Cargando…
Drooling Reduction Intervention randomised trial (DRI): comparing the efficacy and acceptability of hyoscine patches and glycopyrronium liquid on drooling in children with neurodisability
OBJECTIVE: Investigate whether hyoscine patch or glycopyrronium liquid is more effective and acceptable to treat drooling in children with neurodisability. DESIGN: Multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Recruitment through neurodisability teams; treatment by parents. PARTIC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29192000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313763 |
_version_ | 1783312900243324928 |
---|---|
author | Parr, Jeremy R Todhunter, Emma Pennington, Lindsay Stocken, Deborah Cadwgan, Jill O’Hare, Anne E Tuffrey, Catherine Williams, Jane Cole, Mike Colver, Allan F |
author_facet | Parr, Jeremy R Todhunter, Emma Pennington, Lindsay Stocken, Deborah Cadwgan, Jill O’Hare, Anne E Tuffrey, Catherine Williams, Jane Cole, Mike Colver, Allan F |
author_sort | Parr, Jeremy R |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Investigate whether hyoscine patch or glycopyrronium liquid is more effective and acceptable to treat drooling in children with neurodisability. DESIGN: Multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Recruitment through neurodisability teams; treatment by parents. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety children with neurodisability who had never received medication for drooling (55 boys, 35 girls; median age 4 years). Exclusion criteria: medication contraindicated; in a trial that could affect drooling or management. INTERVENTION: Children were randomised to receive a hyoscine skin patch or glycopyrronium liquid. Dose was increased over 4 weeks to achieve optimum symptom control with minimal side-effects; steady dose then continued to 12 weeks. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcome: Drooling Impact Scale (DIS) score at week-4. Secondary outcomes: change in DIS scores over 12 weeks, Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication; adverse events; children’s perception about treatment. RESULTS: Both medications yielded clinically and statistically significant reductions in mean DIS at week-4 (25.0 (SD 22.2) for hyoscine and 26.6 (SD 16) for glycopyrronium). There was no significant difference in change in DIS scores between treatment groups. By week-12, 26/47 (55%) children starting treatment were receiving hyoscine compared with 31/38 (82%) on glycopyrronium. There was a 42% increased chance of being on treatment at week-12 for children randomised to glycopyrronium relative to hyoscine (1.42, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.95). CONCLUSIONS: Hyoscine and glycopyrronium are clinically effective in treating drooling in children with neurodisability. Hyoscine produced more problematic side effects leading to a greater chance of treatment cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN 75287237; EUDRACT: 2013-000863-94; Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency: 17136/0264/001-0003 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5890631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58906312018-04-16 Drooling Reduction Intervention randomised trial (DRI): comparing the efficacy and acceptability of hyoscine patches and glycopyrronium liquid on drooling in children with neurodisability Parr, Jeremy R Todhunter, Emma Pennington, Lindsay Stocken, Deborah Cadwgan, Jill O’Hare, Anne E Tuffrey, Catherine Williams, Jane Cole, Mike Colver, Allan F Arch Dis Child Original Article OBJECTIVE: Investigate whether hyoscine patch or glycopyrronium liquid is more effective and acceptable to treat drooling in children with neurodisability. DESIGN: Multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Recruitment through neurodisability teams; treatment by parents. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety children with neurodisability who had never received medication for drooling (55 boys, 35 girls; median age 4 years). Exclusion criteria: medication contraindicated; in a trial that could affect drooling or management. INTERVENTION: Children were randomised to receive a hyoscine skin patch or glycopyrronium liquid. Dose was increased over 4 weeks to achieve optimum symptom control with minimal side-effects; steady dose then continued to 12 weeks. