Cargando…
Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals
AIM: The aim of the current study was to isolate and identify naturally occurring probiotic Lactobacillus species in different animals with the different environmental background including fish, and farm animals to investigate interspecies differences in probiotics on the species level. MATERIALS AN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Veterinary World
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657408 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.227-230 |
_version_ | 1783313066128048128 |
---|---|
author | Abdou, Amr M. Hedia, Riham H. Omara, Shimaa T. Mahmoud, Mohamed Abd El-Fatah Kandil, Mai M. Bakry, M. A. |
author_facet | Abdou, Amr M. Hedia, Riham H. Omara, Shimaa T. Mahmoud, Mohamed Abd El-Fatah Kandil, Mai M. Bakry, M. A. |
author_sort | Abdou, Amr M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of the current study was to isolate and identify naturally occurring probiotic Lactobacillus species in different animals with the different environmental background including fish, and farm animals to investigate interspecies differences in probiotics on the species level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 44 fecal and milk samples were collected under aseptic conditions from cattle, buffalo, camel, sheep, goats, and fish. The samples were cultured, and the isolated strains were confirmed biochemically and molecularly using 16S rRNA multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis following DNA extraction from the bacterial isolates. RESULTS: A total of 31 isolates identified as lactobacilli were isolated from cattle milk, goat feces, sheep feces, fish feces, buffalo milk, camel milk, and goats’ milk. Lactobacillus species were identified based on the size of the PCR product. The results showed that different species were different in their lactobacilli content. At the same time, there were some differences between individuals of the same species. CONCLUSION: The diversity of probiotic strains isolated from different animal species implies different types of benefits to the host. Although it would be both money - and time-consuming research, discovering the benefit of each of these strains may provide very important information for the health of both human and animal. Furthermore, transferring these beneficial effects either to individuals within the same species or between different species would be of great importance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5891879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Veterinary World |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58918792018-04-13 Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals Abdou, Amr M. Hedia, Riham H. Omara, Shimaa T. Mahmoud, Mohamed Abd El-Fatah Kandil, Mai M. Bakry, M. A. Vet World Research Article AIM: The aim of the current study was to isolate and identify naturally occurring probiotic Lactobacillus species in different animals with the different environmental background including fish, and farm animals to investigate interspecies differences in probiotics on the species level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 44 fecal and milk samples were collected under aseptic conditions from cattle, buffalo, camel, sheep, goats, and fish. The samples were cultured, and the isolated strains were confirmed biochemically and molecularly using 16S rRNA multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis following DNA extraction from the bacterial isolates. RESULTS: A total of 31 isolates identified as lactobacilli were isolated from cattle milk, goat feces, sheep feces, fish feces, buffalo milk, camel milk, and goats’ milk. Lactobacillus species were identified based on the size of the PCR product. The results showed that different species were different in their lactobacilli content. At the same time, there were some differences between individuals of the same species. CONCLUSION: The diversity of probiotic strains isolated from different animal species implies different types of benefits to the host. Although it would be both money - and time-consuming research, discovering the benefit of each of these strains may provide very important information for the health of both human and animal. Furthermore, transferring these beneficial effects either to individuals within the same species or between different species would be of great importance. Veterinary World 2018-02 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5891879/ /pubmed/29657408 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.227-230 Text en Copyright: © Abdou, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abdou, Amr M. Hedia, Riham H. Omara, Shimaa T. Mahmoud, Mohamed Abd El-Fatah Kandil, Mai M. Bakry, M. A. Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals |
title | Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals |
title_full | Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals |
title_fullStr | Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals |
title_full_unstemmed | Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals |
title_short | Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals |
title_sort | interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657408 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.227-230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdouamrm interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals AT hediarihamh interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals AT omarashimaat interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals AT mahmoudmohamedabdelfatah interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals AT kandilmaim interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals AT bakryma interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals |