Cargando…

Unannounced versus announced hospital surveys: a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of unannounced versus announced surveys in detecting non-compliance with accreditation standards in public hospitals. DESIGN: A nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All public hospitals in Denmark were invited. Twenty-thre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehlers, Lars Holger, Simonsen, Katherina Beltoft, Jensen, Morten Berg, Rasmussen, Gitte Sand, Olesen, Anne Vingaard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28419255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx039
_version_ 1783312930988621824
author Ehlers, Lars Holger
Simonsen, Katherina Beltoft
Jensen, Morten Berg
Rasmussen, Gitte Sand
Olesen, Anne Vingaard
author_facet Ehlers, Lars Holger
Simonsen, Katherina Beltoft
Jensen, Morten Berg
Rasmussen, Gitte Sand
Olesen, Anne Vingaard
author_sort Ehlers, Lars Holger
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of unannounced versus announced surveys in detecting non-compliance with accreditation standards in public hospitals. DESIGN: A nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All public hospitals in Denmark were invited. Twenty-three hospitals (77%) (3 university hospitals, 5 psychiatric hospitals and 15 general hospitals) agreed to participate. INTERVENTION: Twelve hospitals were randomized to receive unannounced surveys (intervention group) and eleven hospitals to receive announced surveys (control group). We hypothesized that the hospitals receiving the unannounced surveys would reveal a higher degree of non-compliance with accreditation standards than the hospitals receiving announced surveys. Nine surveyors trained and employed by the Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare (IKAS) were randomized into teams and conducted all surveys. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The outcome was the surveyors’ assessment of the hospitals’ level of compliance with 113 performance indicators—an abbreviated set of the Danish Healthcare Quality Programme (DDKM) version 2, covering organizational standards, patient pathway standards and patient safety standards. Compliance with performance indicators was analyzed using binomial regression analysis with bootstrapped robust standard errors. RESULTS: In all, 16 202 measurements were acceptable for data analysis. The risk of observing non-compliance with performance indicators for the intervention group compared with the control group was statistically insignificant (risk difference (RD) = −0.6 percentage points [−2.51–1.31], P = 0.54). A converged analysis of the six patient safety critical standards, requiring 100% compliance to gain accreditation status revealed no statistically significant difference (RD = −0.78 percentage points [−4.01–2.44], P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Unannounced hospital surveys were not more effective than announced surveys in detecting quality problems in Danish hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02348567, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02348567?term=NCT02348567.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5890868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58908682018-04-12 Unannounced versus announced hospital surveys: a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial Ehlers, Lars Holger Simonsen, Katherina Beltoft Jensen, Morten Berg Rasmussen, Gitte Sand Olesen, Anne Vingaard Int J Qual Health Care Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of unannounced versus announced surveys in detecting non-compliance with accreditation standards in public hospitals. DESIGN: A nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All public hospitals in Denmark were invited. Twenty-three hospitals (77%) (3 university hospitals, 5 psychiatric hospitals and 15 general hospitals) agreed to participate. INTERVENTION: Twelve hospitals were randomized to receive unannounced surveys (intervention group) and eleven hospitals to receive announced surveys (control group). We hypothesized that the hospitals receiving the unannounced surveys would reveal a higher degree of non-compliance with accreditation standards than the hospitals receiving announced surveys. Nine surveyors trained and employed by the Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare (IKAS) were randomized into teams and conducted all surveys. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The outcome was the surveyors’ assessment of the hospitals’ level of compliance with 113 performance indicators—an abbreviated set of the Danish Healthcare Quality Programme (DDKM) version 2, covering organizational standards, patient pathway standards and patient safety standards. Compliance with performance indicators was analyzed using binomial regression analysis with bootstrapped robust standard errors. RESULTS: In all, 16 202 measurements were acceptable for data analysis. The risk of observing non-compliance with performance indicators for the intervention group compared with the control group was statistically insignificant (risk difference (RD) = −0.6 percentage points [−2.51–1.31], P = 0.54). A converged analysis of the six patient safety critical standards, requiring 100% compliance to gain accreditation status revealed no statistically significant difference (RD = −0.78 percentage points [−4.01–2.44], P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Unannounced hospital surveys were not more effective than announced surveys in detecting quality problems in Danish hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02348567, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02348567?term=NCT02348567. Oxford University Press 2017-06 2017-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5890868/ /pubmed/28419255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx039 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Article
Ehlers, Lars Holger
Simonsen, Katherina Beltoft
Jensen, Morten Berg
Rasmussen, Gitte Sand
Olesen, Anne Vingaard
Unannounced versus announced hospital surveys: a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial
title Unannounced versus announced hospital surveys: a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_full Unannounced versus announced hospital surveys: a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Unannounced versus announced hospital surveys: a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Unannounced versus announced hospital surveys: a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_short Unannounced versus announced hospital surveys: a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_sort unannounced versus announced hospital surveys: a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28419255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx039
work_keys_str_mv AT ehlerslarsholger unannouncedversusannouncedhospitalsurveysanationwideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT simonsenkatherinabeltoft unannouncedversusannouncedhospitalsurveysanationwideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jensenmortenberg unannouncedversusannouncedhospitalsurveysanationwideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rasmussengittesand unannouncedversusannouncedhospitalsurveysanationwideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT olesenannevingaard unannouncedversusannouncedhospitalsurveysanationwideclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial