported that taking effective action once unhealthy substance use is identified is crucial. CONCLUSIONS: Participants expressed support for substance use screening as a valuable part of medical care, and identified individual-level as well as systems-level barriers to its implementation. These findings suggest that screening programs should clearly communicate the goals of screening to patients and proactively counteract stigma, address staff concerns regarding time and workflow, and provide education as well as treatment resources to primary care providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13722-018-0110-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-09 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5890352/ /pubmed/29628018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13722-018-0110-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
McNeely, Jennifer
Kumar, Pritika C.
Rieckmann, Traci
Sedlander, Erica
Farkas, Sarah
Chollak, Christine
Kannry, Joseph L.
Vega, Aida
Waite, Eva A.
Peccoralo, Lauren A.
Rosenthal, Richard N.
McCarty, Dennis
Rotrosen, John
Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff
title Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff
title_full Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff
title_short Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff
title_sort barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13722-018-0110-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mcneelyjennifer barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT kumarpritikac barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT rieckmanntraci barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT sedlandererica barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT farkassarah barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT chollakchristine barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT kannryjosephl barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT vegaaida barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT waiteevaa barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT peccoralolaurena barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT rosenthalrichardn barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT mccartydennis barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff
AT rotrosenjohn barriersandfacilitatorsaffectingtheimplementationofsubstanceusescreeninginprimarycareclinicsaqualitativestudyofpatientsprovidersandstaff