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcome: Drooling Impact Scale (DIS) score at week-4. Secondary outcomes: change in DIS scores over 12 weeks, Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication; adverse events; children’s perception about treatment. RESULTS: Both medications yielded clinically and statistically significant reductions in mean DIS at week-4 (25.0 (SD 22.2) for hyoscine and 26.6 (SD 16) for glycopyrronium). There was no significant difference in change in DIS scores between treatment groups. By week-12, 26/47 (55%) children starting treatment were receiving hyoscine compared with 31/38 (82%) on glycopyrronium. There was a 42% increased chance of being on treatment at week-12 for children randomised to glycopyrronium relative to hyoscine (1.42, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.95). CONCLUSIONS: Hyoscine and glycopyrronium are clinically effective in treating drooling in children with neurodisability. Hyoscine produced more problematic side effects leading to a greater chance of treatment cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN 75287237; EUDRACT: 2013-000863-94; Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency: 17136/0264/001-0003 BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04 2017-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5890631/ /pubmed/29192000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313763 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Parr, Jeremy R Todhunter, Emma Pennington, Lindsay Stocken, Deborah Cadwgan, Jill O’Hare, Anne E Tuffrey, Catherine Williams, Jane Cole, Mike Colver, Allan F Drooling Reduction Intervention randomised trial (DRI): comparing the efficacy and acceptability of hyoscine patches and glycopyrronium liquid on drooling in children with neurodisability |
title | Drooling Reduction Intervention randomised trial (DRI): comparing the efficacy and acceptability of hyoscine patches and glycopyrronium liquid on drooling in children with neurodisability |
title_full | Drooling Reduction Intervention randomised trial (DRI): comparing the efficacy and acceptability of hyoscine patches and glycopyrronium liquid on drooling in children with neurodisability |
title_fullStr | Drooling Reduction Intervention randomised trial (DRI): comparing the efficacy and acceptability of hyoscine patches and glycopyrronium liquid on drooling in children with neurodisability |
title_full_unstemmed | Drooling Reduction Intervention randomised trial (DRI): comparing the efficacy and acceptability of hyoscine patches and glycopyrronium liquid on drooling in children with neurodisability |
title_short | Drooling Reduction Intervention randomised trial (DRI): comparing the efficacy and acceptability of hyoscine patches and glycopyrronium liquid on drooling in children with neurodisability |
title_sort | drooling reduction intervention randomised trial (dri): comparing the efficacy and acceptability of hyoscine patches and glycopyrronium liquid on drooling in children with neurodisability |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29192000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parrjeremyr droolingreductioninterventionrandomisedtrialdricomparingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofhyoscinepatchesandglycopyrroniumliquidondroolinginchildrenwithneurodisability AT todhunteremma droolingreductioninterventionrandomisedtrialdricomparingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofhyoscinepatchesandglycopyrroniumliquidondroolinginchildrenwithneurodisability AT penningtonlindsay droolingreductioninterventionrandomisedtrialdricomparingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofhyoscinepatchesandglycopyrroniumliquidondroolinginchildrenwithneurodisability AT stockendeborah droolingreductioninterventionrandomisedtrialdricomparingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofhyoscinepatchesandglycopyrroniumliquidondroolinginchildrenwithneurodisability AT cadwganjill droolingreductioninterventionrandomisedtrialdricomparingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofhyoscinepatchesandglycopyrroniumliquidondroolinginchildrenwithneurodisability AT ohareannee droolingreductioninterventionrandomisedtrialdricomparingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofhyoscinepatchesandglycopyrroniumliquidondroolinginchildrenwithneurodisability AT tuffreycatherine droolingreductioninterventionrandomisedtrialdricomparingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofhyoscinepatchesandglycopyrroniumliquidondroolinginchildrenwithneurodisability AT williamsjane droolingreductioninterventionrandomisedtrialdricomparingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofhyoscinepatchesandglycopyrroniumliquidondroolinginchildrenwithneurodisability AT colemike droolingreductioninterventionrandomisedtrialdricomparingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofhyoscinepatchesandglycopyrroniumliquidondroolinginchildrenwithneurodisability AT colverallanf droolingreductioninterventionrandomisedtrialdricomparingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofhyoscinepatchesandglycopyrroniumliquidondroolinginchildrenwithneurodisability |