Cargando…
Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs
AIM: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in dog’s clinical samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 595 samples of whole blood, urine, and genital f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Veterinary World
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657404 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.201-208 |
_version_ | 1783313065191669760 |
---|---|
author | Boeri, Eduardo J. Wanke, María M. Madariaga, María J. Teijeiro, María L. Elena, Sebastian A. Trangoni, Marcos D. |
author_facet | Boeri, Eduardo J. Wanke, María M. Madariaga, María J. Teijeiro, María L. Elena, Sebastian A. Trangoni, Marcos D. |
author_sort | Boeri, Eduardo J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in dog’s clinical samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 595 samples of whole blood, urine, and genital fluids were evaluated between October 2014 and November 2016. To compare PCR assays, the gold standard was defined using a combination of different serological and microbiological test. Bacterial isolation from urine and blood cultures was carried out. Serological methods such as rapid slide agglutination test, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, agar gel immunodiffusion test, and buffered plate antigen test were performed. Four genes were evaluated: (i) The gene coding for the BCSP31 protein, (ii) the ribosomal gene coding for the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region, (iii) the gene coding for porins omp2a/omp2b, and (iv) the gene coding for the insertion sequence IS711. RESULTS: The results obtained were as follows: (1) For the primers that amplify the gene coding for the BCSP31 protein: S: 45.64% (confidence interval [CI] 39.81-51.46), Sp: 95.62% (CI 93.13-98.12), and LR+: 10.43 (CI 6.04-18); (2) for the primers that amplify the ribosomal gene of the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region: S: 69.80% (CI 64.42-75.18), Sp: 95.62 % (CI 93.13-98.12), and LR+: 11.52 (CI 7.31-18.13); (3) for the primers that amplify the omp2a and omp2b genes: S: 39.26% (CI 33.55-44.97), Sp: 97.31% (CI 95.30-99.32), and LR+ 14.58 (CI 7.25-29.29); and (4) for the primers that amplify the insertion sequence IS711: S: 22.82% (CI 17.89 - 27.75), Sp: 99.66% (CI 98.84-100), and LR+ 67.77 (CI 9.47-484.89). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the gene coding for the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region was the one that best detected Brucella spp. in canine clinical samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5891875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Veterinary World |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58918752018-04-13 Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs Boeri, Eduardo J. Wanke, María M. Madariaga, María J. Teijeiro, María L. Elena, Sebastian A. Trangoni, Marcos D. Vet World Research Article AIM: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in dog’s clinical samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 595 samples of whole blood, urine, and genital fluids were evaluated between October 2014 and November 2016. To compare PCR assays, the gold standard was defined using a combination of different serological and microbiological test. Bacterial isolation from urine and blood cultures was carried out. Serological methods such as rapid slide agglutination test, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, agar gel immunodiffusion test, and buffered plate antigen test were performed. Four genes were evaluated: (i) The gene coding for the BCSP31 protein, (ii) the ribosomal gene coding for the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region, (iii) the gene coding for porins omp2a/omp2b, and (iv) the gene coding for the insertion sequence IS711. RESULTS: The results obtained were as follows: (1) For the primers that amplify the gene coding for the BCSP31 protein: S: 45.64% (confidence interval [CI] 39.81-51.46), Sp: 95.62% (CI 93.13-98.12), and LR+: 10.43 (CI 6.04-18); (2) for the primers that amplify the ribosomal gene of the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region: S: 69.80% (CI 64.42-75.18), Sp: 95.62 % (CI 93.13-98.12), and LR+: 11.52 (CI 7.31-18.13); (3) for the primers that amplify the omp2a and omp2b genes: S: 39.26% (CI 33.55-44.97), Sp: 97.31% (CI 95.30-99.32), and LR+ 14.58 (CI 7.25-29.29); and (4) for the primers that amplify the insertion sequence IS711: S: 22.82% (CI 17.89 - 27.75), Sp: 99.66% (CI 98.84-100), and LR+ 67.77 (CI 9.47-484.89). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the gene coding for the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region was the one that best detected Brucella spp. in canine clinical samples. Veterinary World 2018-02 2018-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5891875/ /pubmed/29657404 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.201-208 Text en Copyright: © Boeri, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Boeri, Eduardo J. Wanke, María M. Madariaga, María J. Teijeiro, María L. Elena, Sebastian A. Trangoni, Marcos D. Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs |
title | Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs |
title_full | Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs |
title_fullStr | Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs |
title_short | Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs |
title_sort | comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657404 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.201-208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boerieduardoj comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs AT wankemariam comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs AT madariagamariaj comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs AT teijeiromarial comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs AT elenasebastiana comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs AT trangonimarcosd comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs |