Cargando…

Assessment of the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence high-sensitivity troponin rule-out strategy

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the limit of detection of high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score combination rule-out strategy suggested within the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Chest Pain of Recent Onset guidelines a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlton, Edward Watts, Pickering, John William, Greenslade, Jaimi, Cullen, Louise, Than, Martin, Kendall, Jason, Body, Richard, Parsonage, William A, Khattab, Ahmed, Greaves, Kim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28864718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311983
_version_ 1783312902559629312
author Carlton, Edward Watts
Pickering, John William
Greenslade, Jaimi
Cullen, Louise
Than, Martin
Kendall, Jason
Body, Richard
Parsonage, William A
Khattab, Ahmed
Greaves, Kim
author_facet Carlton, Edward Watts
Pickering, John William
Greenslade, Jaimi
Cullen, Louise
Than, Martin
Kendall, Jason
Body, Richard
Parsonage, William A
Khattab, Ahmed
Greaves, Kim
author_sort Carlton, Edward Watts
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the limit of detection of high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score combination rule-out strategy suggested within the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Chest Pain of Recent Onset guidelines and establish the optimal TIMI score threshold for clinical use. METHODS: A pooled analysis of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and a non-ischaemic ECG, recruited into six prospective studies, from Australia, New Zealand and the UK. We evaluated the sensitivity of TIMI score thresholds from 0 to 2 alongside hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI for the primary outcome of major adverse cardiac events within 30 days. RESULTS: Data were available for 3159 patients for hs-cTnT and 4532 for hs-cTnI, of these 376 (11.9%) and 445 (9.8%) had major adverse cardiac events, respectively. Using a TIMI score of 0, the sensitivity for the primary outcome was 99.5% (95% CI 98.1% to 99.9%) alongside hs-cTnT and 98.9% (97.4% to 99.6%)%) alongside hs-cTnI, identifying 17.9% and 21.0% of patients as low risk, respectively. For a TIMI score ≤1 sensitivity was 98.9% (97.3% to 99.7%)%) alongside hs-cTnT and 98.4% (96.8% to 99.4%)%) alongside hs-cTnI, identifying 28.1% and 35.7% as low risk, respectively. For TIMI≤2, meta-sensitivity was <98% with either assay. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the rule-out strategy suggested by NICE. The TIMI score threshold suggested for clinical use is 0. The proportion of patients identified as low risk (18%–21%) and suitable for early discharge using this threshold may be sufficient to encourage change of practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ADAPT observational study/IMPACT intervention trial ACTRN12611001069943. ADAPT-ADP randomised controlled trial ACTRN12610000766011. EDACS-ADP randomised controlled trial ACTRN12613000745741. TRUST observational study ISRCTN no. 21109279.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5890641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58906412018-04-16 Assessment of the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence high-sensitivity troponin rule-out strategy Carlton, Edward Watts Pickering, John William Greenslade, Jaimi Cullen, Louise Than, Martin Kendall, Jason Body, Richard Parsonage, William A Khattab, Ahmed Greaves, Kim Heart Coronary Artery Disease OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the limit of detection of high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score combination rule-out strategy suggested within the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Chest Pain of Recent Onset guidelines and establish the optimal TIMI score threshold for clinical use. METHODS: A pooled analysis of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and a non-ischaemic ECG, recruited into six prospective studies, from Australia, New Zealand and the UK. We evaluated the sensitivity of TIMI score thresholds from 0 to 2 alongside hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI for the primary outcome of major adverse cardiac events within 30 days. RESULTS: Data were available for 3159 patients for hs-cTnT and 4532 for hs-cTnI, of these 376 (11.9%) and 445 (9.8%) had major adverse cardiac events, respectively. Using a TIMI score of 0, the sensitivity for the primary outcome was 99.5% (95% CI 98.1% to 99.9%) alongside hs-cTnT and 98.9% (97.4% to 99.6%)%) alongside hs-cTnI, identifying 17.9% and 21.0% of patients as low risk, respectively. For a TIMI score ≤1 sensitivity was 98.9% (97.3% to 99.7%)%) alongside hs-cTnT and 98.4% (96.8% to 99.4%)%) alongside hs-cTnI, identifying 28.1% and 35.7% as low risk, respectively. For TIMI≤2, meta-sensitivity was <98% with either assay. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the rule-out strategy suggested by NICE. The TIMI score threshold suggested for clinical use is 0. The proportion of patients identified as low risk (18%–21%) and suitable for early discharge using this threshold may be sufficient to encourage change of practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ADAPT observational study/IMPACT intervention trial ACTRN12611001069943. ADAPT-ADP randomised controlled trial ACTRN12610000766011. EDACS-ADP randomised controlled trial ACTRN12613000745741. TRUST observational study ISRCTN no. 21109279. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5890641/ /pubmed/28864718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311983 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Coronary Artery Disease
Carlton, Edward Watts
Pickering, John William
Greenslade, Jaimi
Cullen, Louise
Than, Martin
Kendall, Jason
Body, Richard
Parsonage, William A
Khattab, Ahmed
Greaves, Kim
Assessment of the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence high-sensitivity troponin rule-out strategy
title Assessment of the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence high-sensitivity troponin rule-out strategy
title_full Assessment of the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence high-sensitivity troponin rule-out strategy
title_fullStr Assessment of the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence high-sensitivity troponin rule-out strategy
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence high-sensitivity troponin rule-out strategy
title_short Assessment of the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence high-sensitivity troponin rule-out strategy
title_sort assessment of the 2016 national institute for health and care excellence high-sensitivity troponin rule-out strategy
topic Coronary Artery Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28864718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311983
work_keys_str_mv AT carltonedwardwatts assessmentofthe2016nationalinstituteforhealthandcareexcellencehighsensitivitytroponinruleoutstrategy
AT pickeringjohnwilliam assessmentofthe2016nationalinstituteforhealthandcareexcellencehighsensitivitytroponinruleoutstrategy
AT greensladejaimi assessmentofthe2016nationalinstituteforhealthandcareexcellencehighsensitivitytroponinruleoutstrategy
AT cullenlouise assessmentofthe2016nationalinstituteforhealthandcareexcellencehighsensitivitytroponinruleoutstrategy
AT thanmartin assessmentofthe2016nationalinstituteforhealthandcareexcellencehighsensitivitytroponinruleoutstrategy
AT kendalljason assessmentofthe2016nationalinstituteforhealthandcareexcellencehighsensitivitytroponinruleoutstrategy
AT bodyrichard assessmentofthe2016nationalinstituteforhealthandcareexcellencehighsensitivitytroponinruleoutstrategy
AT parsonagewilliama assessmentofthe2016nationalinstituteforhealthandcareexcellencehighsensitivitytroponinruleoutstrategy
AT khattabahmed assessmentofthe2016nationalinstituteforhealthandcareexcellencehighsensitivitytroponinruleoutstrategy
AT greaveskim assessmentofthe2016nationalinstituteforhealthandcareexcellencehighsensitivitytroponinruleoutstrategy