Cargando…
An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection
BACKGROUND: Pulpal infections are caused by varied number of organisms and are located in various sites of root canal system. Thus, the success of root canal treatment depends on complete eradication of microbiota. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were selected and divided into four groups...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_227_17 |
_version_ | 1783312870527729664 |
---|---|
author | Sonarkar, Snehal S. Singh, Shishir Podar, Rajesh Kulkarni, Gaurav Purba, Rucheet |
author_facet | Sonarkar, Snehal S. Singh, Shishir Podar, Rajesh Kulkarni, Gaurav Purba, Rucheet |
author_sort | Sonarkar, Snehal S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pulpal infections are caused by varied number of organisms and are located in various sites of root canal system. Thus, the success of root canal treatment depends on complete eradication of microbiota. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were selected and divided into four groups (photoactivated disinfection [PAD], diode laser, 5% sodium hypochlorite [NaOCl], and normal saline). The treatment was done according to groups, following manufacturer's instructions. The efficacies of groups were evaluated using microbial culturing technique. Three samples were taken for each group and were incubated separately for aerobic and anaerobic culture. Microbial counting was done for each sample in the form of colony-forming units. RESULTS: It was evaluated using two-way analysis of variance and Friedman test. All the groups showed reduction in number of bacteria. However, for group A P < 0.0001 when analyzed for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms, whereas, with Group B and C, P < 0.0001 for aerobic microorganisms. CONCLUSION: PAD, diode laser, and 5% NaOCl showed antibacterial action against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5890414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58904142018-04-19 An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection Sonarkar, Snehal S. Singh, Shishir Podar, Rajesh Kulkarni, Gaurav Purba, Rucheet J Conserv Dent Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Pulpal infections are caused by varied number of organisms and are located in various sites of root canal system. Thus, the success of root canal treatment depends on complete eradication of microbiota. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were selected and divided into four groups (photoactivated disinfection [PAD], diode laser, 5% sodium hypochlorite [NaOCl], and normal saline). The treatment was done according to groups, following manufacturer's instructions. The efficacies of groups were evaluated using microbial culturing technique. Three samples were taken for each group and were incubated separately for aerobic and anaerobic culture. Microbial counting was done for each sample in the form of colony-forming units. RESULTS: It was evaluated using two-way analysis of variance and Friedman test. All the groups showed reduction in number of bacteria. However, for group A P < 0.0001 when analyzed for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms, whereas, with Group B and C, P < 0.0001 for aerobic microorganisms. CONCLUSION: PAD, diode laser, and 5% NaOCl showed antibacterial action against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5890414/ /pubmed/29674826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_227_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Sonarkar, Snehal S. Singh, Shishir Podar, Rajesh Kulkarni, Gaurav Purba, Rucheet An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection |
title | An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection |
title_full | An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection |
title_fullStr | An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection |
title_full_unstemmed | An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection |
title_short | An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection |
title_sort | in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_227_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonarkarsnehals aninvivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection AT singhshishir aninvivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection AT podarrajesh aninvivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection AT kulkarnigaurav aninvivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection AT purbarucheet aninvivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection AT sonarkarsnehals invivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection AT singhshishir invivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection AT podarrajesh invivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection AT kulkarnigaurav invivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection AT purbarucheet invivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection |