Cargando…

Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation

OBJECTIVES: This study explores the barriers and facilitators that impact on the motivation of practitioners to participate in a quality improvement collaborative. DESIGN: A qualitative and formative evaluation using a participatory approach, the researcher-in-residence model which embraces the conc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lalani, Mirza, Hall, Kate, Skrypak, Mirek, Laing, Chris, Welch, John, Toohey, Peter, Seaholme, Sarah, Weijburg, Thomas, Eyre, Laura, Marshall, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29627818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020930
_version_ 1783313209570099200
author Lalani, Mirza
Hall, Kate
Skrypak, Mirek
Laing, Chris
Welch, John
Toohey, Peter
Seaholme, Sarah
Weijburg, Thomas
Eyre, Laura
Marshall, Martin
author_facet Lalani, Mirza
Hall, Kate
Skrypak, Mirek
Laing, Chris
Welch, John
Toohey, Peter
Seaholme, Sarah
Weijburg, Thomas
Eyre, Laura
Marshall, Martin
author_sort Lalani, Mirza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study explores the barriers and facilitators that impact on the motivation of practitioners to participate in a quality improvement collaborative. DESIGN: A qualitative and formative evaluation using a participatory approach, the researcher-in-residence model which embraces the concept of ‘coproducing’ knowledge between researchers and practitioners using a range of research methods such as participant observation, interviews and documentary analysis. The design, creation and application of newly generated evidence are facilitated by the researcher through negotiation and compromise with team members. PARTICIPANTS: Senior and middle managers, doctors and nurses. SETTING: Two hospitals in Southeast England participating in a Patient Safety Improvement Collaborative and the facilitator (host) of the collaborative, based in Central London. RESULTS: The evaluation has revealed facilitators and barriers to motivation categorised under two main themes: (1) inherent motivation and (2) factors that influence motivation, interorganisational and intraorganisational features as well as external factors. Facilitators included collaborative ‘champions,’ individuals who drove the quality improvement agenda at a local level, raising awareness and inspiring colleagues. The collaborative itself acted as a facilitator, promoting shared learning as well as building motivation for participation. A key barrier was the lack of board engagement in the participating National Health Service organisations which may have affected motivation among front-line staff. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboratives maybe an important way of engaging practitioners in quality improvement initiatives. This study highlights that despite a challenging healthcare environment in the UK, there remains motivation among individuals to participate in quality improvement programmes as they recognise that improvement approaches may facilitate positive change in local clinical processes and systems. Collaboratives can harness this individual motivation to facilitate spread and adoption of improvement methodology and build engagement across their membership.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5892757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58927572018-04-13 Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation Lalani, Mirza Hall, Kate Skrypak, Mirek Laing, Chris Welch, John Toohey, Peter Seaholme, Sarah Weijburg, Thomas Eyre, Laura Marshall, Martin BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: This study explores the barriers and facilitators that impact on the motivation of practitioners to participate in a quality improvement collaborative. DESIGN: A qualitative and formative evaluation using a participatory approach, the researcher-in-residence model which embraces the concept of ‘coproducing’ knowledge between researchers and practitioners using a range of research methods such as participant observation, interviews and documentary analysis. The design, creation and application of newly generated evidence are facilitated by the researcher through negotiation and compromise with team members. PARTICIPANTS: Senior and middle managers, doctors and nurses. SETTING: Two hospitals in Southeast England participating in a Patient Safety Improvement Collaborative and the facilitator (host) of the collaborative, based in Central London. RESULTS: The evaluation has revealed facilitators and barriers to motivation categorised under two main themes: (1) inherent motivation and (2) factors that influence motivation, interorganisational and intraorganisational features as well as external factors. Facilitators included collaborative ‘champions,’ individuals who drove the quality improvement agenda at a local level, raising awareness and inspiring colleagues. The collaborative itself acted as a facilitator, promoting shared learning as well as building motivation for participation. A key barrier was the lack of board engagement in the participating National Health Service organisations which may have affected motivation among front-line staff. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboratives maybe an important way of engaging practitioners in quality improvement initiatives. This study highlights that despite a challenging healthcare environment in the UK, there remains motivation among individuals to participate in quality improvement programmes as they recognise that improvement approaches may facilitate positive change in local clinical processes and systems. Collaboratives can harness this individual motivation to facilitate spread and adoption of improvement methodology and build engagement across their membership. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5892757/ /pubmed/29627818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020930 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Lalani, Mirza
Hall, Kate
Skrypak, Mirek
Laing, Chris
Welch, John
Toohey, Peter
Seaholme, Sarah
Weijburg, Thomas
Eyre, Laura
Marshall, Martin
Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation
title Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation
title_full Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation
title_fullStr Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation
title_short Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation
title_sort building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in nhs hospital trusts in southeast england: a qualitative participatory evaluation
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29627818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020930
work_keys_str_mv AT lalanimirza buildingmotivationtoparticipateinaqualityimprovementcollaborativeinnhshospitaltrustsinsoutheastenglandaqualitativeparticipatoryevaluation
AT hallkate buildingmotivationtoparticipateinaqualityimprovementcollaborativeinnhshospitaltrustsinsoutheastenglandaqualitativeparticipatoryevaluation
AT skrypakmirek buildingmotivationtoparticipateinaqualityimprovementcollaborativeinnhshospitaltrustsinsoutheastenglandaqualitativeparticipatoryevaluation
AT laingchris buildingmotivationtoparticipateinaqualityimprovementcollaborativeinnhshospitaltrustsinsoutheastenglandaqualitativeparticipatoryevaluation
AT welchjohn buildingmotivationtoparticipateinaqualityimprovementcollaborativeinnhshospitaltrustsinsoutheastenglandaqualitativeparticipatoryevaluation
AT tooheypeter buildingmotivationtoparticipateinaqualityimprovementcollaborativeinnhshospitaltrustsinsoutheastenglandaqualitativeparticipatoryevaluation
AT seaholmesarah buildingmotivationtoparticipateinaqualityimprovementcollaborativeinnhshospitaltrustsinsoutheastenglandaqualitativeparticipatoryevaluation
AT weijburgthomas buildingmotivationtoparticipateinaqualityimprovementcollaborativeinnhshospitaltrustsinsoutheastenglandaqualitativeparticipatoryevaluation
AT eyrelaura buildingmotivationtoparticipateinaqualityimprovementcollaborativeinnhshospitaltrustsinsoutheastenglandaqualitativeparticipatoryevaluation
AT marshallmartin buildingmotivationtoparticipateinaqualityimprovementcollaborativeinnhshospitaltrustsinsoutheastenglandaqualitativeparticipatoryevaluation