Cargando…
Measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for emergency care service provision
PURPOSE: Knowledge about patient experience within emergency departments (EDs) allows services to develop and improve in line with patient needs. There is no standardized instrument to measure patient experience. The aim of this study is to identify patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for E...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx027 |
_version_ | 1783312931921854464 |
---|---|
author | Male, Leanne Noble, Adam Atkinson, Jessica Marson, Tony |
author_facet | Male, Leanne Noble, Adam Atkinson, Jessica Marson, Tony |
author_sort | Male, Leanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Knowledge about patient experience within emergency departments (EDs) allows services to develop and improve in line with patient needs. There is no standardized instrument to measure patient experience. The aim of this study is to identify patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for EDs, examine the rigour by which they were developed and their psychometric properties when judged against standard criteria. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were identified using specific search terms and inclusion criteria. A total of eight articles, reporting on four PREMs, were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on the development and performance of the four PREMs were extracted from the articles. The measures were critiqued according to quality criteria previously described by Pesudovs K, Burr JM, Harley C, et al. (The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:663–74.). RESULTS: There was significant variation in the quality of development and reporting of psychometric properties. For all four PREMs, initial development work included the ascertainment of patient experiences using qualitative interviews. However, instrument performance was poorly assessed. Validity and reliability were measured in some studies; however responsiveness, an important aspect on survey development, was not measured in any of the included studies. CONCLUSION: PREMS currently available for use in the ED have uncertain validity, reliability and responsiveness. Further validation work is required to assess their acceptability to patients and their usefulness in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5890873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58908732018-04-12 Measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for emergency care service provision Male, Leanne Noble, Adam Atkinson, Jessica Marson, Tony Int J Qual Health Care Review Article PURPOSE: Knowledge about patient experience within emergency departments (EDs) allows services to develop and improve in line with patient needs. There is no standardized instrument to measure patient experience. The aim of this study is to identify patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for EDs, examine the rigour by which they were developed and their psychometric properties when judged against standard criteria. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were identified using specific search terms and inclusion criteria. A total of eight articles, reporting on four PREMs, were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on the development and performance of the four PREMs were extracted from the articles. The measures were critiqued according to quality criteria previously described by Pesudovs K, Burr JM, Harley C, et al. (The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:663–74.). RESULTS: There was significant variation in the quality of development and reporting of psychometric properties. For all four PREMs, initial development work included the ascertainment of patient experiences using qualitative interviews. However, instrument performance was poorly assessed. Validity and reliability were measured in some studies; however responsiveness, an important aspect on survey development, was not measured in any of the included studies. CONCLUSION: PREMS currently available for use in the ED have uncertain validity, reliability and responsiveness. Further validation work is required to assess their acceptability to patients and their usefulness in clinical practice. Oxford University Press 2017-06 2017-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5890873/ /pubmed/28339923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx027 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Male, Leanne Noble, Adam Atkinson, Jessica Marson, Tony Measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for emergency care service provision |
title | Measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for emergency care service provision |
title_full | Measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for emergency care service provision |
title_fullStr | Measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for emergency care service provision |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for emergency care service provision |
title_short | Measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for emergency care service provision |
title_sort | measuring patient experience: a systematic review to evaluate psychometric properties of patient reported experience measures (prems) for emergency care service provision |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maleleanne measuringpatientexperienceasystematicreviewtoevaluatepsychometricpropertiesofpatientreportedexperiencemeasurespremsforemergencycareserviceprovision AT nobleadam measuringpatientexperienceasystematicreviewtoevaluatepsychometricpropertiesofpatientreportedexperiencemeasurespremsforemergencycareserviceprovision AT atkinsonjessica measuringpatientexperienceasystematicreviewtoevaluatepsychometricpropertiesofpatientreportedexperiencemeasurespremsforemergencycareserviceprovision AT marsontony measuringpatientexperienceasystematicreviewtoevaluatepsychometricpropertiesofpatientreportedexperiencemeasurespremsforemergencycareserviceprovision |