Cargando…

Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs

AIM: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in dog’s clinical samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 595 samples of whole blood, urine, and genital f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boeri, Eduardo J., Wanke, María M., Madariaga, María J., Teijeiro, María L., Elena, Sebastian A., Trangoni, Marcos D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657404
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.201-208
_version_ 1783313065191669760
author Boeri, Eduardo J.
Wanke, María M.
Madariaga, María J.
Teijeiro, María L.
Elena, Sebastian A.
Trangoni, Marcos D.
author_facet Boeri, Eduardo J.
Wanke, María M.
Madariaga, María J.
Teijeiro, María L.
Elena, Sebastian A.
Trangoni, Marcos D.
author_sort Boeri, Eduardo J.
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in dog’s clinical samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 595 samples of whole blood, urine, and genital fluids were evaluated between October 2014 and November 2016. To compare PCR assays, the gold standard was defined using a combination of different serological and microbiological test. Bacterial isolation from urine and blood cultures was carried out. Serological methods such as rapid slide agglutination test, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, agar gel immunodiffusion test, and buffered plate antigen test were performed. Four genes were evaluated: (i) The gene coding for the BCSP31 protein, (ii) the ribosomal gene coding for the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region, (iii) the gene coding for porins omp2a/omp2b, and (iv) the gene coding for the insertion sequence IS711. RESULTS: The results obtained were as follows: (1) For the primers that amplify the gene coding for the BCSP31 protein: S: 45.64% (confidence interval [CI] 39.81-51.46), Sp: 95.62% (CI 93.13-98.12), and LR+: 10.43 (CI 6.04-18); (2) for the primers that amplify the ribosomal gene of the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region: S: 69.80% (CI 64.42-75.18), Sp: 95.62 % (CI 93.13-98.12), and LR+: 11.52 (CI 7.31-18.13); (3) for the primers that amplify the omp2a and omp2b genes: S: 39.26% (CI 33.55-44.97), Sp: 97.31% (CI 95.30-99.32), and LR+ 14.58 (CI 7.25-29.29); and (4) for the primers that amplify the insertion sequence IS711: S: 22.82% (CI 17.89 - 27.75), Sp: 99.66% (CI 98.84-100), and LR+ 67.77 (CI 9.47-484.89). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the gene coding for the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region was the one that best detected Brucella spp. in canine clinical samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5891875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Veterinary World
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58918752018-04-13 Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs Boeri, Eduardo J. Wanke, María M. Madariaga, María J. Teijeiro, María L. Elena, Sebastian A. Trangoni, Marcos D. Vet World Research Article AIM: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in dog’s clinical samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 595 samples of whole blood, urine, and genital fluids were evaluated between October 2014 and November 2016. To compare PCR assays, the gold standard was defined using a combination of different serological and microbiological test. Bacterial isolation from urine and blood cultures was carried out. Serological methods such as rapid slide agglutination test, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, agar gel immunodiffusion test, and buffered plate antigen test were performed. Four genes were evaluated: (i) The gene coding for the BCSP31 protein, (ii) the ribosomal gene coding for the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region, (iii) the gene coding for porins omp2a/omp2b, and (iv) the gene coding for the insertion sequence IS711. RESULTS: The results obtained were as follows: (1) For the primers that amplify the gene coding for the BCSP31 protein: S: 45.64% (confidence interval [CI] 39.81-51.46), Sp: 95.62% (CI 93.13-98.12), and LR+: 10.43 (CI 6.04-18); (2) for the primers that amplify the ribosomal gene of the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region: S: 69.80% (CI 64.42-75.18), Sp: 95.62 % (CI 93.13-98.12), and LR+: 11.52 (CI 7.31-18.13); (3) for the primers that amplify the omp2a and omp2b genes: S: 39.26% (CI 33.55-44.97), Sp: 97.31% (CI 95.30-99.32), and LR+ 14.58 (CI 7.25-29.29); and (4) for the primers that amplify the insertion sequence IS711: S: 22.82% (CI 17.89 - 27.75), Sp: 99.66% (CI 98.84-100), and LR+ 67.77 (CI 9.47-484.89). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the gene coding for the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region was the one that best detected Brucella spp. in canine clinical samples. Veterinary World 2018-02 2018-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5891875/ /pubmed/29657404 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.201-208 Text en Copyright: © Boeri, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boeri, Eduardo J.
Wanke, María M.
Madariaga, María J.
Teijeiro, María L.
Elena, Sebastian A.
Trangoni, Marcos D.
Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs
title Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs
title_full Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs
title_fullStr Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs
title_short Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs
title_sort comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of brucella spp. in clinical samples from dogs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657404
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.201-208
work_keys_str_mv AT boerieduardoj comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs
AT wankemariam comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs
AT madariagamariaj comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs
AT teijeiromarial comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs
AT elenasebastiana comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs
AT trangonimarcosd comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionassaysforthedetectionofbrucellasppinclinicalsamplesfromdogs