Cargando…

Gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (ZODIAC-52)

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between patient-related factors and patients’ evaluation of care. Aim was to investigate which patient-related factors are associated with patients’ evaluation of care in men and women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in primary care. METHODS: This cross-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hendriks, Steven H., Blanker, Marco H., Roelofsen, Yvonne, van Hateren, Kornelis J. J., Groenier, Klaas H., Bilo, Henk J. G., Kleefstra, Nanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3086-x
_version_ 1783313074810257408
author Hendriks, Steven H.
Blanker, Marco H.
Roelofsen, Yvonne
van Hateren, Kornelis J. J.
Groenier, Klaas H.
Bilo, Henk J. G.
Kleefstra, Nanne
author_facet Hendriks, Steven H.
Blanker, Marco H.
Roelofsen, Yvonne
van Hateren, Kornelis J. J.
Groenier, Klaas H.
Bilo, Henk J. G.
Kleefstra, Nanne
author_sort Hendriks, Steven H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between patient-related factors and patients’ evaluation of care. Aim was to investigate which patient-related factors are associated with patients’ evaluation of care in men and women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in primary care. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 1102 patients with T2D from 52 general practices. We measured patients’ evaluation with the EUROPEP questionnaire and collected demographic, clinical and psychological data from questionnaires and health records. Stepwise linear regression analyses were used. RESULTS: The location where the questionnaire was completed (at home or at the general practice) was associated with all outcomes in men and women. Next to this, in men, explanatory factors for the care provider EUROPEP subscale were use of insulin, having some problems with T2D self-care and coffee consumption (R(2) 8.4%); coffee consumption was associated with the general practice subscale (R(2) 4.0%). In women, well-being, quality of life, following a general diet, and use of oral glucose-lowering drugs were associated with the care provider subscale (R(2) 16.8%). For the general practice subscale, well-being and age were explanatory factors (R(2) 9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Only a few factors were found to be associated with patients’ evaluation of care for men and women with T2D. Taken together, these factors explained only a small part of the variance of the EUROPEP scores. This explained variance was largely attributable to the location where the questionnaire was completed. We therefore advise to be aware of the possible consequences of filing-out questionnaires about patients’ evaluation of care at the general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01570140 (Clinicaltrials.gov). Registered 29 March 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5891915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58919152018-04-11 Gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (ZODIAC-52) Hendriks, Steven H. Blanker, Marco H. Roelofsen, Yvonne van Hateren, Kornelis J. J. Groenier, Klaas H. Bilo, Henk J. G. Kleefstra, Nanne BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between patient-related factors and patients’ evaluation of care. Aim was to investigate which patient-related factors are associated with patients’ evaluation of care in men and women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in primary care. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 1102 patients with T2D from 52 general practices. We measured patients’ evaluation with the EUROPEP questionnaire and collected demographic, clinical and psychological data from questionnaires and health records. Stepwise linear regression analyses were used. RESULTS: The location where the questionnaire was completed (at home or at the general practice) was associated with all outcomes in men and women. Next to this, in men, explanatory factors for the care provider EUROPEP subscale were use of insulin, having some problems with T2D self-care and coffee consumption (R(2) 8.4%); coffee consumption was associated with the general practice subscale (R(2) 4.0%). In women, well-being, quality of life, following a general diet, and use of oral glucose-lowering drugs were associated with the care provider subscale (R(2) 16.8%). For the general practice subscale, well-being and age were explanatory factors (R(2) 9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Only a few factors were found to be associated with patients’ evaluation of care for men and women with T2D. Taken together, these factors explained only a small part of the variance of the EUROPEP scores. This explained variance was largely attributable to the location where the questionnaire was completed. We therefore advise to be aware of the possible consequences of filing-out questionnaires about patients’ evaluation of care at the general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01570140 (Clinicaltrials.gov). Registered 29 March 2012. BioMed Central 2018-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5891915/ /pubmed/29636042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3086-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hendriks, Steven H.
Blanker, Marco H.
Roelofsen, Yvonne
van Hateren, Kornelis J. J.
Groenier, Klaas H.
Bilo, Henk J. G.
Kleefstra, Nanne
Gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (ZODIAC-52)
title Gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (ZODIAC-52)
title_full Gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (ZODIAC-52)
title_fullStr Gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (ZODIAC-52)
title_full_unstemmed Gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (ZODIAC-52)
title_short Gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (ZODIAC-52)
title_sort gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (zodiac-52)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5891915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3086-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hendriksstevenh genderdifferencesintheevaluationofcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesacrosssectionalstudyzodiac52
AT blankermarcoh genderdifferencesintheevaluationofcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesacrosssectionalstudyzodiac52
AT roelofsenyvonne genderdifferencesintheevaluationofcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesacrosssectionalstudyzodiac52
AT vanhaterenkornelisjj genderdifferencesintheevaluationofcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesacrosssectionalstudyzodiac52
AT groenierklaash genderdifferencesintheevaluationofcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesacrosssectionalstudyzodiac52
AT bilohenkjg genderdifferencesintheevaluationofcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesacrosssectionalstudyzodiac52
AT kleefstrananne genderdifferencesintheevaluationofcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesacrosssectionalstudyzodiac52