Cargando…

First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis

BACKGROUND: Currently, in Belgium, bevacizumab is reimbursed for ovarian cancer patients, based on a contract between the Minister and the manufacturer including confidential agreements. This reimbursement will be re-evaluated in 2018. OBJECTIVE: To support the reimbursement reassessment by calculat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neyt, Mattias, Vlayen, Joan, Devriese, Stephan, Camberlin, Cécile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195134
_version_ 1783312944757473280
author Neyt, Mattias
Vlayen, Joan
Devriese, Stephan
Camberlin, Cécile
author_facet Neyt, Mattias
Vlayen, Joan
Devriese, Stephan
Camberlin, Cécile
author_sort Neyt, Mattias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, in Belgium, bevacizumab is reimbursed for ovarian cancer patients, based on a contract between the Minister and the manufacturer including confidential agreements. This reimbursement will be re-evaluated in 2018. OBJECTIVE: To support the reimbursement reassessment by calculating the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab: (1) in addition to first-line chemotherapy; (2) in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (platinum-sensitive or platinum-resistant). METHODS: A health economic model has been developed for the Belgian situation according to the Belgian guidelines for economic evaluations. The lifetime Markov model was set up from the perspective of the health care payer (government and patient), including direct healthcare related costs. Results are expressed as the extra costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Calculations were based on results of four international trials. Both probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of first-line bevacizumab are on average 158 000/QALY (GOG-0218 trial) and 443 000/QALY (ICON7 trial). The most favourable scenario is based on the stage IV subgroup of the GOG-0218 trial (€52 000/QALY). Since subgroup findings are often exploratory and require confirmatory studies, results of the economic evaluation based on this subgroup analysis should be considered with caution. For second-line bevacizumab, ICERs are on average €587 000/QALY (OCEANS trial) and €172 000/QALY (AURELIA trial). Sensitivity analysis shows that results are most sensitive to the price of bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: From a health economic perspective, ICERs of bevacizumab are relatively high. The most favourable results are found for first-line treatment of stage IV ovarian cancer patients. Price reductions have a major impact on the estimated ICERs. It is recommended to take these findings into account when re-evaluating the reimbursement of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5891000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58910002018-04-20 First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis Neyt, Mattias Vlayen, Joan Devriese, Stephan Camberlin, Cécile PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Currently, in Belgium, bevacizumab is reimbursed for ovarian cancer patients, based on a contract between the Minister and the manufacturer including confidential agreements. This reimbursement will be re-evaluated in 2018. OBJECTIVE: To support the reimbursement reassessment by calculating the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab: (1) in addition to first-line chemotherapy; (2) in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (platinum-sensitive or platinum-resistant). METHODS: A health economic model has been developed for the Belgian situation according to the Belgian guidelines for economic evaluations. The lifetime Markov model was set up from the perspective of the health care payer (government and patient), including direct healthcare related costs. Results are expressed as the extra costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Calculations were based on results of four international trials. Both probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of first-line bevacizumab are on average 158 000/QALY (GOG-0218 trial) and 443 000/QALY (ICON7 trial). The most favourable scenario is based on the stage IV subgroup of the GOG-0218 trial (€52 000/QALY). Since subgroup findings are often exploratory and require confirmatory studies, results of the economic evaluation based on this subgroup analysis should be considered with caution. For second-line bevacizumab, ICERs are on average €587 000/QALY (OCEANS trial) and €172 000/QALY (AURELIA trial). Sensitivity analysis shows that results are most sensitive to the price of bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: From a health economic perspective, ICERs of bevacizumab are relatively high. The most favourable results are found for first-line treatment of stage IV ovarian cancer patients. Price reductions have a major impact on the estimated ICERs. It is recommended to take these findings into account when re-evaluating the reimbursement of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. Public Library of Science 2018-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5891000/ /pubmed/29630612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195134 Text en © 2018 Neyt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Neyt, Mattias
Vlayen, Joan
Devriese, Stephan
Camberlin, Cécile
First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis
title First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis
title_full First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis
title_fullStr First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis
title_full_unstemmed First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis
title_short First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis
title_sort first- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: a belgian cost-utility analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195134
work_keys_str_mv AT neytmattias firstandsecondlinebevacizumabinovariancancerabelgiancostutilityanalysis
AT vlayenjoan firstandsecondlinebevacizumabinovariancancerabelgiancostutilityanalysis
AT devriesestephan firstandsecondlinebevacizumabinovariancancerabelgiancostutilityanalysis
AT camberlincecile firstandsecondlinebevacizumabinovariancancerabelgiancostutilityanalysis