Cargando…

The Effect of C-Arm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of fluoroscopy devices with different sizes of image intensifier and C-arm maneuverability on operating time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose and reduction, and fixation quality at intertrochanteric femoral fractures. DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, prospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalem, Mahmut, Başarır, Kerem, Kocaoğlu, Hakan, Şahin, Ercan, Kınık, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6768272
_version_ 1783313139922632704
author Kalem, Mahmut
Başarır, Kerem
Kocaoğlu, Hakan
Şahin, Ercan
Kınık, Hakan
author_facet Kalem, Mahmut
Başarır, Kerem
Kocaoğlu, Hakan
Şahin, Ercan
Kınık, Hakan
author_sort Kalem, Mahmut
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of fluoroscopy devices with different sizes of image intensifier and C-arm maneuverability on operating time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose and reduction, and fixation quality at intertrochanteric femoral fractures. DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, prospective study. SETTING: Academic Level I trauma hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: 34 patients treated with cephalomedullary nailing for a stable, intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture (OTA A1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The total working time of the fluoroscopy device, the dose-area product (DAP), operating time, reduction quality (cortical continuity, symmetrical collodiaphyseal angle, and shortness), and fixation quality (Bosworth quadrants, the tip-apex distance, TAD). RESULTS: There were no cases of poor reduction; also the placement of the blade was optimal for 14 patients and suboptimal in 3 patients in each group. Superior-posterior placement of the blade or TAD > 25 mm was not seen in any patient. Total operating time was significantly shorter when using device A compared to the use of device B (20.1 ± 3.4 mins versus 25.3 ± 5.4 mins, p < 0.001). Total radiation time was significantly shorter with device A compared to the use of device B (58.1 ± 19.4 secs versus 98.9  ±  55.4 secs, p = 0.008). The measured radiation dose was lower with the use of device A compared to device B (3.5  ±  1.2 Gy·cm(2) versus 7.3  ±  4.5 Gy·cm(2), p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Physical properties of fluoroscopy devices used during the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures could yield significant differences in operating times and the radiation dose while having comparable clinical results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5892260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58922602018-05-20 The Effect of C-Arm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial Kalem, Mahmut Başarır, Kerem Kocaoğlu, Hakan Şahin, Ercan Kınık, Hakan Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of fluoroscopy devices with different sizes of image intensifier and C-arm maneuverability on operating time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose and reduction, and fixation quality at intertrochanteric femoral fractures. DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, prospective study. SETTING: Academic Level I trauma hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: 34 patients treated with cephalomedullary nailing for a stable, intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture (OTA A1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The total working time of the fluoroscopy device, the dose-area product (DAP), operating time, reduction quality (cortical continuity, symmetrical collodiaphyseal angle, and shortness), and fixation quality (Bosworth quadrants, the tip-apex distance, TAD). RESULTS: There were no cases of poor reduction; also the placement of the blade was optimal for 14 patients and suboptimal in 3 patients in each group. Superior-posterior placement of the blade or TAD > 25 mm was not seen in any patient. Total operating time was significantly shorter when using device A compared to the use of device B (20.1 ± 3.4 mins versus 25.3 ± 5.4 mins, p < 0.001). Total radiation time was significantly shorter with device A compared to the use of device B (58.1 ± 19.4 secs versus 98.9  ±  55.4 secs, p = 0.008). The measured radiation dose was lower with the use of device A compared to device B (3.5  ±  1.2 Gy·cm(2) versus 7.3  ±  4.5 Gy·cm(2), p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Physical properties of fluoroscopy devices used during the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures could yield significant differences in operating times and the radiation dose while having comparable clinical results. Hindawi 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5892260/ /pubmed/29780829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6768272 Text en Copyright © 2018 Mahmut Kalem et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kalem, Mahmut
Başarır, Kerem
Kocaoğlu, Hakan
Şahin, Ercan
Kınık, Hakan
The Effect of C-Arm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title The Effect of C-Arm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full The Effect of C-Arm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr The Effect of C-Arm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of C-Arm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short The Effect of C-Arm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort effect of c-arm mobility and field of vision on radiation exposure in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6768272
work_keys_str_mv AT kalemmahmut theeffectofcarmmobilityandfieldofvisiononradiationexposureinthetreatmentofproximalfemoralfracturesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT basarırkerem theeffectofcarmmobilityandfieldofvisiononradiationexposureinthetreatmentofproximalfemoralfracturesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kocaogluhakan theeffectofcarmmobilityandfieldofvisiononradiationexposureinthetreatmentofproximalfemoralfracturesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sahinercan theeffectofcarmmobilityandfieldofvisiononradiationexposureinthetreatmentofproximalfemoralfracturesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kınıkhakan theeffectofcarmmobilityandfieldofvisiononradiationexposureinthetreatmentofproximalfemoralfracturesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kalemmahmut effectofcarmmobilityandfieldofvisiononradiationexposureinthetreatmentofproximalfemoralfracturesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT basarırkerem effectofcarmmobilityandfieldofvisiononradiationexposureinthetreatmentofproximalfemoralfracturesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kocaogluhakan effectofcarmmobilityandfieldofvisiononradiationexposureinthetreatmentofproximalfemoralfracturesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sahinercan effectofcarmmobilityandfieldofvisiononradiationexposureinthetreatmentofproximalfemoralfracturesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kınıkhakan effectofcarmmobilityandfieldofvisiononradiationexposureinthetreatmentofproximalfemoralfracturesarandomizedclinicaltrial