Cargando…

An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection

BACKGROUND: Pulpal infections are caused by varied number of organisms and are located in various sites of root canal system. Thus, the success of root canal treatment depends on complete eradication of microbiota. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were selected and divided into four groups...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonarkar, Snehal S., Singh, Shishir, Podar, Rajesh, Kulkarni, Gaurav, Purba, Rucheet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674826
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_227_17
_version_ 1783312870527729664
author Sonarkar, Snehal S.
Singh, Shishir
Podar, Rajesh
Kulkarni, Gaurav
Purba, Rucheet
author_facet Sonarkar, Snehal S.
Singh, Shishir
Podar, Rajesh
Kulkarni, Gaurav
Purba, Rucheet
author_sort Sonarkar, Snehal S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulpal infections are caused by varied number of organisms and are located in various sites of root canal system. Thus, the success of root canal treatment depends on complete eradication of microbiota. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were selected and divided into four groups (photoactivated disinfection [PAD], diode laser, 5% sodium hypochlorite [NaOCl], and normal saline). The treatment was done according to groups, following manufacturer's instructions. The efficacies of groups were evaluated using microbial culturing technique. Three samples were taken for each group and were incubated separately for aerobic and anaerobic culture. Microbial counting was done for each sample in the form of colony-forming units. RESULTS: It was evaluated using two-way analysis of variance and Friedman test. All the groups showed reduction in number of bacteria. However, for group A P < 0.0001 when analyzed for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms, whereas, with Group B and C, P < 0.0001 for aerobic microorganisms. CONCLUSION: PAD, diode laser, and 5% NaOCl showed antibacterial action against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5890414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58904142018-04-19 An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection Sonarkar, Snehal S. Singh, Shishir Podar, Rajesh Kulkarni, Gaurav Purba, Rucheet J Conserv Dent Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Pulpal infections are caused by varied number of organisms and are located in various sites of root canal system. Thus, the success of root canal treatment depends on complete eradication of microbiota. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were selected and divided into four groups (photoactivated disinfection [PAD], diode laser, 5% sodium hypochlorite [NaOCl], and normal saline). The treatment was done according to groups, following manufacturer's instructions. The efficacies of groups were evaluated using microbial culturing technique. Three samples were taken for each group and were incubated separately for aerobic and anaerobic culture. Microbial counting was done for each sample in the form of colony-forming units. RESULTS: It was evaluated using two-way analysis of variance and Friedman test. All the groups showed reduction in number of bacteria. However, for group A P < 0.0001 when analyzed for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms, whereas, with Group B and C, P < 0.0001 for aerobic microorganisms. CONCLUSION: PAD, diode laser, and 5% NaOCl showed antibacterial action against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5890414/ /pubmed/29674826 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_227_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Sonarkar, Snehal S.
Singh, Shishir
Podar, Rajesh
Kulkarni, Gaurav
Purba, Rucheet
An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection
title An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection
title_full An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection
title_fullStr An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection
title_full_unstemmed An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection
title_short An in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection
title_sort in vivo comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of photoactivated disinfection, diode laser, and 5% sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674826
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_227_17
work_keys_str_mv AT sonarkarsnehals aninvivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection
AT singhshishir aninvivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection
AT podarrajesh aninvivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection
AT kulkarnigaurav aninvivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection
AT purbarucheet aninvivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection
AT sonarkarsnehals invivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection
AT singhshishir invivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection
AT podarrajesh invivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection
AT kulkarnigaurav invivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection
AT purbarucheet invivocomparisonoftheantibacterialefficacyofphotoactivateddisinfectiondiodelaserand5sodiumhypochloriteinrootcanaldisinfection