Cargando…

Evaluation of retention and fracture resistance of different fiber reinforced posts: An in vitro study

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate retention & fracture resistance of different fibre posts. METHODOLOGY: 90 extracted human permanent maxillary central incisors were used in this study. For retention evaluation, after obturation, post space preparation was done in all root canals and po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pruthi, Varun, Talwar, Sangeeta, Nawal, Ruchika Roongta, Pruthi, Preeti Jain, Choudhary, Sarika, Yadav, Seema
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_320_16
_version_ 1783312868389683200
author Pruthi, Varun
Talwar, Sangeeta
Nawal, Ruchika Roongta
Pruthi, Preeti Jain
Choudhary, Sarika
Yadav, Seema
author_facet Pruthi, Varun
Talwar, Sangeeta
Nawal, Ruchika Roongta
Pruthi, Preeti Jain
Choudhary, Sarika
Yadav, Seema
author_sort Pruthi, Varun
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate retention & fracture resistance of different fibre posts. METHODOLOGY: 90 extracted human permanent maxillary central incisors were used in this study. For retention evaluation, after obturation, post space preparation was done in all root canals and posts were cemented under three groups. Later, the posts were grasped & pulled out from the roots with the help of a three-jaw chuck at a cross-head speed of 5mm/min. Force required to dislodge each post was recorded in Newtons. To evaluate the fracture behavior of posts, artificial root canals were drilled into aluminium blocks and posts were cemented. Load required to fracture each post was recorded in Newtons. RESULTS: The results of the present study show the mean retention values for Fibrekleer Parallel post were significantly greater than those for Synca Double tapered post & Bioloren Tapered post. The mean retention values of the Double tapered post & the tapered post were not statistically different. The Synca Double tapered post had the highest mean load to fracture, and this value was significantly higher than those of FibreKleer Parallel & Bioloren Tapered post. The mean fracture resistance values of Parallel & tapered post were not statistically different CONCLUSIONS: This study showed parallel posts to have better retention than tapered and double tapered posts. Regarding the fracture resistance, double tapered posts were found to be better than parallel and tapered posts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5890405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58904052018-04-19 Evaluation of retention and fracture resistance of different fiber reinforced posts: An in vitro study Pruthi, Varun Talwar, Sangeeta Nawal, Ruchika Roongta Pruthi, Preeti Jain Choudhary, Sarika Yadav, Seema J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate retention & fracture resistance of different fibre posts. METHODOLOGY: 90 extracted human permanent maxillary central incisors were used in this study. For retention evaluation, after obturation, post space preparation was done in all root canals and posts were cemented under three groups. Later, the posts were grasped & pulled out from the roots with the help of a three-jaw chuck at a cross-head speed of 5mm/min. Force required to dislodge each post was recorded in Newtons. To evaluate the fracture behavior of posts, artificial root canals were drilled into aluminium blocks and posts were cemented. Load required to fracture each post was recorded in Newtons. RESULTS: The results of the present study show the mean retention values for Fibrekleer Parallel post were significantly greater than those for Synca Double tapered post & Bioloren Tapered post. The mean retention values of the Double tapered post & the tapered post were not statistically different. The Synca Double tapered post had the highest mean load to fracture, and this value was significantly higher than those of FibreKleer Parallel & Bioloren Tapered post. The mean fracture resistance values of Parallel & tapered post were not statistically different CONCLUSIONS: This study showed parallel posts to have better retention than tapered and double tapered posts. Regarding the fracture resistance, double tapered posts were found to be better than parallel and tapered posts. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5890405/ /pubmed/29674817 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_320_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pruthi, Varun
Talwar, Sangeeta
Nawal, Ruchika Roongta
Pruthi, Preeti Jain
Choudhary, Sarika
Yadav, Seema
Evaluation of retention and fracture resistance of different fiber reinforced posts: An in vitro study
title Evaluation of retention and fracture resistance of different fiber reinforced posts: An in vitro study
title_full Evaluation of retention and fracture resistance of different fiber reinforced posts: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Evaluation of retention and fracture resistance of different fiber reinforced posts: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of retention and fracture resistance of different fiber reinforced posts: An in vitro study
title_short Evaluation of retention and fracture resistance of different fiber reinforced posts: An in vitro study
title_sort evaluation of retention and fracture resistance of different fiber reinforced posts: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_320_16
work_keys_str_mv AT pruthivarun evaluationofretentionandfractureresistanceofdifferentfiberreinforcedpostsaninvitrostudy
AT talwarsangeeta evaluationofretentionandfractureresistanceofdifferentfiberreinforcedpostsaninvitrostudy
AT nawalruchikaroongta evaluationofretentionandfractureresistanceofdifferentfiberreinforcedpostsaninvitrostudy
AT pruthipreetijain evaluationofretentionandfractureresistanceofdifferentfiberreinforcedpostsaninvitrostudy
AT choudharysarika evaluationofretentionandfractureresistanceofdifferentfiberreinforcedpostsaninvitrostudy
AT yadavseema evaluationofretentionandfractureresistanceofdifferentfiberreinforcedpostsaninvitrostudy