Cargando…

A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference

There is still a strong debate in the working memory literature about the cause of forgetting, with many articles providing evidence for the existence of temporal decay and as many publications providing evidence compatible with interference being the only mechanism involved in forgetting. In order...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemaire, Benoît, Portrat, Sophie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29666597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00416
_version_ 1783313034991632384
author Lemaire, Benoît
Portrat, Sophie
author_facet Lemaire, Benoît
Portrat, Sophie
author_sort Lemaire, Benoît
collection PubMed
description There is still a strong debate in the working memory literature about the cause of forgetting, with many articles providing evidence for the existence of temporal decay and as many publications providing evidence compatible with interference being the only mechanism involved in forgetting. In order to reconcile the two views, this article describes TBRS(∗)-I (for Time-Based Resource-Sharing(∗)-Interference), a computational model of working memory which incorporates an interference-based mechanism to the decay-based implementation TBRS(∗) within the TBRS theoretical framework. At encoding, memoranda are associated to their context, namely their position in the list. Temporal decay decreases the strength of these associations, but a refreshing process may reactivate it during free time. Distractors may alter the distributed representation of memoranda but refreshing can restore them based on the long-term memory representations. Refreshing is therefore twofold: reactivation plus restoration, each one counteracting the detrimental time-based and interference-based decays, respectively. Two types of interference are implemented: interference by confusion which depends on the degree of overlap between memoranda and distractors and interference by superposition which depends on the similarity between them. TBRS(∗)-I was tested on six benchmark findings on retention-interval and distractor-processing effects by means of millions of simulations testing the effects of seven factors on memory performance: the number of memoranda, the duration of distractor attentional capture, the duration of free time, the number of distractors, the amount of overlap between memoranda and distractors, the similarity between memoranda and distractors and the homogeneity of distractors (all identical or all distinct). TBRS(∗)-I replicated classical effects and proved to be a suitable hybrid model integrating both interference and time-based decay. The article also discusses the compatibility of TBRS(∗)-I with a unitary or dual view of memory and the issue of integrating time and interference in a single model. Computer codes and data are available at https://osf.io/65sna/.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5891628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58916282018-04-17 A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference Lemaire, Benoît Portrat, Sophie Front Psychol Psychology There is still a strong debate in the working memory literature about the cause of forgetting, with many articles providing evidence for the existence of temporal decay and as many publications providing evidence compatible with interference being the only mechanism involved in forgetting. In order to reconcile the two views, this article describes TBRS(∗)-I (for Time-Based Resource-Sharing(∗)-Interference), a computational model of working memory which incorporates an interference-based mechanism to the decay-based implementation TBRS(∗) within the TBRS theoretical framework. At encoding, memoranda are associated to their context, namely their position in the list. Temporal decay decreases the strength of these associations, but a refreshing process may reactivate it during free time. Distractors may alter the distributed representation of memoranda but refreshing can restore them based on the long-term memory representations. Refreshing is therefore twofold: reactivation plus restoration, each one counteracting the detrimental time-based and interference-based decays, respectively. Two types of interference are implemented: interference by confusion which depends on the degree of overlap between memoranda and distractors and interference by superposition which depends on the similarity between them. TBRS(∗)-I was tested on six benchmark findings on retention-interval and distractor-processing effects by means of millions of simulations testing the effects of seven factors on memory performance: the number of memoranda, the duration of distractor attentional capture, the duration of free time, the number of distractors, the amount of overlap between memoranda and distractors, the similarity between memoranda and distractors and the homogeneity of distractors (all identical or all distinct). TBRS(∗)-I replicated classical effects and proved to be a suitable hybrid model integrating both interference and time-based decay. The article also discusses the compatibility of TBRS(∗)-I with a unitary or dual view of memory and the issue of integrating time and interference in a single model. Computer codes and data are available at https://osf.io/65sna/. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5891628/ /pubmed/29666597 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00416 Text en Copyright © 2018 Lemaire and Portrat. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lemaire, Benoît
Portrat, Sophie
A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference
title A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference
title_full A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference
title_fullStr A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference
title_full_unstemmed A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference
title_short A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference
title_sort computational model of working memory integrating time-based decay and interference
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29666597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00416
work_keys_str_mv AT lemairebenoit acomputationalmodelofworkingmemoryintegratingtimebaseddecayandinterference
AT portratsophie acomputationalmodelofworkingmemoryintegratingtimebaseddecayandinterference
AT lemairebenoit computationalmodelofworkingmemoryintegratingtimebaseddecayandinterference
AT portratsophie computationalmodelofworkingmemoryintegratingtimebaseddecayandinterference