Cargando…
Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing?
The modulatory role of the primary motor cortex (M1), reflected by an inhibitory effect of M1-stimulation on clinical pain, motivated us to deepen our understanding of M1’s role in pain modulation. We used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)-induced virtual lesion (VL) to interrupt with M1 activ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195739 |
_version_ | 1783312958609162240 |
---|---|
author | Kisler, Lee-Bareket Gurion, Ilan Granovsky, Yelena Sinai, Alon Sprecher, Elliot Shamay-Tsoory, Simone Weissman-Fogel, Irit |
author_facet | Kisler, Lee-Bareket Gurion, Ilan Granovsky, Yelena Sinai, Alon Sprecher, Elliot Shamay-Tsoory, Simone Weissman-Fogel, Irit |
author_sort | Kisler, Lee-Bareket |
collection | PubMed |
description | The modulatory role of the primary motor cortex (M1), reflected by an inhibitory effect of M1-stimulation on clinical pain, motivated us to deepen our understanding of M1’s role in pain modulation. We used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)-induced virtual lesion (VL) to interrupt with M1 activity during noxious heat pain. We hypothesized that TMS-VL will effect experimental pain ratings. Three VL protocols were applied consisting of single-pulse TMS to transiently interfere with right M1 activity: (1) VL(M1)- TMS applied to 11 subjects, 20 msec before the individual’s first pain-related M1 peak activation, as determined by source analysis (sLORETA), (2) VL(-50) (N = 16; TMS applied 50 ms prior to noxious stimulus onset), and (3) VL(+150) (N = 16; TMS applied 150 ms after noxious stimulus onset). Each protocol included 3 conditions ('pain-alone', ' TMS-VL', and ‘SHAM-VL’), each consisted of 30 noxious heat stimuli. Pain ratings were compared, in each protocol, for TMS-VL vs. SHAM-VL and vs. pain-alone conditions. Repeated measures analysis of variance, corrected for multiple comparisons revealed no significant differences in the pain ratings between the different conditions within each protocol. Therefore, our results from this exploratory study suggest that a single pulse TMS-induced VL that is targeted to M1 failed to interrupt experimental pain processing in the specific three stimulation timing examined here. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5891059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58910592018-04-20 Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing? Kisler, Lee-Bareket Gurion, Ilan Granovsky, Yelena Sinai, Alon Sprecher, Elliot Shamay-Tsoory, Simone Weissman-Fogel, Irit PLoS One Research Article The modulatory role of the primary motor cortex (M1), reflected by an inhibitory effect of M1-stimulation on clinical pain, motivated us to deepen our understanding of M1’s role in pain modulation. We used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)-induced virtual lesion (VL) to interrupt with M1 activity during noxious heat pain. We hypothesized that TMS-VL will effect experimental pain ratings. Three VL protocols were applied consisting of single-pulse TMS to transiently interfere with right M1 activity: (1) VL(M1)- TMS applied to 11 subjects, 20 msec before the individual’s first pain-related M1 peak activation, as determined by source analysis (sLORETA), (2) VL(-50) (N = 16; TMS applied 50 ms prior to noxious stimulus onset), and (3) VL(+150) (N = 16; TMS applied 150 ms after noxious stimulus onset). Each protocol included 3 conditions ('pain-alone', ' TMS-VL', and ‘SHAM-VL’), each consisted of 30 noxious heat stimuli. Pain ratings were compared, in each protocol, for TMS-VL vs. SHAM-VL and vs. pain-alone conditions. Repeated measures analysis of variance, corrected for multiple comparisons revealed no significant differences in the pain ratings between the different conditions within each protocol. Therefore, our results from this exploratory study suggest that a single pulse TMS-induced VL that is targeted to M1 failed to interrupt experimental pain processing in the specific three stimulation timing examined here. Public Library of Science 2018-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5891059/ /pubmed/29630681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195739 Text en © 2018 Kisler et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kisler, Lee-Bareket Gurion, Ilan Granovsky, Yelena Sinai, Alon Sprecher, Elliot Shamay-Tsoory, Simone Weissman-Fogel, Irit Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing? |
title | Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing? |
title_full | Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing? |
title_fullStr | Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing? |
title_short | Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing? |
title_sort | can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kislerleebareket canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing AT gurionilan canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing AT granovskyyelena canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing AT sinaialon canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing AT sprecherelliot canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing AT shamaytsoorysimone canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing AT weissmanfogelirit canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing |