Cargando…

Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing?

The modulatory role of the primary motor cortex (M1), reflected by an inhibitory effect of M1-stimulation on clinical pain, motivated us to deepen our understanding of M1’s role in pain modulation. We used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)-induced virtual lesion (VL) to interrupt with M1 activ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kisler, Lee-Bareket, Gurion, Ilan, Granovsky, Yelena, Sinai, Alon, Sprecher, Elliot, Shamay-Tsoory, Simone, Weissman-Fogel, Irit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195739
_version_ 1783312958609162240
author Kisler, Lee-Bareket
Gurion, Ilan
Granovsky, Yelena
Sinai, Alon
Sprecher, Elliot
Shamay-Tsoory, Simone
Weissman-Fogel, Irit
author_facet Kisler, Lee-Bareket
Gurion, Ilan
Granovsky, Yelena
Sinai, Alon
Sprecher, Elliot
Shamay-Tsoory, Simone
Weissman-Fogel, Irit
author_sort Kisler, Lee-Bareket
collection PubMed
description The modulatory role of the primary motor cortex (M1), reflected by an inhibitory effect of M1-stimulation on clinical pain, motivated us to deepen our understanding of M1’s role in pain modulation. We used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)-induced virtual lesion (VL) to interrupt with M1 activity during noxious heat pain. We hypothesized that TMS-VL will effect experimental pain ratings. Three VL protocols were applied consisting of single-pulse TMS to transiently interfere with right M1 activity: (1) VL(M1)- TMS applied to 11 subjects, 20 msec before the individual’s first pain-related M1 peak activation, as determined by source analysis (sLORETA), (2) VL(-50) (N = 16; TMS applied 50 ms prior to noxious stimulus onset), and (3) VL(+150) (N = 16; TMS applied 150 ms after noxious stimulus onset). Each protocol included 3 conditions ('pain-alone', ' TMS-VL', and ‘SHAM-VL’), each consisted of 30 noxious heat stimuli. Pain ratings were compared, in each protocol, for TMS-VL vs. SHAM-VL and vs. pain-alone conditions. Repeated measures analysis of variance, corrected for multiple comparisons revealed no significant differences in the pain ratings between the different conditions within each protocol. Therefore, our results from this exploratory study suggest that a single pulse TMS-induced VL that is targeted to M1 failed to interrupt experimental pain processing in the specific three stimulation timing examined here.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5891059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58910592018-04-20 Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing? Kisler, Lee-Bareket Gurion, Ilan Granovsky, Yelena Sinai, Alon Sprecher, Elliot Shamay-Tsoory, Simone Weissman-Fogel, Irit PLoS One Research Article The modulatory role of the primary motor cortex (M1), reflected by an inhibitory effect of M1-stimulation on clinical pain, motivated us to deepen our understanding of M1’s role in pain modulation. We used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)-induced virtual lesion (VL) to interrupt with M1 activity during noxious heat pain. We hypothesized that TMS-VL will effect experimental pain ratings. Three VL protocols were applied consisting of single-pulse TMS to transiently interfere with right M1 activity: (1) VL(M1)- TMS applied to 11 subjects, 20 msec before the individual’s first pain-related M1 peak activation, as determined by source analysis (sLORETA), (2) VL(-50) (N = 16; TMS applied 50 ms prior to noxious stimulus onset), and (3) VL(+150) (N = 16; TMS applied 150 ms after noxious stimulus onset). Each protocol included 3 conditions ('pain-alone', ' TMS-VL', and ‘SHAM-VL’), each consisted of 30 noxious heat stimuli. Pain ratings were compared, in each protocol, for TMS-VL vs. SHAM-VL and vs. pain-alone conditions. Repeated measures analysis of variance, corrected for multiple comparisons revealed no significant differences in the pain ratings between the different conditions within each protocol. Therefore, our results from this exploratory study suggest that a single pulse TMS-induced VL that is targeted to M1 failed to interrupt experimental pain processing in the specific three stimulation timing examined here. Public Library of Science 2018-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5891059/ /pubmed/29630681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195739 Text en © 2018 Kisler et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kisler, Lee-Bareket
Gurion, Ilan
Granovsky, Yelena
Sinai, Alon
Sprecher, Elliot
Shamay-Tsoory, Simone
Weissman-Fogel, Irit
Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing?
title Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing?
title_full Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing?
title_fullStr Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing?
title_full_unstemmed Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing?
title_short Can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing?
title_sort can a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation targeted to the motor cortex interrupt pain processing?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195739
work_keys_str_mv AT kislerleebareket canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing
AT gurionilan canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing
AT granovskyyelena canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing
AT sinaialon canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing
AT sprecherelliot canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing
AT shamaytsoorysimone canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing
AT weissmanfogelirit canasinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationtargetedtothemotorcortexinterruptpainprocessing