Cargando…

Management of recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: a protocol for systematic review, evidence mapping and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Although recurrence rate among cases of resected pancreatic cancer are as high as 85%, an optimal treatment for recurrent pancreatic cancer (RePC) has not been established. Previous evidence regarding RePC is scarce, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are particularly lacking. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jong-chan, Ahn, Soyeon, Cho, In Kuk, Lee, Jongchan, Kim, Jaihwan, Hwang, Jin-Hyeok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017249
_version_ 1783313213325049856
author Lee, Jong-chan
Ahn, Soyeon
Cho, In Kuk
Lee, Jongchan
Kim, Jaihwan
Hwang, Jin-Hyeok
author_facet Lee, Jong-chan
Ahn, Soyeon
Cho, In Kuk
Lee, Jongchan
Kim, Jaihwan
Hwang, Jin-Hyeok
author_sort Lee, Jong-chan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although recurrence rate among cases of resected pancreatic cancer are as high as 85%, an optimal treatment for recurrent pancreatic cancer (RePC) has not been established. Previous evidence regarding RePC is scarce, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are particularly lacking. The evidence mapping (EM) method has been introduced as a tool intended to complement the conventional systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) and is suitable for this issue. This review aims to investigate the optimal treatment options for RePC, using a newly developed automatic EM tool. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: All study types, including RCTs, non-randomised studies and other forms of observational studies will be included in the SR-EM. The Medline, Embase, Cochrane library and Scopus databases will be searched for reports of five treatment options for local and metastatic recurrences, including re-resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, best supportive care and other novel treatments, published from database inception to 30 April 2017. References from relevant studies will be searched manually. If meta-analysis is feasible, the primary outcome measure will be median overall survival. Two independent authors will select the studies and assess the risk of bias, and a third author will resolve discrepancies in consensus meeting. To visualise EM, we will use a novel web-based and open-access mapping programme, Plotting E-Map (PLOEM) (http://plotting-e-map.com). If eligible combinations of interventions for quantitative comparison are identified, we will conduct subgroup MAs using random-effect models and I(2) statistics. Publication bias will be visualised using funnel plots. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not use primary data, and therefore formal ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and committee conferences. PROSPEROREGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016049178.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5892773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58927732018-04-13 Management of recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: a protocol for systematic review, evidence mapping and meta-analysis Lee, Jong-chan Ahn, Soyeon Cho, In Kuk Lee, Jongchan Kim, Jaihwan Hwang, Jin-Hyeok BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Although recurrence rate among cases of resected pancreatic cancer are as high as 85%, an optimal treatment for recurrent pancreatic cancer (RePC) has not been established. Previous evidence regarding RePC is scarce, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are particularly lacking. The evidence mapping (EM) method has been introduced as a tool intended to complement the conventional systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) and is suitable for this issue. This review aims to investigate the optimal treatment options for RePC, using a newly developed automatic EM tool. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: All study types, including RCTs, non-randomised studies and other forms of observational studies will be included in the SR-EM. The Medline, Embase, Cochrane library and Scopus databases will be searched for reports of five treatment options for local and metastatic recurrences, including re-resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, best supportive care and other novel treatments, published from database inception to 30 April 2017. References from relevant studies will be searched manually. If meta-analysis is feasible, the primary outcome measure will be median overall survival. Two independent authors will select the studies and assess the risk of bias, and a third author will resolve discrepancies in consensus meeting. To visualise EM, we will use a novel web-based and open-access mapping programme, Plotting E-Map (PLOEM) (http://plotting-e-map.com). If eligible combinations of interventions for quantitative comparison are identified, we will conduct subgroup MAs using random-effect models and I(2) statistics. Publication bias will be visualised using funnel plots. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not use primary data, and therefore formal ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and committee conferences. PROSPEROREGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016049178. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5892773/ /pubmed/29632079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017249 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Lee, Jong-chan
Ahn, Soyeon
Cho, In Kuk
Lee, Jongchan
Kim, Jaihwan
Hwang, Jin-Hyeok
Management of recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: a protocol for systematic review, evidence mapping and meta-analysis
title Management of recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: a protocol for systematic review, evidence mapping and meta-analysis
title_full Management of recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: a protocol for systematic review, evidence mapping and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Management of recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: a protocol for systematic review, evidence mapping and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Management of recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: a protocol for systematic review, evidence mapping and meta-analysis
title_short Management of recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: a protocol for systematic review, evidence mapping and meta-analysis
title_sort management of recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: a protocol for systematic review, evidence mapping and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017249
work_keys_str_mv AT leejongchan managementofrecurrentpancreaticcanceraftersurgicalresectionaprotocolforsystematicreviewevidencemappingandmetaanalysis
AT ahnsoyeon managementofrecurrentpancreaticcanceraftersurgicalresectionaprotocolforsystematicreviewevidencemappingandmetaanalysis
AT choinkuk managementofrecurrentpancreaticcanceraftersurgicalresectionaprotocolforsystematicreviewevidencemappingandmetaanalysis
AT leejongchan managementofrecurrentpancreaticcanceraftersurgicalresectionaprotocolforsystematicreviewevidencemappingandmetaanalysis
AT kimjaihwan managementofrecurrentpancreaticcanceraftersurgicalresectionaprotocolforsystematicreviewevidencemappingandmetaanalysis
AT hwangjinhyeok managementofrecurrentpancreaticcanceraftersurgicalresectionaprotocolforsystematicreviewevidencemappingandmetaanalysis