Cargando…

What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review

BACKGROUND: Health policy-making can benefit from more effective use of research. In many policy settings there is scope to increase capacity for using research individually and organisationally, but little is known about what strategies work best in which circumstances. This review addresses the qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haynes, Abby, Rowbotham, Samantha J., Redman, Sally, Brennan, Sue, Williamson, Anna, Moore, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29631606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0277-1
_version_ 1783313096310259712
author Haynes, Abby
Rowbotham, Samantha J.
Redman, Sally
Brennan, Sue
Williamson, Anna
Moore, Gabriel
author_facet Haynes, Abby
Rowbotham, Samantha J.
Redman, Sally
Brennan, Sue
Williamson, Anna
Moore, Gabriel
author_sort Haynes, Abby
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health policy-making can benefit from more effective use of research. In many policy settings there is scope to increase capacity for using research individually and organisationally, but little is known about what strategies work best in which circumstances. This review addresses the question: What causal mechanisms can best explain the observed outcomes of interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research in their work? METHODS: Articles were identified from three available reviews and two databases (PAIS and WoS; 1999–2016). Using a realist approach, articles were reviewed for information about contexts, outcomes (including process effects) and possible causal mechanisms. Strategy + Context + Mechanism = Outcomes (SCMO) configurations were developed, drawing on theory and findings from other studies to develop tentative hypotheses that might be applicable across a range of intervention sites. RESULTS: We found 22 studies that spanned 18 countries. There were two dominant design strategies (needs-based tailoring and multi-component design) and 18 intervention strategies targeting four domains of capacity, namely access to research, skills improvement, systems improvement and interaction. Many potential mechanisms were identified as well as some enduring contextual characteristics that all interventions should consider. The evidence was variable, but the SCMO analysis suggested that tailored interactive workshops supported by goal-focused mentoring, and genuine collaboration, seem particularly promising. Systems supports and platforms for cross-sector collaboration are likely to play crucial roles. Gaps in the literature are discussed. CONCLUSION: This exploratory review tentatively posits causal mechanisms that might explain how intervention strategies work in different contexts to build capacity for using research in policy-making. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0277-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5892006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58920062018-04-11 What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review Haynes, Abby Rowbotham, Samantha J. Redman, Sally Brennan, Sue Williamson, Anna Moore, Gabriel Health Res Policy Syst Review BACKGROUND: Health policy-making can benefit from more effective use of research. In many policy settings there is scope to increase capacity for using research individually and organisationally, but little is known about what strategies work best in which circumstances. This review addresses the question: What causal mechanisms can best explain the observed outcomes of interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research in their work? METHODS: Articles were identified from three available reviews and two databases (PAIS and WoS; 1999–2016). Using a realist approach, articles were reviewed for information about contexts, outcomes (including process effects) and possible causal mechanisms. Strategy + Context + Mechanism = Outcomes (SCMO) configurations were developed, drawing on theory and findings from other studies to develop tentative hypotheses that might be applicable across a range of intervention sites. RESULTS: We found 22 studies that spanned 18 countries. There were two dominant design strategies (needs-based tailoring and multi-component design) and 18 intervention strategies targeting four domains of capacity, namely access to research, skills improvement, systems improvement and interaction. Many potential mechanisms were identified as well as some enduring contextual characteristics that all interventions should consider. The evidence was variable, but the SCMO analysis suggested that tailored interactive workshops supported by goal-focused mentoring, and genuine collaboration, seem particularly promising. Systems supports and platforms for cross-sector collaboration are likely to play crucial roles. Gaps in the literature are discussed. CONCLUSION: This exploratory review tentatively posits causal mechanisms that might explain how intervention strategies work in different contexts to build capacity for using research in policy-making. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0277-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5892006/ /pubmed/29631606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0277-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Haynes, Abby
Rowbotham, Samantha J.
Redman, Sally
Brennan, Sue
Williamson, Anna
Moore, Gabriel
What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review
title What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review
title_full What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review
title_fullStr What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review
title_full_unstemmed What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review
title_short What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review
title_sort what can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? a realist scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29631606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0277-1
work_keys_str_mv AT haynesabby whatcanwelearnfrominterventionsthataimtoincreasepolicymakerscapacitytouseresearcharealistscopingreview
AT rowbothamsamanthaj whatcanwelearnfrominterventionsthataimtoincreasepolicymakerscapacitytouseresearcharealistscopingreview
AT redmansally whatcanwelearnfrominterventionsthataimtoincreasepolicymakerscapacitytouseresearcharealistscopingreview
AT brennansue whatcanwelearnfrominterventionsthataimtoincreasepolicymakerscapacitytouseresearcharealistscopingreview
AT williamsonanna whatcanwelearnfrominterventionsthataimtoincreasepolicymakerscapacitytouseresearcharealistscopingreview
AT mooregabriel whatcanwelearnfrominterventionsthataimtoincreasepolicymakerscapacitytouseresearcharealistscopingreview