Cargando…

Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing (rAST) with reading of inhibition zones after 6 and/or 8 h of incubation for Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. In addition, we evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hombach, Michael, Jetter, Marion, Blöchliger, Nicolas, Kolesnik-Goldmann, Natalia, Keller, Peter M, Böttger, Erik C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29186434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx404
_version_ 1783312909489668096
author Hombach, Michael
Jetter, Marion
Blöchliger, Nicolas
Kolesnik-Goldmann, Natalia
Keller, Peter M
Böttger, Erik C
author_facet Hombach, Michael
Jetter, Marion
Blöchliger, Nicolas
Kolesnik-Goldmann, Natalia
Keller, Peter M
Böttger, Erik C
author_sort Hombach, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing (rAST) with reading of inhibition zones after 6 and/or 8 h of incubation for Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. In addition, we evaluated discrimination of resistant populations from the WT populations at early timepoints and the requirement for clinical breakpoint adaptations for proper interpretation of rAST data. METHODS: In total, 815 clinical strains [E. faecalis (n = 135), E. faecium (n = 227), P. aeruginosa (n = 295) and A. baumannii (n = 158)] were included in this study. Disc diffusion plates were streaked, incubated and imaged using the WASPLab(TM) automation system. WT populations and non-WT populations were defined using epidemiological cut-offs. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: rAST at 6 and 8 h was possible for A. baumannii and enterococci with readability of inhibition zones >90%. Overall categorical agreement of rAST at 6 h with AST at 18 h was 97.2%, 97.4% and 95.3% for E. faecalis, E. faecium and A. baumannii, respectively. With few exceptions, major categorization error rates were <1% for A. baumannii, and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium were clearly separated from the WT at 6 h. For P. aeruginosa the average readability of inhibition zones was 68.9% at 8 h and we found an overall categorical agreement of 94.8%. Adaptations of clinical breakpoints and/or introduction of technical buffer zones, preferably based on aggregated population data from various epidemiological settings, are required for proper interpretation of rAST.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5890698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58906982018-04-13 Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp. Hombach, Michael Jetter, Marion Blöchliger, Nicolas Kolesnik-Goldmann, Natalia Keller, Peter M Böttger, Erik C J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing (rAST) with reading of inhibition zones after 6 and/or 8 h of incubation for Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. In addition, we evaluated discrimination of resistant populations from the WT populations at early timepoints and the requirement for clinical breakpoint adaptations for proper interpretation of rAST data. METHODS: In total, 815 clinical strains [E. faecalis (n = 135), E. faecium (n = 227), P. aeruginosa (n = 295) and A. baumannii (n = 158)] were included in this study. Disc diffusion plates were streaked, incubated and imaged using the WASPLab(TM) automation system. WT populations and non-WT populations were defined using epidemiological cut-offs. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: rAST at 6 and 8 h was possible for A. baumannii and enterococci with readability of inhibition zones >90%. Overall categorical agreement of rAST at 6 h with AST at 18 h was 97.2%, 97.4% and 95.3% for E. faecalis, E. faecium and A. baumannii, respectively. With few exceptions, major categorization error rates were <1% for A. baumannii, and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium were clearly separated from the WT at 6 h. For P. aeruginosa the average readability of inhibition zones was 68.9% at 8 h and we found an overall categorical agreement of 94.8%. Adaptations of clinical breakpoints and/or introduction of technical buffer zones, preferably based on aggregated population data from various epidemiological settings, are required for proper interpretation of rAST. Oxford University Press 2018-02 2017-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5890698/ /pubmed/29186434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx404 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Hombach, Michael
Jetter, Marion
Blöchliger, Nicolas
Kolesnik-Goldmann, Natalia
Keller, Peter M
Böttger, Erik C
Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp.
title Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp.
title_full Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp.
title_fullStr Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp.
title_full_unstemmed Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp.
title_short Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp.
title_sort rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for pseudomonas aeruginosa, acinetobacter baumannii and enterococcus spp.
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29186434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx404
work_keys_str_mv AT hombachmichael rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp
AT jettermarion rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp
AT blochligernicolas rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp
AT kolesnikgoldmannnatalia rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp
AT kellerpeterm rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp
AT bottgererikc rapiddiscdiffusionantibioticsusceptibilitytestingforpseudomonasaeruginosaacinetobacterbaumanniiandenterococcusspp