Cargando…

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and ‘problem’ Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles

Background: We assessed the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against consecutive isolates collected in the BSAC Bacteraemia Surveillance from 2011 to 2015 and against ‘problem’ isolates sent to the UK national reference laboratory from July 2015, when routine testing began. Methods: Susceptibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Livermore, David M., Mushtaq, Shazad, Meunier, Daniele, Hopkins, Katie L., Hill, Robert, Adkin, Rachael, Chaudhry, Aiysha, Pike, Rachel, Staves, Peter, Woodford, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28520867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx136
_version_ 1783312915793707008
author Livermore, David M.
Mushtaq, Shazad
Meunier, Daniele
Hopkins, Katie L.
Hill, Robert
Adkin, Rachael
Chaudhry, Aiysha
Pike, Rachel
Staves, Peter
Woodford, Neil
author_facet Livermore, David M.
Mushtaq, Shazad
Meunier, Daniele
Hopkins, Katie L.
Hill, Robert
Adkin, Rachael
Chaudhry, Aiysha
Pike, Rachel
Staves, Peter
Woodford, Neil
author_sort Livermore, David M.
collection PubMed
description Background: We assessed the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against consecutive isolates collected in the BSAC Bacteraemia Surveillance from 2011 to 2015 and against ‘problem’ isolates sent to the UK national reference laboratory from July 2015, when routine testing began. Methods: Susceptibility testing was by BSAC agar dilution with resistance mechanisms identified by PCR and interpretive reading. Results: Data were reviewed for 6080 BSAC surveillance isolates and 5473 referred organisms. Ceftolozane/tazobactam had good activity against unselected ESBL producers in the BSAC series, but activity was reduced against ertapenem-resistant ESBL producers, which were numerous among reference submissions. AmpC-derepressed Enterobacter spp. were widely resistant, but Escherichia coli with raised chromosomal AmpC frequently remained susceptible, as did Klebsiella pneumoniae with acquired DHA-1-type AmpC. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae were mostly resistant, except for ceftazidime-susceptible isolates with OXA-48-like enzymes. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was active against 99.8% of the BSAC Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates; against referred P. aeruginosa it was active against 99.7% with moderately raised efflux, 94.7% with strongly raised efflux and 96.6% with derepressed AmpC. Resistance in P. aeruginosa was largely confined to isolates with metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) or ESBLs. MICs for referred Burkholderia spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were 2–4-fold lower than those of ceftazidime. Conclusions: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is active against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae; gains against other problem Enterobacteriaceae groups were limited. Against P. aeruginosa it overcame the two most prevalent mechanisms (up-regulated efflux and derepressed AmpC) and was active against 51.9% of isolates non-susceptible to all other β-lactams, rising to 80.9% if ESBL and MBL producers were excluded.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5890766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58907662018-04-12 Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and ‘problem’ Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles Livermore, David M. Mushtaq, Shazad Meunier, Daniele Hopkins, Katie L. Hill, Robert Adkin, Rachael Chaudhry, Aiysha Pike, Rachel Staves, Peter Woodford, Neil J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research Background: We assessed the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against consecutive isolates collected in the BSAC Bacteraemia Surveillance from 2011 to 2015 and against ‘problem’ isolates sent to the UK national reference laboratory from July 2015, when routine testing began. Methods: Susceptibility testing was by BSAC agar dilution with resistance mechanisms identified by PCR and interpretive reading. Results: Data were reviewed for 6080 BSAC surveillance isolates and 5473 referred organisms. Ceftolozane/tazobactam had good activity against unselected ESBL producers in the BSAC series, but activity was reduced against ertapenem-resistant ESBL producers, which were numerous among reference submissions. AmpC-derepressed Enterobacter spp. were widely resistant, but Escherichia coli with raised chromosomal AmpC frequently remained susceptible, as did Klebsiella pneumoniae with acquired DHA-1-type AmpC. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae were mostly resistant, except for ceftazidime-susceptible isolates with OXA-48-like enzymes. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was active against 99.8% of the BSAC Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates; against referred P. aeruginosa it was active against 99.7% with moderately raised efflux, 94.7% with strongly raised efflux and 96.6% with derepressed AmpC. Resistance in P. aeruginosa was largely confined to isolates with metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) or ESBLs. MICs for referred Burkholderia spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were 2–4-fold lower than those of ceftazidime. Conclusions: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is active against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae; gains against other problem Enterobacteriaceae groups were limited. Against P. aeruginosa it overcame the two most prevalent mechanisms (up-regulated efflux and derepressed AmpC) and was active against 51.9% of isolates non-susceptible to all other β-lactams, rising to 80.9% if ESBL and MBL producers were excluded. Oxford University Press 2017-08 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5890766/ /pubmed/28520867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx136 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Livermore, David M.
Mushtaq, Shazad
Meunier, Daniele
Hopkins, Katie L.
Hill, Robert
Adkin, Rachael
Chaudhry, Aiysha
Pike, Rachel
Staves, Peter
Woodford, Neil
Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and ‘problem’ Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles
title Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and ‘problem’ Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles
title_full Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and ‘problem’ Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles
title_fullStr Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and ‘problem’ Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles
title_full_unstemmed Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and ‘problem’ Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles
title_short Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and ‘problem’ Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles
title_sort activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and ‘problem’ enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the british isles
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28520867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx136
work_keys_str_mv AT livermoredavidm activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles
AT mushtaqshazad activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles
AT meunierdaniele activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles
AT hopkinskatiel activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles
AT hillrobert activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles
AT adkinrachael activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles
AT chaudhryaiysha activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles
AT pikerachel activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles
AT stavespeter activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles
AT woodfordneil activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles
AT activityofceftolozanetazobactamagainstsurveillanceandproblementerobacteriaceaepseudomonasaeruginosaandnonfermentersfromthebritishisles