Cargando…

Should total calcium be adjusted for albumin? A retrospective observational study of laboratory data from central Norway

OBJECTIVES: Albumin-adjusted total calcium is often used as a surrogate marker for free calcium to evaluate hypocalcaemia or hypercalcaemia. Many adjustment formulas based on simple linear regression models have been published, and continue to be used in spite of questionable diagnostic accuracy. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lian, Ingrid Alsos, Åsberg, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29627804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017703
_version_ 1783313212379234304
author Lian, Ingrid Alsos
Åsberg, Arne
author_facet Lian, Ingrid Alsos
Åsberg, Arne
author_sort Lian, Ingrid Alsos
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Albumin-adjusted total calcium is often used as a surrogate marker for free calcium to evaluate hypocalcaemia or hypercalcaemia. Many adjustment formulas based on simple linear regression models have been published, and continue to be used in spite of questionable diagnostic accuracy. In the hope of finding a more pure albumin effect on total calcium, we used multiple linear regression models to adjust for other relevant variables. The regression coefficients of albumin were used to construct local adjustment formulas, and we tested whether the diagnostic accuracy was improved compared with previously published formulas and unadjusted calcium. DESIGN: A retrospective hospital laboratory data study. DATA SOURCES: The local hospital laboratory data system. SETTING: Norway, 2006–2015. PARTICIPANTS: 6549 patients above 2 years of age, where free calcium standardised at pH 7.40, total calcium, creatinine, albumin and phosphate had been analysed in a single blood draw, including hospitalised patients and patients from outpatient clinics and general practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy by Harrell’s c and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, using free calcium standardised at pH 7.40 as a gold standard, in subgroups with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 or <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). RESULTS: In the subgroup with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), the Harrell’s c of unadjusted total calcium (0.801) was significantly larger than those of the local formulas (0.790, p=0.002) and the best formula taken from literature (0.791, p=0.004). In the subgroup with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), no significant differences were found between these three formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the diagnostic accuracy of unadjusted total calcium is superior to several commonly used adjustment formulas, and we suggest that the use of such formulas should be abandoned in clinical practice. If the clinician does not trust total calcium to reflect the calcium status of the patient, free calcium should be measured.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5892769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58927692018-04-13 Should total calcium be adjusted for albumin? A retrospective observational study of laboratory data from central Norway Lian, Ingrid Alsos Åsberg, Arne BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVES: Albumin-adjusted total calcium is often used as a surrogate marker for free calcium to evaluate hypocalcaemia or hypercalcaemia. Many adjustment formulas based on simple linear regression models have been published, and continue to be used in spite of questionable diagnostic accuracy. In the hope of finding a more pure albumin effect on total calcium, we used multiple linear regression models to adjust for other relevant variables. The regression coefficients of albumin were used to construct local adjustment formulas, and we tested whether the diagnostic accuracy was improved compared with previously published formulas and unadjusted calcium. DESIGN: A retrospective hospital laboratory data study. DATA SOURCES: The local hospital laboratory data system. SETTING: Norway, 2006–2015. PARTICIPANTS: 6549 patients above 2 years of age, where free calcium standardised at pH 7.40, total calcium, creatinine, albumin and phosphate had been analysed in a single blood draw, including hospitalised patients and patients from outpatient clinics and general practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy by Harrell’s c and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, using free calcium standardised at pH 7.40 as a gold standard, in subgroups with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 or <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). RESULTS: In the subgroup with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), the Harrell’s c of unadjusted total calcium (0.801) was significantly larger than those of the local formulas (0.790, p=0.002) and the best formula taken from literature (0.791, p=0.004). In the subgroup with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), no significant differences were found between these three formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the diagnostic accuracy of unadjusted total calcium is superior to several commonly used adjustment formulas, and we suggest that the use of such formulas should be abandoned in clinical practice. If the clinician does not trust total calcium to reflect the calcium status of the patient, free calcium should be measured. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5892769/ /pubmed/29627804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017703 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Lian, Ingrid Alsos
Åsberg, Arne
Should total calcium be adjusted for albumin? A retrospective observational study of laboratory data from central Norway
title Should total calcium be adjusted for albumin? A retrospective observational study of laboratory data from central Norway
title_full Should total calcium be adjusted for albumin? A retrospective observational study of laboratory data from central Norway
title_fullStr Should total calcium be adjusted for albumin? A retrospective observational study of laboratory data from central Norway
title_full_unstemmed Should total calcium be adjusted for albumin? A retrospective observational study of laboratory data from central Norway
title_short Should total calcium be adjusted for albumin? A retrospective observational study of laboratory data from central Norway
title_sort should total calcium be adjusted for albumin? a retrospective observational study of laboratory data from central norway
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29627804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017703
work_keys_str_mv AT lianingridalsos shouldtotalcalciumbeadjustedforalbuminaretrospectiveobservationalstudyoflaboratorydatafromcentralnorway
AT asbergarne shouldtotalcalciumbeadjustedforalbuminaretrospectiveobservationalstudyoflaboratorydatafromcentralnorway