Cargando…
Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing (rAST) with reading of inhibition zones after 6 and/or 8 h of incubation for Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. In addition, we evaluate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29186434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx404 |
_version_ | 1783312909489668096 |
---|---|
author | Hombach, Michael Jetter, Marion Blöchliger, Nicolas Kolesnik-Goldmann, Natalia Keller, Peter M Böttger, Erik C |
author_facet | Hombach, Michael Jetter, Marion Blöchliger, Nicolas Kolesnik-Goldmann, Natalia Keller, Peter M Böttger, Erik C |
author_sort | Hombach, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing (rAST) with reading of inhibition zones after 6 and/or 8 h of incubation for Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. In addition, we evaluated discrimination of resistant populations from the WT populations at early timepoints and the requirement for clinical breakpoint adaptations for proper interpretation of rAST data. METHODS: In total, 815 clinical strains [E. faecalis (n = 135), E. faecium (n = 227), P. aeruginosa (n = 295) and A. baumannii (n = 158)] were included in this study. Disc diffusion plates were streaked, incubated and imaged using the WASPLab(TM) automation system. WT populations and non-WT populations were defined using epidemiological cut-offs. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: rAST at 6 and 8 h was possible for A. baumannii and enterococci with readability of inhibition zones >90%. Overall categorical agreement of rAST at 6 h with AST at 18 h was 97.2%, 97.4% and 95.3% for E. faecalis, E. faecium and A. baumannii, respectively. With few exceptions, major categorization error rates were <1% for A. baumannii, and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium were clearly separated from the WT at 6 h. For P. aeruginosa the average readability of inhibition zones was 68.9% at 8 h and we found an overall categorical agreement of 94.8%. Adaptations of clinical breakpoints and/or introduction of technical buffer zones, preferably based on aggregated population data from various epidemiological settings, are required for proper interpretation of rAST. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5890698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58906982018-04-13 Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp. Hombach, Michael Jetter, Marion Blöchliger, Nicolas Kolesnik-Goldmann, Natalia Keller, Peter M Böttger, Erik C J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing (rAST) with reading of inhibition zones after 6 and/or 8 h of incubation for Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. In addition, we evaluated discrimination of resistant populations from the WT populations at early timepoints and the requirement for clinical breakpoint adaptations for proper interpretation of rAST data. METHODS: In total, 815 clinical strains [E. faecalis (n = 135), E. faecium (n = 227), P. aeruginosa (n = 295) and A. baumannii (n = 158)] were included in this study. Disc diffusion plates were streaked, incubated and imaged using the WASPLab(TM) automation system. WT populations and non-WT populations were defined using epidemiological cut-offs. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: rAST at 6 and 8 h was possible for A. baumannii and enterococci with readability of inhibition zones >90%. Overall categorical agreement of rAST at 6 h with AST at 18 h was 97.2%, 97.4% and 95.3% for E. faecalis, E. faecium and A. baumannii, respectively. With few exceptions, major categorization error rates were <1% for A. baumannii, and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium were clearly separated from the WT at 6 h. For P. aeruginosa the average readability of inhibition zones was 68.9% at 8 h and we found an overall categorical agreement of 94.8%. Adaptations of clinical breakpoints and/or introduction of technical buffer zones, preferably based on aggregated population data from various epidemiological settings, are required for proper interpretation of rAST. Oxford University Press 2018-02 2017-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5890698/ /pubmed/29186434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx404 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hombach, Michael Jetter, Marion Blöchliger, Nicolas Kolesnik-Goldmann, Natalia Keller, Peter M Böttger, Erik C Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp. |
title | Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp. |
title_full | Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp. |
title_fullStr | Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp. |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp. |
title_short | Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp. |
title_sort | rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for pseudomonas aeruginosa, acinetobacter baumannii and enterococcus spp. |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29186434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx404 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hombachmichael rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp AT jettermarion rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp AT blochligernicolas rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp AT kolesnikgoldmannnatalia rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp AT kellerpeterm rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp AT bottgererikc rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp |